值得社會承認 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [zhídeshèkuàichéngrèn]
值得社會承認
英文
gain the social recognition-
Observe, " said villefort, smiling, " i do not mean to deny that both these men were revolutionary scoundrels, and that the 9th thermidor and the 4th of april, in the year 1814, were lucky days for france, worthy of being gratefully remembered by every friend to monarchy and civil order ; and that explains how it comes to pass that, fallen, as i trust he is forever, napoleon has still retained a train of parasitical satellites
請注意， 」維爾福微著笑說， 「我並不是在否認我剛才說的這兩個人都是鬧革命的混蛋，我承認熱月九日熱月九日是羅伯斯庇爾等人被捕的日子。和四月四日這里指的是年月初拿破崙退位被囚的日子是法國並不幸運的兩個日子，是值得王朝和文明社會的朋友們慶祝的日子，我想說的是，雖然我想信拿破崙已永遠一蹶不振，但他卻仍然擁有一批狂熱的信徒。It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason
論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。Secondly, the content, evaluating guideline system of the food security cost were discussed, and the quantitative analysis of the food security cost at the view point of center finance expend from reform and opening of china was given. threely, the influnce factors of chinese food security under wto were analyzed thoroughly, and the new stratagem of food security - - big food and little grain ration was proposed, and the food security and its types were discussed. the article thought that ensureing the food security hi the reason cost is the process both food security control was improved and microcosmic foundation was intensified increasingly, that the moderation scale of chinese food security repertory, that the rules, which includes negative correlation alteration of agriculture proportion and modern, etc. must be followed, and that the project of water from south to north must give attention to two or more things water need of food produce ability and output
認為中國糧食安全與成本優化的過程是一個不斷改進糧食安全調控工作的過程，也是使微觀基礎得以強化的過程；按照社會可承受2的糧食可供波動與控制糧食儲備成本的標準計算，中國糧食安全儲備的適度規模為48872千噸；應根據「農業比重與農業現代化的負相關變動」 、 「比較優勢與農業保護的平衡運用」 、 「大糧食消費與增值的備擇性」 、 「產業結構調整與糧食產能保護的兼容性」等要求建立與實施旨在謀求糧食安全與產業結構調整協調的評價指標體系；北方地區對中國糧食生產與增產具有很強的正相關性，然而它正遭受著越來越嚴重的水缺乏的影響；南水北調工程必須兼顧糧食產能的用水需要，以有效緩解糧食需求的相對穩定與糧食產量波動相對較大之間的矛盾，從而達到減少儲備、節約成本的目的。Second, on this basis it goes on to dissect the predicament that under the traditional economic mode enterprises may face while they bear the environmental responsibility. the author holds the opinion that : on one hand, the existing problems of the suppose of the enterprises ’ “ economic man ” and “ social man ” in traditional theory make most enterprises positive in bearing the environmental responsibility ; influenced by the valueless theory of environmental resources and the traditional enterprises ’ “ human nature ” theory, the value orientation of the environmental responsibility of enterprises ’ legalization still stays in “ efficiency ( benefits ) first, equity for consideration ” and the traditional value idea that stresses the maintenance of individual economy efficiency is a main fact and the social efficiency is the complement
其次，在此基礎上對傳統經濟模式下企業承擔環境責任面臨的困境進行原因剖析，認為:一方面傳統理論中企業「經濟人」與「社會人」假設存在的不足使得多數企業在承擔環境責任上處于被動狀態;受環境資源無價值論及傳統企業「人性」理論的影響，故企業環境責任法律化價值取向仍停滯于強調「效率（益）優先兼顧公平」及強調維護個體經濟效率為主社會效率為輔的傳統價值理念中。分享友人