李約瑟 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [lǐyāosè]
李約瑟
英文
joseph needham-
What was his relationship with joseph needham like
他同李約瑟的關系如何？Commemoration to the 100th formal birthday of dr. jeseph needham
紀念李約瑟博士華誕100周年Cherish the memory of great master of joseph needham
懷念大師李約瑟Needham research institute
李約瑟研究所Evaluating joseph needham ' s hard problem from the wavelet multiscale viewpoint
從小波多尺度思想看李約瑟難題爭鳴的現實意義Joseph needham home page
漢學家李約瑟Joseph needham and cultural and educational exchanges between china and britain in modern history
李約瑟與近代中英文化教育交流What are his views on the current situation and future of the needham research institute
他對李約瑟研究所的現狀與未來有何看法？Succeeding joseph needham and ho peng yoke, in 2003 christopher cullen became director of the needham research institute
摘要繼李約瑟、何丙郁之後，古克禮於2003年就任劍橋李約瑟研究所所長。Firstly, on the basis of analysis of needham ' s own investigation method and premise, the paper makes a study on the various solutions to needham ' s problem both at home and abroad. with regard to its deficiencies, it further explains the possibility and feasibility of nonlinear study upon the problem and makes a philosophical analysis of the nonlinear explanation
在對李約瑟本人的研究思路和前提假設利弊評析的基礎上，對國內外「李約瑟難題」的解決方案進行了分析；進而，針對其不足，闡明了非線性研究視角轉向的可能性和現實性，並求華才嘗頤星早蓉靈「孕洶久琴磁題」劣淤鰭邏澎尹對非線性解釋進行了哲學分析。A nonlinear study on the joseph needham ' s problem the joseph needham ' s problem, certainly viewed as a current focus, has made the researchers from east to west greatly interested in the research of the science and technology history and the cultural contrast between the west and the east. there have been various tentative solutions to the problem including skeptics and analysis. as far as general direction of research and methods is concerned, however, there still exist some irrational aspects of those study, i. e. the discussion of the problem is either in a state of controversies without any breakthrough or is deviated to some trivial conclusions
在中西科技文化比較和科技史的研究中， 「李約瑟難題」無疑是一個亮點，倍受中西方學者青睞，對該問題嘗試性地解決以及種種質疑和分析也層出不窮，但就其總體研究方向和方法而言，也仍然存在不少不盡合理之處，對該問題的討論或處于重復爭論、缺乏新的進展的膠著狀態，或被引申到與初始目的相距甚遠的一些枝節性的結論上。Among others, there are joseph needham, lu gwei - djen, nathan sivin, paul unschuld, kiyoshi yabuutyi and other celebrated foreign scholars. it has won favorable comments
十余年來，僅接待國外及港澳臺學者及來賓達數百人，其中包括李約瑟魯桂珍席文藪內清文樹德等國際著名學者，深得各界人士好評。Using the 1940s ' diary of chu ko - chen ' s, then president of chekiang university, which has been published in its entirety only recently, this paper attempts to examine the detailed times, places and situations of the meetings between chu and needham during that period
摘要主要依據新近公開的竺可楨日記中的第一手資料，對20世紀40年代竺可楨與李約瑟之間的互動關系作一初步探討。Joseph needham from england pointed out, “ among mathematicians in the ming dynasty, cheng dawei was the most notable
英國李約瑟說： 「在明代數學家當中，最引人注目的是程大位。 」In the form of a memoir, this autobiography is well worth reading, for it contains a great deal of first - hand information concerning the overseas studies on chinese science and technology over the past fifty years, but also because of ho ' s close relationship with joseph needham and the needham research institute, and in addition because it presents a full picture of his own remarkable character
這本回憶錄非常值得一讀，不僅因為書中包含了大量的第一手資料和珍貴信息，有助於我們了解海外中國科技史研究近五十年來的發展，尤其是有關李約瑟研究所近年來的發展動向及其背景，更因為從這本書，我們可以深切地感受到一位海外學人對中國科技史研究長達半個世紀的執著和眷戀之情。Academic exchanges between drs. joseph talking with the expert of the institute is the needham and lu gwei - djen, both celebrated famous japanese sinologist domei yakazu specialists of history of science and technology, and medical historians of the academy
英國著名科技史專家李約瑟博士魯日本著名漢醫學家矢數道明先生桂珍博士與我院醫史專家進行學術交流與我所中醫文獻專家進行學術交流And in addition, the paper explores the aspects of internal fluctuation, which is viewed as the random choices of the cognitive subject, how it is depend on the initial conditions and is enlarged by the method of positive feedback with step by step on the views of the nature, material outlook and thought modes. what ' s more, under the controls of the nonlinear interactions, the paper respectively explores the development principle in the culture of technology and science between the west and the east on the aspect of attractors and the order parameters, which result from the cooperation and competition. finally, the paper correctly formulates the different value preference in accord with the attractors and the order parameters, and focuses respectively on the traditions of the eastern pragmatic preference and the western contemplative preference and technological preference
在此基礎上，從東西方科技文化的發生和起源入手，從耗散結構的觀點出發，考察了認知主體的隨機性選擇這種文化的內漲落因素，是怎樣依託于各自不同的初始條件?地理氣候條件，在自然觀、物質觀和思想模式方面一步步得到正反饋式的放大;進而，在文化系統內部種種非線性的相互作用下，從競爭和協同所必然產生的序參量和吸引子兩個方面，分別考察了東西方科技文化不同的發展規律，聚焦東方的實用化取向和西方的思辨化、技術化取向的影響機制，從它們在不同時期所發揮的不同作用正面回答了「李約瑟難題」 。Chinese scholars ' studies on the joseph needham puzzle can offer much enlightenment, especial on how to do academic researches, how to recognize the academic standard and value and how to do researches with a scientific attitude
我國學術界對「李約瑟難題」的研究對於我們如何進行學術研究，如何正確認識學術標準和學術價值，以科學的態度研究學術具有重要的借鑒意義。Inspired by the “ needham question ”, this essay argues that, if research. htm focuses switch from the negative question “ why modern science did not happen in china ” to the positive question “ why china was more efficient in applying knowledge about nature to human needs ”, then we can develop social and culturally oriented studies of chinese science
本文從「李約瑟問題」得到啟發，認為如果把注意力從反問題「近代科學為什麼沒有在中國發生」轉移到正問題「為什麼中國文明在把人類對自然界的知識應用於人類實際需要上比西方文明更有效得多」上來，則可以發展社會學與文化取向的中國科學史研究。Inspired by the “ needham question ”, this essay argues that, if research focuses switch from the negative question “ why modern science did not happen in china ” to the positive question “ why china was more efficient in applying knowledge about nature to human needs ”, then we can develop social and culturally oriented studies of chinese science
本文從「李約瑟問題」得到啟發，認為如果把注意力從反問題「近代科學為什麼沒有在中國發生」轉移到正問題「為什麼中國文明在把人類對自然界的知識應用於人類實際需要上比西方文明更有效得多」上來，則可以發展社會學與文化取向的中國科學史研究。分享友人