民事審判 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [mínshìshěnpàn]
民事審判 英文
civil justice
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (人民) the people 2 (某族的人) a member of a nationality 3 (從事某種職業的人) a pers...
  • : 名1 (事情) matter; affair thing; business 2 (事故) trouble; accident 3 (職業;工作) job; wor...
  • : Ⅰ形容詞(詳細; 周密) careful Ⅱ動詞1 (審查) examine; go over 2 (審訊) interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (分開; 分辨) distinguish; discriminate 2 (評定) judge; decide 3 (判決) sentence; con...
  • 民事 : [法律] relating to civil law; civil民事案件 civil case; 民事財產關系 civil property relations; 民...
  1. During the civil war, writs of habeas corpus were ignored, and civil trials gave way to military trials.

    南北戰爭時期,人身保護法遭到踐踏,民事審判被軍訊所代替。
  2. The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive

    民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁錯誤的法定程序,雖然它不是案件理的必經程序,也不是訴訟的獨立級,但其對保護當人合法權益,保障司法公正,發揮了積極作用,但由於現在有些監督程序規定的過于原則,或不完整不合理,實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范,在一定程度上也阻礙了監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。
  3. The center of civil judicial reformation is to reappraise the value of civil litigation procedure

    民事審判方式改革的核心問題就是要重新評價程序價值。
  4. ( 5 ) being a supervenient supervisory measure of the civil procedure, the civil protest should coordinate with the public prosecution and opinions of the prosecutors, which together forms one unique supervision system

    抗訴制度是對民事審判活動的一種「後監督」 ,抗訴制度應注意與公訴和檢察意見制度相銜接,形成完整的監督體系。
  5. Finally, the author puts forward his rough views on the reconstruction of several issues concerning civil adjudication supervision procedure

    最後,筆者對民事審判監督程序的幾個主要問題的重構提出了自己的粗淺看法。
  6. Civil adjudication supervision procedure is an important part of china ' s trial system. studying and probing the connotation, function and jurisprudence basis of the system is beneficial to objectively recognize, evaluate and upgrade china ' s current judicial system. moreover, it is also beneficial to the research and development of china ' s system of action

    民事審判監督程序是我國制度的重要的組成部分,研究和探討該制度的涵義、功能和法理基礎等,有利於客觀認識、評價和完善我國當前的司法體制,有利於我國訴訟體制的研究和發展。
  7. The main contents of the reform of trial preceding in economic case is the reform of the system of the evidence. adjustment of the standard of proof in chinese is to built dualistic system for procedural standard of proof. so the proof on the balance of probabilities will be the procedural standard in chinese civil procedure

    我國目前正在進行的民事審判方式改革,主要是證據制度方面的改革,以形成符合我國國情的證明標準,本文試從對證明標準概念,證明標準在證據制度上的意義和證明標準模式的評析,揭示我國奉引的一元制證明標準的弊端,並結合國情,得出我國應建立高度蓋然性的證明標準的結論,並指出該證明標準在實踐中的可行性和相應的配套制度的建設。
  8. The development of the right path of the reform of the civil adjudication system, the reasonable solution of modern litigation as well as the present state of the cultural cultivation, law cultivation of the citizens in our country decide that it is a realistic urgency for china to set up the hermeneutic right

    其認為民事審判制度改革向正確方向的發展,現代訴訟的合理解決,以及我國公文化素質,法律素質的現狀等社會情勢決定了我國建立釋明權具有現實的緊迫性。第五部分:我國釋明權制度的建構。
  9. I hope the article benefit the judicial practice. the article includes four parts. the first and second chapters research the definition and history of interest measurement, also the principles, analyze the certainty and effects of interest measurement in the civil adjudication. the third, at the same time, discusses the application in civil ajudication and divide the process into three parts : investigation and analysis of interest, interest measurement, and reasoning and correcting of interest

    本文共分為四章,第一、二章分別考察了利益衡量的歷史淵源、涵義以及利益衡量的原則,分析了利益衡量在民事審判中的必然性及其功效,第三章著重對利益衡量在民事審判中運用的具體過程進行了探討,把利益衡量的過程分為三個階段: (一) 、利益的調查分析; (二) 、利益的權衡與選擇; (三) 、結論的論證與修正。
  10. It is the outcome of a kind of modem high technology to measure lie technology, the application that we can not exclude it absolutely in civil adjudication, make it dissociate besides the program of civil procedure, can not also deify it, is regard as it to break through the hand of buddhist temple of the deadlock of civil procedure jian

    摘要測謊技術是一種現代高科技的產物,我們既不能絕對排斥其在民事審判中的應用,使其游離於訴訟程序之外,也不能將其「神化」 ,將其視為沖破訴訟僵局的剎手銅。
  11. If we try to trace back the origin, the fact that there exists the hermeneutic right system both in anglo - american genealogy of law and continental genealogy of law has its root in the fact that any civil actions are faced with the problem of how to deal with the relation between the court and the contesting parties, and the hermeneutic right is just the demarcation line between the action spheres on these two sides, the problem of how to deal with the relation between the court and the contesting parties bears more importance and necessity to china, which is now promoting the reform of the ways and manner of civil adjudication and which is now in the period of undergoing changes, upon the above - mentioned considerations, the thesis attempts the study of the hermeneutic right system

    如果再追溯的話,英美法系,大陸法系之所以都有釋明權制度,歸根在於任何訴訟都面臨如何定位法院和當人之間關系的問題,而釋明權恰恰是它們活動范圍的涇渭之線。如何定位法院和當人之間的關系,對于正在進行民事審判方式改革,處于轉型時期的我國更顯得必要,基於以上考慮,文章決定對釋明權制度展開一些研究。全文分為引言、正文、結語三大部分。
  12. The first chapter was titled " positive study of the trial power ", the second chapter " guiding thought to renew the idea of the civil trial power ", and the third " practical guarantee to exercise the civil trial power independently and impartially : profession morality of the trial subject ". the latter part was to illustrate one by one the basic parts of the civil trail power, consisting of the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters

    第一章為《權的實證考察入第二章為《民事審判權理念更新的指導思想入第三章為《民事審判權獨立公正行使之實踐保障:主體的職業道德入下篇則主要就民事審判權的基本構造進行了逐一的解析,包括第四章、第五章及第六章。
  13. Civil judicial officer

    民事審判人員
  14. The fact that cases of ipr have been divided into three types and accepted by three division ( civil, criminal, and administrative ) respectively, cannot satisfy the needs to protect ipr actively and then to make our citizens more creative

    摘要我國目前由刑庭、民事審判庭和行政庭分別理相關知識產權案件的知識產權司法保護模式,已不能適應積極保護知識產權、建設創新型國家的需要。
  15. Abstract : the previous listen procedure of civil trial is very necessary to sort out the disputed points, to define the facts and evidence, to guide the persons concerned to give their proofs, to stop the disputation, and to do what is necessary for smoothly civil trial previous

    文摘:民事審判庭前聽證,能夠清理爭議焦點,明確有爭議的實和證據,指導當人舉證,便於止息紛爭,為順利庭作好充分準備.這是非常必要的
  16. On the boundary between judicature application of constitution and civil jurisdiction

    論憲法的司法適用與民事審判權的界限
  17. This is the first paper in our country for doctor degree that studied systematically the civil trial power

    本文是我國國內第一篇系統研究民事審判權的博士學位論文。
  18. The first part was to give a general study of the civil trial power, consisting of the first, second and third chapters

    其中上篇主要是對民事審判權進行一般性的考察,包括第一、第二及第三章。
  19. Although circles of both the theory and the judicial practice have been conscious of these problems, and had begun to reform the civil trial style boldly and ail - roundly more than 10 years before, owing to lack of systematical theory and the conformity of the system ; the result is that not only some of the reform doings haven " t achieved the reformers " original intension, but also due to too much roundabout course the reform itself has taken, the result is that the reform cost rose and a great deal of judicial resources wasted

    盡管司法實務界及理論界也意識到了這些問題,並在十幾年前便開始對民事審判權運行中的方式開始了大刀闊斧和全方位的改革,但由於沒有系統的理論和制度整合為指導和依託,因此,致使一些改革措施不僅沒有能夠實現改革者們的初衷,而且由於改革本身走了太多的彎路,又導致了改革成本的增大,由此並浪費了大量的司法資源。
  20. Upon this, the writer himself, to take his own meager knowledge, try to search for some rational internal cores for the reform of the civil trial style, civil trial system, civil procedure system and even the whole judicial system, from the source of 5 the theory and system, that is, the " civil trial power

    正是基於此,作者於是不揣淺陋,力圖從理論和制度層面的源頭,即「民事審判權」上來為民事審判方式、民事審判制度、訴訟制度乃至整個司法制度的改革找尋到一些合理的內核。
分享友人