法律責任客體 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎlǜzérènkètǐ]
法律責任客體
英文
object of legal responsibility- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 律 : Ⅰ名1 (法律; 規則) law; rule; statute; regulation 2 (律詩的簡稱) short for lüshi 3 (姓氏) a ...
- 責 : Ⅰ名詞(責任) duty; responsibility Ⅱ動詞1 (要求做成某事或行事達到一定標準) demand; ask for; req...
- 任 : 任名詞(姓氏) a surname
- 體 : 體構詞成分。
- 法律 : law; statute法律保護 legal protection; 法律程序 legal procedure; 法律承認 de jure recognition (...
- 責任 : 1. (應做的事) duty; responsibility 2. (應承擔的過失) responsibility for a fault or wrong; blame
-
Firstly, some basic concepts are not clear, such as what is the status of the company under liquidation, how to define the action of the industrial - commercial authority ' s invalidation of the license of the company, whether or not the share holders can sue to disincorporate the company, is it legal to dissolve a company without liquidation, what is special liquidation, under what situation will a company be obliged to disincorporate, who will be responsible for liquidation after the dis incorporation, etc. secondly, some primary legislative principles about disincorporation and liquidation that are adopted in foreign countries are not established in china, such as a company must be liquidated before disincorporation except for acquisition, the company remains valid during the liquidation until it finishes the invalidation registration, an ordinary liquidation must be replaced by a special liquidation under the instruction of the court when there is an impediment or a fraud, the company should apply to the court for bankruptcy when it is found that its debt is over its asset during the liquidation, the number of people execute liquidation can be several or just one, companies applied for annulment shall be judged by the court and must be liquidated, etc. thirdly, china does n ' t have some of the fundamental rules that are specified in the laws of foreign countries, such as the rule of disincorporation registration, the rule that the company should sue to let the court judge for disincorporation if there is a deadlock between share holders, the rule of credit trade - off in special liquidation, the rule that people who execute the liquidation are jointly responsible for compensating the loss of the third party caused by their activities that are illegal or vicious, the rule of special liquidation, the rule of the representation of the people who execute the liquidation, the rule of the court supervising the liquidation in an inactive way, the rule of how long the accounts and documents should be kept after disincorporation, etc. because of the lack in research and legislation, the system for companies leaving the market is highly disorganized, which harmed the interest of the creditors and relevant people, increased the risk of market exchange, damaged the order of the market economy and the ethic of doing business, wasted the resources of the society, and impaired the authority and seriousness of the law
再次,國外立法上的一些基本制度我國沒有,如解散登記制度,股東出現僵局訴請法院判決解散制度,特別清算中的債權協定製度,清算人因違法或惡意對第三人承擔連帶賠償責任制度,司法特別清算制度,清算人的代表性制度,法院消極監督清算制度,帳薄及文件在公司解散后保存法定期限制度等。由於理論研究和立法的不足,造成了我國公司法人退出市場機制的嚴重混亂,損害了債權人和利害關系人的利益,增加了市場主體交易不安全感,破壞了市場經濟秩序和商業道德,浪費了社會資源,削弱了法律的權威性和嚴肅性。文章認為,完善我國公司解散和清算制度,應借鑒和引進發達國家的法學理論和法律制度,統一我國有關解散和清算立法,在基本概念、基本原則、基本制度、基本程序諸方面進行統一規范,填補立法空白,創設法院解散公司制度,廢除行政特別清算制度代之以司法特別清算制度,健全和嚴格違反清算規定的法律責任制度(包括民事責任,刑事責任,行政責任,改變現行行政處罰范圍偏廣,民事賠償范圍偏窄,刑事追究空白太多的不協調狀況) ,從而構築起科學的公司解散和清算制度,使之符合我國經濟生活的客觀需求,符合市場經濟發展的基本方向,並與國外立法通例趨同。The objective aspect of the crime behaves that during the medical treatment, the subject of the crime breaks the regulations concerning that and grossly neglects his duty, which causes death or severe harm to the health of the patient. the conviction of the causation in this crime is difficult and crucial
就本罪客觀方面來看,該罪發生在醫療活動中,表現為犯罪主體違反有關醫療衛生法律、行政法規、部門規章、診療護理常規、有關習慣常理及醫德的嚴重不負責任的作為或不作為,並由此導致了就診人死亡或身體健康嚴重受損的實害結果。It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason
論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多,相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出,如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士,翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物,由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多,但在《民事證據法(草案) 》的擬定過程中,並未采責任倒置的地位,這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇,誠然,舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險,而「倒置」規則的設計,則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼,在理解何為舉證責任倒置時,本文著重以民事法為主線,指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任,而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔,舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異,但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值,在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形,一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形,而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件,對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定,若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證,在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時,從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則,公平原則,訴訟經濟原則,保護弱者原則等,基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念,其次立法應避免求大求全,再次要配合實體法的發展,最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。Object of legal responsibility
法律責任客體That is, namely the existence of liability insurance is specially for the insured who undertakes the responsibility for the third person suffering loss and its basic goal is to compensate the third person. along with the development, people realize gradually the concept that the strong benefits at the cost of the disadvantaged can hardly be regarded as equitable. taking the development of civil liability system and the breakthrough in the relativity principle of the contract as its legal basis, liability insurance is renewing its concept continually and starts to have dual function to protect both the insured and the third person, attaching more importance to the third person
本文立足我國國情,借鑒國外經驗,以現代責任保險的新理念為基本思考路徑,客觀分析我國責任保險立法對第三人保護的現狀,積極探討對第三人予以保護和救濟的途徑,建議在我國保險法中建立第三人直接請求權制度和事故賠償基金制度,進一步推行強制責任保險,擴展責任保險的適用范圍以及明確規范保險人、被保險人對第三人應當履行的義務,從整體到局部、從制度到措施,力求全面、有效地構築我國責任保險第三人法律保護的屏障,充分實現責任保險基本的制度價值。Based on trips agreement in wto, legislation and prosecution adjustment in copyright protection were emphatically researched during china entering into wto. legislation adjustment was embodied in revision of copyright law. object and scope of copyright protection were extended and rights of copyright person and neighboring right person were increased in the new copyright law
基於wto中的trips協議,重點研究了加入wto前後我國著作權保護立法和執法的調整,立法的調整主要體現在著作權法的修訂,新的著作權法擴大了著作權的保護客體和保護范圍,增加了著作權人和鄰接權所有者的權利,縮小了著作權權利的限制范圍,嚴格了法律責任,信息網路傳播權和數據庫等匯編作品納入保護范圍,同時加強了行政和司法執法力度。Dr neoh is a senior member of the bar, and has been chairman of the hong kong securities and futures commission as well as the chief adviser to the china securities regulatory commission. dr neoh is currently nomura visiting professor of international financial systems at harvard law school. he is also visiting professor in many major universities in mainland china, including peking and tsinghua
法律學院的具體籌備工作將由籌劃委員會負責,籌劃委員會由大學校董、執業資深大律師梁定邦博士出任主席;梁博士曾任香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會主席及中國證券監督管理委員會的首席顧問,現為哈佛大學法律學院nomura國際金融體系客座教授( nomuravisitingprofessorofinternationalfinancialsystems ) ,並為中國內地多間著名學府,包括北京大學及清華大學的客座教授。I if the customer is a corporate entity is duly incorporated with limited liability and validly existing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation ; that the memorandum and articles of association certificate of incorporation and by - laws of the customer contain provisions which authorize the customer to execute, deliver and perform these terms and that all necessary corporate or other action has been taken to authorize such execution, delivery and performance
此等條件將不會違反管制客戶之任何法律法案命令裁決或其他要求所載之任何規定,亦不會違反客戶為立約之一方之任何按揭信託契約協議或其他文據中所載之任何規定或構成其他違約及i倘若客戶是法人團體,它是根據其注冊成立司法管轄權區中之法律,正式注冊成立為有限責任公司並有效存在客戶之組織章程大綱及細則公司注冊證明書及附則所載授權客戶簽訂交付及履行此等條款之規定及所有必需之法人或其他行動已予以執行,以授權上述簽訂交付及履行。分享友人