潛力上均等的 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qiánshàngjūnděngde]
潛力上均等的 英文
equipotential
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (隱在水下) go underwater; hide under water; dive 2 (隱藏) hide3 [書面語](涉水) wade ...
  • : Ⅰ名1 (力量; 能力) power; strength; ability; capacity 2 [物理學] (改變物體運動狀態的作用) forc...
  • : 上名詞[語言學] (指上聲) falling-rising tone
  • : Ⅰ形容詞(均勻) equal; even Ⅱ副詞(都; 全) without exception; all
  • : Ⅰ量詞1 (等級) class; grade; rank 2 (種; 類) kind; sort; type Ⅱ形容詞(程度或數量上相同) equa...
  • : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 潛力 : latent capacity; potential; potentiality
  • 均等 : 1. (平均; 相等) equal; impartial; fair 2. [植物學] equalling; parity
  1. Part iiilegal issues upon the reform of toll and tax in countryside this part is concentrated to show six problems that the reform of toll and tax in countryside is to be up against and is to be peremptorily settled as following : the first one, in the confirming of agricultural tax, it is very difficult to protect the farmer ' s rights fairly because of unscientific of the evidence at assessment, highly of tax rate, and the absence of law and statute correlatively ; the second one, on the tax levying, there lack of legal systems that is to supervise and run, especially lack of law and statute which lead to collect agricultural special tax canonically ; the third one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside extrudes unbalance burden among farmers and countries, and lead to unevenly between subject of tax payment, which breaches the legal rule of balanceable tax ; the fourth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside faces the danger that farmers " burden tends to rebound because of weakly carry through legal rule on tax statutory and absent of law and statute correlatively ; the fifth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside affects the finance and revenue - expenditure auditing of the grass roots and father affects the grass roots to raise fee upon public construction and education, as a result, there ' s more charge that is out of law, the monocracy of grass roots " finance ought to be carry out ; the sixth one, legal measures connect with the reform of toll and tax in countryside in dire need of to be built, which mainly conclude legal system that adjust country social security, country compulsory education and country debt

    第三部分? ?農村稅費改革法律課題集中展示了農村稅費改革所面臨且亟待解決六大法律問題。即:其一,在確定農業稅,計稅依據不科學、稅率偏高、相關法律規范缺失,無法平保護農民合法權益;其二,在農村稅收徵收,缺乏行之有效法律監督和運行機制,尤其是農業特產稅徵收缺乏保障據實徵收法律規范;其三,稅費改革凸顯農民之間、農村之間負擔不,使納稅主體權利義務失衡,有悖稅負法律原則;其四,由於稅收法定主義沒有得到有效貫徹,規制農民負擔反彈方面法律法規缺位,致使農村稅費改革伏著農民負擔反彈風險;其五,稅費改革影響基層組織財政收支,進而影響鄉村公益事業建設及教育經費籌措,引發稅外亂收費沉渣泛起,基層財政體製法治化勢在必行;其六,與稅費改革相關配套法律措施巫待構建,主要是農村社會保障法律體系、鄉村義務教育和鄉村債務疏導法律支撐魚待構建與完善。第四部分一一農村稅費改革與相關法律制度構建基於一部分提出法律問題,圖構築農村稅費改革法律框架並提出相應對策。
  2. The reference area method, the mode method, and the non - effective coefficient of cultivated land and the cultivated land consolidation criterion coefficient for low, middling and high consolidation levels in yanqing county, the mode of village residential land readjustment in yanqing county may all be applied for the other similar counties for estimating the land consolidation potential. and the cultivated land consolidation potential and the villages residential land readjustment potential in yanqing county may be used as basic scientific data in yanqing county for land consolidation planning and feasible study of land consolidation projects

    本文提出樣區法、模式法以及採用述兩種方法測算出延慶縣溝路渠田坎系數、不同耕地整理水平溝路渠田坎系數標準和農村居民點整理模式可作為同類地區在測算土地整理時參考;測算出延慶縣耕地整理和農村居民點整理可作為延慶縣土地整理規劃和土地整理項目可行性研究科學依據。
  3. 16032 evaluation units of the potential land productivity were overlaid out. by using the mechamism methodology and relative computing models, yaan city ' s land productive potentiality was computed according to synthetic index of land productivity evaluation that was taken as soil effective coefficient. result of research indicated that : ( a ) siol effective coefficient changed from 0. 3047 to 0. 8550, respectively with medium - low yield farmland of 71. 28 percent. ( b ) the division of climate productivibilty is situated on the third degree and fourth class western area in east of chian

    4 、雅安市土地自然生產與目前實際生產水平比較,其增產為23 . 53 ,說明農業技術和管理措施增產較大;將目前土地實際生產水平與15年前比較,土地實際生產水平逐年升,年遞增0 . 64 ,顯然,土地自然生產是可以通過各種農技措施來挖掘
分享友人