嚴法訴訟 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [yánfǎsùsòng]
嚴法訴訟 英文
actiostrictiiuris
  • 嚴 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （嚴密; 緊密） tight; rigorous 2 （嚴厲; 嚴格） strict; severe; stern; rigorous Ⅱ名詞1 ...
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  1. Since the reform and opening to the outside world, along with china ’ s monocracy modernization construction is connected to the world step by step, we are experiencing or facing the challenge from the pressure of lawsuit. compared with adr development which is in the ascendant in the west, the non - lawsuit disputes solutions including harmomegathy is playing an weaker and weaker roll in china ’ s disputes solutions - - - - - - the tradition is disappearing

    在法治現代化的發展進程中，面對越來越嚴重的訴訟壓力，與以往長期關注司法或訴訟對于糾紛解決的作用不同的是， adr的理論和實務研究已由作為訴訟附帶性部分或補充變成為糾紛解決課題中的主要研究對象。
  2. Part three paretively study the law of protection for disadvantages. it stresses particularly on the american, german and sweden into which we probe the experience is social welfare polycentrism, social run oneness, executive rigorism and jurisdiction authoritism. meanwhile, the thesis points out that disadvadvantages must be properly protected in the priniciple of either survive or competition

    第三章，弱勢群體保護的比較法考察。在對德國、美國和瑞典弱勢群體的法律保護進行分析比較的基礎上，認為這些國家弱勢群體保護的成功經驗是實行了社會福利多元化、社會管理統一化、行政執法嚴格化、司法訴訟權威化。
  3. According to the civil procedure act and relevant laws of china, occasional evidence presentation had been put into judiciary practices for a long time, which brought great difficulties in the implementation of proof burden system and caused poor efficiency and a waste of judiciary resources

    按照我國《民事訴訟法》及相關法律規定，在我國的民事司法實踐中長期以來實行的是「證據隨時提出主義」 ，這使得我國的舉證責任制度無法落到實處，並由此暴露出「證據突襲」 、重復審理等弊端，造成審判效率低下、司法資源嚴重浪費。
  4. These measures include : make the system of securities laws to perfect, consummate the institutions of the legal person in the listed companies, base securities regulatory authority to regulate the securities market according to law, maintain order of the securities market and ensure the lawful operation of the same, reinforce continuing disclosure of information and the system of financial and accounting reports, make the listed companies shall immediately submit an ad hoc report on the details of such major event to the securities regulatory authority and to the stock exchanging and the same known to the general public, promote investors consciousness of protecting themselves and consummate the civil litigation mechanism to gain compensation and damages, make use of the press to supervise the stock market and reinforce punishment to the persons who act securities fraud

    在這些原則的指導下，本文提出了一套規制證券欺詐的具體法律措施.包括健全證券法律體系，做到證券欺詐的規制有法可依;完善上市公司的法人治理結構，建立完善的證券監管體系，尤其對證券業協會的性質、功能和職責從法律上給予明確界定以確保充分發揮證券行業的自律作用，最大限強化信息披露責任，嚴格會計制度，力求信度地避免證券欺詐行為發生;強化信息披露貢任，產格會計刷度，刀水侶息準確，披露及時;增強廣大中小投資者的自我保護意識，完善賠償訴訟機制;依法賦予新聞媒體輿論監督權，充分發揮新聞媒體監督作用;深入研究證券欺詐者心理規律，加強法律懲治力度
  5. 4. retry takes place again and again. the principle of retry " respect facts and correct any mistakes " is seriously against the civil suit law

    4 、兩審終審制的外部救濟機制不協調一一『再審的無限擴張:我國再審程序「實事求是、有錯必糾」的指導思想嚴重違反了民事訴訟的司法規律
  6. Litigation fraud does not only violate the litigious obligation of the litigant, directly disrupt the normal litigation order of the judicial departments and violate the reverence of law, but also make the opposing party unvoluntarily involved into a lawsuit and mislead the court to make a wrong verdict so as to harm the legal right and interest of the opposing party

    摘要訴訟欺詐不僅違背訴訟當事人的訴訟義務，直接妨害了司法機關正常的訴訟秩序，侵害了法律尊嚴，同時，還使對方當事人無辜捲入訴訟，並通過法院的錯誤判決使其合法的權益遭到侵害。
  7. However in our country, with the influence of procedural idea " in pursuit of absolute objective authenticity " and the procedure mode of transgress of authority formed long time, the system of trial by default is not only very rough in legislative techniques, but also has its serious drawbacks in structure itself

    而我國的缺席審判制度由於受追求「絕對客觀真實」的訴訟觀念和長期以來形成的超職權主義訴訟模式的影響，不僅立法技術極為粗糙，而且本身還存在嚴重的結構性缺陷。
  8. The main types of college teachers ’ appointment contract include : the college teachers ’ of the fixed deadline, the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the deadline to complete the certain work, and the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the special attendance, and also we can get another two types of college teachers ’ appointment contract, which are individual college teachers ’ appointment contract and collective college teachers ’ appointment contract, according to the number of people in one party ; they must be work out by the strict written form, and must pass through the offer and the acceptance step, and don ’ t acknowledge the legal effect of the factual appointment contract ; after the appointment contract becomes effective, the higher college as the appointed party and the teacher as engaged party should completely fulfill the right and obligation provisions in the contract under the instructions of the three principles : fulfill personally, comprehensively, cooperatively. in which, the teachers ’ rights and obligations include : enjoy and undertake the rights and obligations as the specialist engaged in education, teaching and the scientific research ; may change or terminate the contract on the basis of the bilateral consultation, but dismissal and resignation must conform to the agreement or the legal matter ; in the liabilities for breach the contract, be headed by the practical fulfillment, including other two remedial way which are damage compensation and penalty ; in the dispute solution, must establish the perfect concrete mediation system, the arbitration and the civil lawsuit system

    高校教師聘任合同主要類型為固定期限的高校教師聘任合同、以完成一定工作為期限的高校教師聘任合同和特殊照顧的高校教師聘任合同，也可依據合同當事人一方人數的多寡不同，也可將個人高校教師聘任合同和集體高校教師聘任合同;其應當以嚴格的書面形式訂立，須經過要約、承諾步驟，且不應當承認事實聘任合同的法律效力;聘任合同生效后，作為聘任方的高等學校和受聘方的教師應當在親自履行、全面履行和協作履行三大原則的指導下完全履行合同中所約定的權利義務條款，其中教師的權利義務內容包括作為一般公民和作為從事教育教學及其科研活動的專業人員所應享有或者承擔的權利義務;經過雙方的協商可以變更或者終止合同，但解聘和辭聘必須符合約定或者法定的事由;在違約責任形式上，應當確立以實際履行為首，包括損害賠償、違約金等三種補救方式;在爭議解決方式上應當建立健全具體的調解制度、仲裁和民事訴訟制度。
  9. This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life, damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead, which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first, under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death, the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death, in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second, under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health, the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation, which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third, since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits, is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation

    本文重點探討的就是公民生命權受到侵害、健康權受到侵害、 「死者人格」受到侵害這三種情形下的受害人近親屬的精神損害賠償請求權問題。探討以介紹和比較國外相關法律規定和學術理論為前提，結合我國的實際情況，從理論與實踐相結合的角度對以上各問題分別進行了分析，並提出了作者自己的一些見解：第一、在公民從受傷害到死亡有一段時間距離的情形下，死者的近親屬除依法享有其固有的精神損害賠償請求權以外，還可以繼承死者生前就其所受之精神損害而享有的精神損害賠償請求權；第二、在加害人的行為已造成直接受害人殘疾，或者是造成其健康嚴重受損的其他後果的情形下，我國應在借鑒國外已有立法和判例的基礎上，賦予一定范圍內的受害人近親屬以精神損害賠償請求權；第三、法律保護死者人格不受侵害的目的是為了保護死者近親屬的利益和維護公共利益，一般情形下，只要死者近親屬能證明其訴訟主體的合法性，能夠證實侵害「死者人格」的行為已構成侵權，即可推定死者近親屬因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?無須舉證的「名義上的精神損害」 ，死者近親屬即可提起精神損害賠償之訴。最後，本文認為，加強對受害人近親屬的權利和利益保護問題的研究，既有一定的必要性，同時又具有十分重要的現實意義。
  10. Getting rid of the illegal obtained evidence not only is favor of restraining collect evidence illegally, and means apparent program justice, and making widely known the rule by law reason to read and purifies judicial system and maintenance constitution dignity, and more is favor of the guarantee of basic right of citizen and entire interest of society

    排除民事訴訟非法證據不僅有利於抑制非法取證行為的發生、張顯程序正義，而且是張揚法治理念、純潔司法制度、維護憲法尊嚴的表現，更有利於公民基本權利和社會整體利益的保障。
  11. Prolonged detainment becomes a little bit better but still not veiy good. furthermore, it is a common phenomenon in the sectors of police station, court and procuratorate, especiallythe courts, prolonged detainment. is harmful to the stability of the society and violate the rights of the personal freedom of the claimants, thus leads to some unfair punishment

    超期羈押的危害很大，它踐踏了法制的尊嚴，有損黨和國家的形象，違背了公正效率的刑事訴訟基本原理，直接侵犯了犯罪嫌疑人或被告人的人身權利，導致了不公正的懲罰，加重了國家賠償的負擔。
  12. After the entry of wto, it is more and more important for applying a preferable law, while facing the conflicts of jurisdiction right, and from the view of maritime action, china is facing a more severe challenge on the r

    入世以後，面臨法律選擇，法律適用的地位日趨顯要，就海事訴訟而言，管轄權理念與司法實踐的變革正面臨著更為嚴峻的挑戰。伴隨著世界經濟一體化趨勢的加強，海事訴訟管轄在各國國內領域的日益強化是必然的。
  13. In theory, it is necessary to study the theory of administrable permission and the relation between department and the other side. in practice, it is important to perfecting the law system of three links among the enactment, execution and compensate of administrable permission, and so on. it is essential to enforce the execution of the department and also need to control it strictly

    文章最後得出結論：在理論上，必須深入研究行政許可理論，研究行政許可機關及其相對人的關系；在實踐上，完善行政許可的設定、實施、救濟三個環節的法律制度，主要從行政立法、行政執法、行政復議、行政訴訟和賠償等法律制度著手，必須依法保障許可機關實施行政許可，又要黑龍江大學碩士學位論文函面畫面面面三畝畝面石石面面『面對其加以嚴格控制;同時，既要依法要求行政相對方履行其義務，又要保障公民獲得救濟的權利。
  14. Firstly, there is no adequate limitation on the initiation of appeal, which encourages the abuse of the appeal procedure and results in the waste of judicial resources and increase of judicial costs as well as the caseload in the court system

    一方面造成了稀缺的司法資源被浪費，導致訴訟成本增加與訴訟時間延長；另一方面，由於法院負荷的增加，嚴重影響二審作為上訴審的正常功能，尤其是統一法律適用功能之發揮。
  15. Chapter four gives a theoretical and legal explanation on the basis of role of sras, it also gives the answer to the question : why we should have the sras, law needs conception and also the concrete system under it chapter five stresses on the research of sras, it discusses the suitable plaintiff principle, just to identify the plaintiff in the sras, including in what circumstance could have the right of prosecution, to make what policy for the sras

    這種訴訟程序的障礙，大大限制了少數股東在受到欺壓時尋求法律保護的機會和途徑，為此，西方國家的公司法在時間中逐步創造了一種特殊的訴訟形式?股東代表訴訟，以消除這種不合理的訴訟障礙。通過對股東代表訴訟制度嚴格的分析，指明了其存在的現實意義。
  16. We certainly welcome the opportunity for further scrutiny of the plans through the administrative appeals tribunal as part of proving their rigor and sustainability.

    「作為驗證該計劃的嚴謹性和持久性執行的一部分，我們當然歡迎通過行政訴訟法庭對它所進行的進一步詳細審查的機會。 」
  17. For a long time, the action mode of authority creed has been adopted in civil procedure, while the legislation and the theoretical circles do n ' t pay enough attention to the principle of good faith. compared to western countries, the existing system of civil procedure cannot effectively protect the right of action of the parties. although we do not have the tradition of the rule of law, our culture of

    訴訟法既保障當事人實質意義上的公正，也強調當事人人格尊嚴不受侵犯，實質公正和程序公正並重，因此，訴訟法上的歸責不以行為人給他人造成實際損害為要件，只要行為人實施了違反誠信義務的行為，且主觀上存在過錯，即應承擔違反誠信原則的法律後果。
  18. The civil retrial system plays an important role in judicial practice as a litigation system, but there are contradictions between the current law of the retrial system and actual effect in the practice, structure form and value orientation, which seriously hinder the progress of the civil retrial system

    摘要長期以來，民事再審制度作?一項訴訟制度在司法實踐中發揮著重要的作用，但由於現行再審制度法律條文與實際運行效果之間的矛盾以及其外在結構形式與內在價值取向上的存在矛盾無法得以迅速解決，嚴重地阻凝了民事再審制度改革進程。
  19. The judiciary was not independent, and the lack of due process remained a serious problem

    司法系統並不獨立並且不執行法定訴訟程序仍是一個嚴重的問題。
  20. In conducting criminal proceedings, the people ' s courts, the people ' s procuratorates and the public security organs must strictly observe this law and any relevant stipulations of other laws

    人民法院、人民檢察院和公安機關進行刑事訴訟，必須嚴格遵守本法和其他法律的有關規定。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書