民事審判權 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [mínshìshěnpànquán]
民事審判權 英文
civil jurisdiction
  • 民 : Ⅰ名詞1 （人民） the people 2 （某族的人） a member of a nationality 3 （從事某種職業的人） a pers...
  • 事 : 名1 （事情） matter; affair thing; business 2 （事故） trouble; accident 3 （職業;工作） job; wor...
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 民事 : [法律] relating to civil law; civil民事案件 civil case; 民事財產關系 civil property relations; 民...
  1. The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive

    民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁判錯誤的法定程序，雖然它不是案件審理的必經程序，也不是訴訟的獨立審級，但其對保護當事人合法權益，保障司法公正，發揮了積極作用，但由於現在有些審判監督程序規定的過于原則，或不完整不合理，實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范，在一定程度上也阻礙了審判監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。
  2. The development of the right path of the reform of the civil adjudication system, the reasonable solution of modern litigation as well as the present state of the cultural cultivation, law cultivation of the citizens in our country decide that it is a realistic urgency for china to set up the hermeneutic right

    其認為民事審判制度改革向正確方向的發展，現代訴訟的合理解決，以及我國公民文化素質，法律素質的現狀等社會情勢決定了我國建立釋明權具有現實的緊迫性。第五部分：我國釋明權制度的建構。
  3. I hope the article benefit the judicial practice. the article includes four parts. the first and second chapters research the definition and history of interest measurement, also the principles, analyze the certainty and effects of interest measurement in the civil adjudication. the third, at the same time, discusses the application in civil ajudication and divide the process into three parts : investigation and analysis of interest, interest measurement, and reasoning and correcting of interest

    本文共分為四章，第一、二章分別考察了利益衡量的歷史淵源、涵義以及利益衡量的原則，分析了利益衡量在民事審判中的必然性及其功效，第三章著重對利益衡量在民事審判中運用的具體過程進行了探討，把利益衡量的過程分為三個階段: （一） 、利益的調查分析; （二） 、利益的權衡與選擇; （三） 、結論的論證與修正。
  4. If we try to trace back the origin, the fact that there exists the hermeneutic right system both in anglo - american genealogy of law and continental genealogy of law has its root in the fact that any civil actions are faced with the problem of how to deal with the relation between the court and the contesting parties, and the hermeneutic right is just the demarcation line between the action spheres on these two sides, the problem of how to deal with the relation between the court and the contesting parties bears more importance and necessity to china, which is now promoting the reform of the ways and manner of civil adjudication and which is now in the period of undergoing changes, upon the above - mentioned considerations, the thesis attempts the study of the hermeneutic right system

    如果再追溯的話，英美法系，大陸法系之所以都有釋明權制度，歸根在於任何民事訴訟都面臨如何定位法院和當事人之間關系的問題，而釋明權恰恰是它們活動范圍的涇渭之線。如何定位法院和當事人之間的關系，對于正在進行民事審判方式改革，處于轉型時期的我國更顯得必要，基於以上考慮，文章決定對釋明權制度展開一些研究。全文分為引言、正文、結語三大部分。
  5. The first chapter was titled " positive study of the trial power ", the second chapter " guiding thought to renew the idea of the civil trial power ", and the third " practical guarantee to exercise the civil trial power independently and impartially : profession morality of the trial subject ". the latter part was to illustrate one by one the basic parts of the civil trail power, consisting of the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters

    第一章為《審判權的實證考察入第二章為《民事審判權理念更新的指導思想入第三章為《民事審判權獨立公正行使之實踐保障：審判主體的職業道德入下篇則主要就民事審判權的基本構造進行了逐一的解析，包括第四章、第五章及第六章。
  6. The fact that cases of ipr have been divided into three types and accepted by three division ( civil, criminal, and administrative ) respectively, cannot satisfy the needs to protect ipr actively and then to make our citizens more creative

    摘要我國目前由刑事審判庭、民事審判庭和行政審判庭分別審理相關知識產權案件的知識產權司法保護模式，已不能適應積極保護知識產權、建設創新型國家的需要。
  7. On the boundary between judicature application of constitution and civil jurisdiction

    論憲法的司法適用與民事審判權的界限
  8. This is the first paper in our country for doctor degree that studied systematically the civil trial power

    本文是我國國內第一篇系統研究民事審判權的博士學位論文。
  9. The first part was to give a general study of the civil trial power, consisting of the first, second and third chapters

    其中上篇主要是對民事審判權進行一般性的考察，包括第一、第二及第三章。
  10. Although circles of both the theory and the judicial practice have been conscious of these problems, and had begun to reform the civil trial style boldly and ail - roundly more than 10 years before, owing to lack of systematical theory and the conformity of the system ; the result is that not only some of the reform doings haven " t achieved the reformers " original intension, but also due to too much roundabout course the reform itself has taken, the result is that the reform cost rose and a great deal of judicial resources wasted

    盡管司法實務界及理論界也意識到了這些問題，並在十幾年前便開始對民事審判權運行中的審判方式開始了大刀闊斧和全方位的改革，但由於沒有系統的理論和制度整合為指導和依託，因此，致使一些改革措施不僅沒有能夠實現改革者們的初衷，而且由於改革本身走了太多的彎路，又導致了改革成本的增大，由此並浪費了大量的司法資源。
  11. Upon this, the writer himself, to take his own meager knowledge, try to search for some rational internal cores for the reform of the civil trial style, civil trial system, civil procedure system and even the whole judicial system, from the source of 5 the theory and system, that is, the " civil trial power

    正是基於此，作者於是不揣淺陋，力圖從理論和制度層面的源頭，即「民事審判權」上來為民事審判方式、民事審判制度、民事訴訟制度乃至整個司法制度的改革找尋到一些合理的內核。
  12. The fourth chapter was under the title of " fact - affirmation power ", the fifth " law - application power ", and the sixth " proceeding - direction power ". in the first chapter " positive study of the trial power ", beginning with the basic meaning of the civil trial power, the writer gave a brief clearance of the historical development sequence of the trial power ; and upon this, he gave his own opinions about the system guarantee and reform of the moving of the civil trial power. he viewed that as for the guarantee, whe

    認為，就我國現行民事審判權運行的制度保障而言，無論是其中的組織制度，還是人事制度，抑或是活動制度都不同程度地存有問題，因此，對組織制度和人事制度應進行相應的變革，而對活動制度則應進一步地落實與完善；同時並認為，對包括民事審判制度在內的司法體制的改革應有統一的領導機構來進行部署和協調，以確保改革的成功。
  13. As we know, civil trial power is a very important part of the trial power system in a country, at the time of " administrating the country by operation of law " and constructing the socialist market economy, it can be said that whether the civil trial power can be exercised legally, independently, impartially and appropriately or not will have to do with directly the realization of the administration of law and the construction of the socialist market economy

    我們知道，民事審判權是一國審判權體系中極其重要的組成部分，在「依法治國」及建立社會主義市場經濟的今天，可以說民事審判權的是否依法、獨立、公正與適當行使將直接關涉到法治的能否實現及市場經濟的能否建立。但圃于歷史的、傳統的及其他方面主、客觀因素的制約與影響，以往我國對於民事審判權的行使效果並不盡如人意。
  14. This thesis put forward four core categories in civil procedure law which are litigious right, litigious duty, judicial function and judicial duty of civil procedure by thinking about the traditional “ litigation right ? ? litigation duty ” pattern and “ lawsuit right ? ? jurisdiction power ” pattern repeatedly and analyse their defects. meanwhile this thesis analyse their relationship especially the relationship between the judicial right of civil procedure, judicial duty of civil procedure and judicial power of civil procedure deeply

    本文通過對傳統的「民事訴訟權利? ?民事訴訟義務」模式和「民事訴權? ?民事審判權」模式的重新思考，剖析其不足，提出民事訴訟權利、民事訴訟義務、民事訴訟職權、民事訴訟職責是民事訴訟法學的內在聯系的四個核心范疇，並就其關系特別是民事訴訟職權和民事訴訟職責的關系進行了深入的分析。
  15. In the treatise, the author believes that civil procedure for trial supervision is a procedure that people ' s procuratorate, on the basis of legal supervision rights, or a party to an action, on the basis of rights to apply for retrial, finds that there is error in a legally effective judgment or mediation agreement made by a people ' s court and asks for the court to retrial

    筆者認為，民事審判監督程序是指人民檢察院基於法律監督權，當事人基於再審申請權，認為人民法院已生效的民事判決或調解協議確有錯誤，依照法定程序，要求人民法院並由人民法院依法對該案件進行再審的程序。
  16. Article 14 the people ' s procuratorates shall have the right to exercise legal supervision over civil proceedings

    第十四條人民檢察院有權對民事審判活動實行法律監督。
  17. This problem results in the confusion of the judges in determining the legality of the evidence in the practice of the civil proceedings, and therefore the different conclusion when determining the same evidence by different judges or courts, which greatly affects the authority of the judiciary. this paper focuses on the practical issues occurred in the content of the authentication, its principle, its standard and the guidelines., it starts from the definition and content of the authentication with respect to the theoretical research in the issues of authentication and the relevant judicial practice in china, first, it makes clear what authentication is, that is, the definition, characteristics and content of the authentication

    這些問題造成民事審判實踐中法官認證活動的混亂，導致不同法官或不同法院對同樣證據的認定結論卻不相同，嚴重影響了司法的權威性。本文側重於認證內容、認證原則、認證標準、認證規則中存在的具體問題，結合我國關于認證的理論研究及司法審判實踐，從認證的涵義、內容入手，首先明確什麼是認證即認證的概念、特徵、內容，然後分析認證制度的價值是什麼
  18. With the process of resolution of difficulty of civil enforcement and rectification of disorder of enforcement, civil enforcement procedure reform have been taken into account by courts as a part of civil judicial procedure reform, and the enactment of civil enforcement law has been one of focuses of discussion and investigation both in theories and in practice, however, reform of civil enforcement organization and rebuild enforcement power is critical issue in civil enforcement procedure reform and in the enactment of civil enforcement law

    伴隨著解決民事「執行難」和整治民事「執行亂」運動的深入，民事執行方式改革已經納入法院大民事審判方式改革的議程，對民事強制執行予以單獨立法也開始成為理論界和實務界討論的熱點問題之一，而如何對民事執行權進行正確配置是進行執行方式改革和進行民事強制執行單獨立法的核心課題。
  19. Under this system, there should be concrete regulations regarding filing of p rosecution by the prosecutorial organs against citizens, legal persons and other organizations over major civil illegal activities, regulations of the participation of civil lawsuits by prosecutorial organs, regulations of appeal against effective or non - effective civil rulings, regulations of punishment of malpractice committed in the capacity of a judge during civil proceedings, etc. all the above interrelated and interactive regulations form a complete set of civil prosecutorial system with focus on civil prosecutorial power

    這個系統的具體制度內容應當包括，檢察機關對公民、法人、其他組織實施的重大民事違法行為的起訴制度，檢察機關參加民事訴訟的制度，檢察機關對未生效和已生效的民事判決的抗訴制度，以及對民事審判活動中發生的法官司法職務犯罪的查處制度等。它們相互聯系，相互作用，共同構成了以民事檢察權為核心內容的民事檢察制度的完整內容。
  20. Process of civil judgment supervision can correct mistake of judgment, protect legal rights of parties, and achieve just judicature

    民事審判監督程序作為一種救濟性的案件審理程序，對于糾正審判錯誤，保護當事人合法權益，實現司法公正，具有積極的作用。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書