故意侵權 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [gùyìqīnquán]
故意侵權 英文
intentional tort
  • 故 : Ⅰ名詞1 （事故） event; incident; happening; accident 2 （原因） cause; reason 3 （朋友; 友情） fr...
  • 意 : Ⅰ名詞1 （意思） meaning; idea 2 （心愿; 願望） wish; desire; intention 3 （人或事物流露的情態）su...
  • 侵 : Ⅰ動詞（侵入） invade; intrude into; infringe upon Ⅱ形容詞（接近） approaching Ⅲ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 故意 : （有意識地） intentionally; willfully; deliberately; on purpose; go out of one's way to; intent
  1. The important integrants of the infringement implemented by a third party which covers : ( 1 ) the object of infringement is legal and valid creditor ’ s right ; ( 2 ) the behavior is malfeasant ; ( 3 ) behavior main body refers to a third party beyond the debt relationship ; ( 4 ) intent to infringe upon the creditor ’ s right subjectively is necessary ; ( 5 ) there is the result of the damage consequence ; ( 6 ) tortious behavior is the reason of damage consequence

    第三人侵害債權的構成要件有: （ 1 ）被侵害的是合法有效的債權; （ 2 ）有侵害行為且行為具有不法性; （ 3 ）侵害主體只能是債之關系當事人以外的第三人; （ 4 ）主觀狀態為故意; （ 5 ）造成損害結果; （ 6 ）侵權行為與損害結果之間存在因果關系。
  2. It consists of subjective intention or great misfeasance of identifier, illegal identification, result of damages, causality between illegal identification and result of damages

    鑒定人主觀上有故意或重大過失、違法鑒定行為、損害結果、違法鑒定行為與損害結果有因果關系，是這一侵權責任的構成要件。
  3. According to the status quo accredited point of view, concerning the man ' s actus reus and mens rea, his conduct is neither justifiable homicide, nor unpremeditated manslaughter ( negligence or imprudence ), nor mayhem, nor tort, but indirect intentional homicide

    根據目前的通說，考慮到該男子的犯罪客觀方面和犯罪主觀方面，他的行為既不是特別防衛，也不是過失致人死亡（包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失） ，也不是故意傷害，更不是民事侵權行為，而是間接故意殺人。
  4. As to the main points that constitute the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damage, four aspects are included : first, aggression upon one ' s spirit is the presupposition of the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; second, a certain case of spiritual damages is the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; third, the infringer ' s the subjective fault ( intentional or negligent ) is the subjective condition of the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; last, the relationship between the infringer " s action and the case " s consequence should be that between cause and effect, which is the causality condition

    就精神損害賠償責任的構成要件來說，它包括四個方面的內容：第一，精神損害侵權行為是行為人承擔精神損害賠償責任的前提；第二，一定的精神損害事實和後果是承擔精神損害民事責任的客觀要件；第三，侵害人主觀上有過錯（故意和過失）是承擔精神損害賠償責任的主觀條件；第四，精神損害行為和損害後果之間有因果關系是承擔精神損害賠償責任的必要條件。對于精神損害賠償的范圍，世界各國的立法規定大不一樣。
  5. This dissertation, through discussing respectively and researching by comparative method as to the compensation for damages for breach of a contract and for the infringement arising from road traffic accident which is related to serve contract, raises that, there exist mutual part and difference in the scope of damages, the principle of the fixation of liability, the proof of evidence, the rule of the counteraction between faults, the undertaking of the third party for the fault liability, the dealing of the free - rider with good - faith, as to the contract law and tort law in china

    筆者在論文中，通過對具有服務合同關系的道路交通事故的違約損害賠償、侵權損害賠償的分別闡述和比較研究，說明了我國合同法和侵權行為法這兩種法律規范在賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任、過失相抵規則適用、第三人過錯責任承擔、好意同乘者的處理等方面，既有相同之處，也存在諸多差異。
  6. An operator may not adopt the following means to infringe business secrets : obtaining business secrets from the owners of rights by stealing, promising of gain, resorting to coercion or other improper means ; disclosing, using, or allowing others to use business secrets of the owners of rights obtained by the means mentioned in the preceding item

    L締約各方應規定適當和有效的法律補救辦法，制止任何人明知或就民事補救而言有合理根據知道其行為會誘使促成便利或包庇對本條約或伯爾尼公約所涵蓋的任何權利的侵犯而故意從事以下行為：
  7. In the second part, duty as a threshold question in every negligence case is emphasized

    過失作為侵權，是一種同故意侵權、嚴格責任相區分的獨立的侵權責任。
  8. And cpa will be liable for intentional tort liability or civil liability of negligence because of intention or negligence under tort law

    而在侵權法下，注冊會計師因主觀上的故意或過失作出虛假陳述時將承擔故意侵權或者過失侵權民事責任。
  9. Torts can be divided into three categories depending on whether liability is based on intent, on negligence, or is absolute or strict without either intent or negligence

    侵權可根據侵權責任的不同分為三類，故意侵權責任，過失侵權責任，絕對侵權責任或無過錯嚴格侵權責任。
  10. Non - joint injuries are several tortfeasors " torts positing to joint injuries that can hurt others on the base of the combination of wilfulness and faults. joint torts without related faults include joint dangers and non - joint dangers

    非共同加害行為是數行為人基於故意和過失的結合致人損害的侵權行為，是與共同加害行為相對應的一種共同浸權行為。
  11. We respect third partys legitimate intellectual property. no deliberate infringement or improper use. protect clients intellectual property during client service

    我們尊重第三者正當的知識產權，不對其故意侵害或不正當使用，並在為客戶服務過程中嚴格保護客戶的知識產權。
  12. Abstract : the offence of infringing trade secret means the ac t of falsely obtaining, leaking out, using or permitting the other to use the righter ' s trade secret an d having resulted in heavy and great losses to the righter. its subject is mixed subject, containing both certain special subject and certain general subject. its mens rea may be both guilty intention, containing both direct intention and indi r ect intention, and guilty fault, containing both negligent fault and reckless fau l t. on the objective aspect its establishment is not necessarily signed by the “ h aving resulted in heavy and great losses to the righter ”. its direct object is t he righter ' s right to his trade secret, containing the righter ' s special ownin g right or using right and the right of keeping the secret to the trade secret

    文摘:侵犯商業秘密罪是指非法獲取、披露、使用或者允許他人使用權利人的商業秘密，給權利人造成重大損失的行為；其主體是混合主體，既包括一定的特殊主體，又包括一定的一般主體；其主觀方面既可以是故意，包括直接故意和間接故意，又可以是過失，包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失；其在客觀方面並不必然以「給權利人造成重大損失」為成立犯罪的標志；其直接客體是權利人對商業秘密的權利，包括對商業秘密的所有權或使用權以及保密權。
  13. Section one includes the concept and historical development of the crime of occupation ; section two elaborates on the constitution of the crime of occupation, indicating that the object of the crime of occupation refers to the ownership of property of others, and the target of the crime refers to the property taken care of and the left and the hidden property ; as far as the objective factors of the crime of occupation is concerned, it can refer to having done or having - not done, which includes illegal occupation for personal use, refusing to return or refusing to hand over and huge amount. as for the subjective factor, it is intentional for illegal occupation. the subject of the crime refers to the ordinary subject

    全文分為以下四部分:一、侵占罪的概念和歷史沿革，該部分首先對有關侵占罪概念的各種不同表述方式進行分析比較，明確了侵占罪的概念，並結合古今中外刑法中有關侵占罪的立法，全方位詳述了侵占罪的發展沿革;二、侵占罪的犯罪構成，該部分通過對侵占罪的犯罪構成進行詳盡的分析研究，指出侵占罪的客體為他人財物所有權，其犯罪對象為代為保管的他人財物和他人的遺忘物或埋藏物，遺忘物與遺失物不宜作嚴格的區分;就侵占罪客觀方面而言，其行為方式既可以是作為，也可以為不作為，包含非法佔為己有、拒不退還或拒不交出、數額較大三個方面;其主觀方面為故意，並且出於非法佔有的目的;該罪的主體為一般主體。
  14. Although there is no the description of " for the purpose of illegal possession " in the fads about the crime, the crime can not be tenable without the purpose. on the other hand, the crime of fraud on letter of credit leaves from common fraud crime, which is a crime for the purpose of illegal possession with direct intent. on some occasion, there is a division of accomplished cffense and unaccomplished offense in crime of fraud on letter of crfdit. the act of counterfeiting a letter of credit and using it afterwards, and the act of using a noneffec tive credit, and the act of defrauding a bank to open a credit or using fraudulent clause in credit somewhat should be punished seriously by our country ' s criminal law

    信用證詐騙罪所侵犯的客體是國家對信用證的管理制度以及公私財產所有權，其客觀行為表現包括使用偽造、變造的信用證或者附隨的單據、文件進行詐騙活動、使用作廢的信用證進行詐騙活動、騙取信用證進行詐騙活動以及以其他方法進行信用證詐騙活動，信用證詐騙罪的犯罪主體包括自然人和單位，主觀上屬于直接故意，要求行為人具有非法佔有的目的。在司法實踐中，應注意信用證詐騙罪與非罪、與彼罪的區分認定，以及對罪數形態、共同犯罪和既未遂形態的認識。
  15. Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action

    作者指出，董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事，而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外，第三人還包括二些特殊債權人，如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任，但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失，實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外，在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施，以保證公平受償。
  16. Here and now, face to the embarrassment of our country ’ s environment pirate relief question, due to the result of the environment pirate of charter, the author thought offer the punitive damages to the hostile, serious environmental torts. in this way can correct interests to be damaged to compensate the uneven phenomenon with interests in a certain degree. making inflictors undertake punitive damages, can not only recover the damage of the victim ' s material, spirit, but also let the hostile inflictor undertake to resume cost of the ecological environment, raise it infringe cost, weaken its economic base of infringing

    環境侵權救濟中引入懲罰性賠償，在具體制度建構上應當以有故意或重大過失為主觀要件，以侵權人造成損害作為客觀要件;對環境侵權懲罰性的權利人、賠償義務人和具體賠償范圍加以界定;在懲罰性賠償金數額的確定上，以受害人所受的人身、財產、精神損失、環境權益的損失等為基礎，結合加害人主觀惡性大小、法律所期望產生的威懾力等因素加以判決;同時也有必要對懲罰性賠償制定相應的最高限額，並建立專門基金的方式對懲罰性賠償制度加以補充，以期更好地保護受害人的利益、恢復生態環境。
  17. 766 provides that : “ one who intentionally and improperly interferes with the performance of a contract ( except a contract to marry ) between another and a third person by inducing or otherwise causing the third person not to perform the contract, is subject to liability to the other for the pecuniary loss resulting from the failure of the third person to perform the contract

    《美國侵權法重述，第二版》 （ 1977 ）規定了「第三人故意干涉合同履行」 ，其中第766規定：通過引誘而故意或者不適當地干涉他人與第三人之間的合同關系（婚姻合同除外） ，或者致使第三人不履行合同義務，則第三人未履行合同義務而造成的經濟損失則應由干涉方承擔。
  18. We studied the type of joint act of tort, included common injury act, common dangerous act and injuring others in partnership. its intension is that several people have joint fault for damage or joint fault inferred by law, including common intention and common mistake

    研究了共同侵權行為的類型，包括共同加害行為、共同危險行為、合夥致人損害等行為:內涵即數個行為人對損害結果具有共同過錯或法律推定的共同過錯，既包括共同故意，又包括共同過失。
  19. The execution of it must meet four conditions as follow : the public functionaries violate people ' s rights and do damage to them as they perform the special administrative action, the damage is directly caused by the illegal special administrative action, the damages has been covered by the government which assumes the liability to pay for the damages or the government has performed the obligation, the public functionaries has fault in their mind

    行政追償權行使的條件須是行政公務人員的具體行政行為侵犯了相對人的合法權益，並造成損害，行政公務人員違法行為與損害結果有直接因果關系，行政賠償義務機關已向受害人支付了賠償費用或履行了賠償義務，行政公務人員主觀上須有故意或重大過失。
  20. The bureau that keep watch reminds consumption, if encounter following item but to superintendency department complaint handling : business of insurance of insurance device and agency of insurance individual agent breaks the law mediumly, violate compasses act ; create insurance device illegally ; run insurance wu or insurance intermediary business illegally ; as a result of insurance company sale member intended in the process that exhibit property or error, misdirect consumer or enroach on insurance join the action of right beneficial ; the irregularity of insurance device and its branch chief, violate compasses act ; shenzhen protects inspect bureau the staff member breaks the law, violate discipline and act of neglect one ' s duty ; the criticism that works to insurance, opinion and proposal ; other concerned enroach on is sure to join the action of right beneficial

    保監局提醒消費，假如碰到下列事項可向監管部門投訴處理：保險機構及保險個人代理人經辦保險業務中的違法、違規行為；非法設立保險機構；非法經營保險業務或保險中介業務；由於保險公司營銷員在展業過程中故意或過失，誤導消費者或侵害保險合法權益的行為；保險機構及其分支機構負責人的違法、違規行為；深圳保監局工作人員違法、違紀和失職行為；對保險工作的批評、意見和建議；其他有關侵害保險合法權益的行為。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書