濫用壟斷權 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [lànyònglǒngduànquán]
濫用壟斷權 英文
abuse of monopoly
  • 濫 : 動詞（泛濫） overflow; flood; inundateⅡ形容詞（差的; 陳腐的） shoddy; hackneyed; stale; trite Ⅲ副...
  • 用 : Ⅰ動詞1 （使用） use; employ; apply 2 （多用於否定: 需要） need 3 （敬辭: 吃; 喝） eat; drink Ⅱ名...
  • 壟 : 名詞1. （耕地上培成的土埂） ridge 2. （田地分界的稍稍高起的小路） raised path between fields3. （像壟的東西） ridge-like things
  • 斷 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分成段） break; snap 2 （斷絕;隔斷） break off; cut off; stop 3 （戒除） give up; abstai...
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 濫用 : abuse; misuse; use indiscriminately
  • 壟斷 : monopolize; forestall; monopoly
  1. The third part gives relevant legislation suggestions and strategies in three aspects in the light of the shortages of demurring patent tort. these suggestions and strategies are : 1 ) constitute law of anti - monopolization imitating countries that have advanced legislation of intellectual property rights to prevent patentee from abusing his rights ; 2 ) smooth the way of administrative law execution of patent and delimit properly the bounds between administrative law execution and judicial review ; 3 ) strengthen imitational communication and academic discussion in demurring patent tort and increase the strength of being in line with the world

    第三大部分是針對目前我國在專利侵權抗辯問題上存在的不足之處提出了三個方面的立法建議及對策，一是效仿知識產權立法先進國家制定一部反壟斷法，防止專利權人對其權利濫用；二是理順專利行政執法途徑，正確界定專利行政執法與司法審查之間的界限；三是加強專利侵權抗辯方面的國際交流與理論探討，加大與國際接軌的力度，充分利用國際條約，最大限度地保護我國的國家利益。
  2. Certain government departments that possess administrative monopolies that limit competition misuse their power, and go beyond the legal limit of their authority to break up or seal off the market

    某些具有限制競爭的行政壟斷權的政府部門濫用他們的權利，甚至超越其權力的法律限度，破壞或封鎖市場。
  3. Under the drive of this kind of benefits, each local government, profession section and several big business enterprises abuse the administrative power, limiting or expelling the fair competition. numerous business enterprises feel it difficult to speak their minds or dare not speak out. thus, the rights of consumers are injured hardly, the development of national economy loses its balance seriously, which of course destroys the establishment and perfection of a unified big market

    壟斷的理由多種多樣，五花八門，但究其動力來說，就是追求直接或間接的經濟利益，在這種利益驅動下，各地方政府、各行業部門以及各個規模龐大的企業集團濫用自己的地位與權力，限制和排除公平競爭，不僅使眾多企業有口難言，更是嚴重侵害了消費者的利益，破壞了社會主義市場經濟的聲譽，造成國家經濟發展的嚴重失衡，損害了統一大市場的建立與完善。
  4. The author suggests that the government should establish as soon as possible the national antitrust law and rules in intellectual property area. thirdly, the author studied the legal system of

    正確認識知識產權領域壟斷問題，其立法依據應是知識產權的市場支配力，規制對象應是知識產權領域中的權利濫用行為
  5. We all know that copyright systems can be well received and observed only when they are rational monopolist systems, they must be restricted to some extent while the copy right owners have been authorized their rights, or the rights will be obused, at the same time, this is disadvantageous to the fast transmission function of the internet, this will also bring incovennience to the public

    我們知道，知識產權制度是一種合法的壟斷制度，但只有在它是符合情理的壟斷制度時，它才能被人們普遍接受並自覺遵守。因此賦予權利人一定權利的同時，也必須加以一定的限制，否則就會導致權利的濫用，同時也不利於網路迅捷的傳輸功能，給社會公眾的使用帶來不便。
  6. From analyzing the semantic meaning of the word " administrative " and " monopoly " and comparing various definitions on the term " administrative monopoly ", this paper defines it as the behavior of the administrative body in controlling competition by abusing executive power

    通過對「行政」及「壟斷」進行語義分析，並在對學界關于「行政壟斷」的幾種定義進行分析比較的基礎上，本文將行政壟斷的涵義界定為：行政壟斷是行政主體濫用行權力限制競爭的行為。
  7. The most common type of misuse occurs when the patent holder uses the patent to violate the antitrust laws

    最常見的濫用專利權常發生在專利權人利用其專利違反反壟斷法的時候。
  8. The most common type of misuse occcurs when the patent holder uses the patent to violate the antitrust laws

    最常見的濫用專利權常發生在專利權人利用其專利違反反壟斷法的時候。
  9. Patent law has formed the mechanism that balances the different interest of the society, such as the patent right ca n ' t be abused etc. in fact, gene sequence patent extend industrial circles " monopoly right to bring them more interest

    就一國內部來講，傳統專利法在調整利益關繫上的實踐中已形成了一種衡平機制，如對基礎理論不能壟斷、獲得的專利壟斷權不能超出其做出的貢獻、不能濫用專利權、對技術的進一步的開發、研究不能壟斷等。
  10. Immediately after, this article analyzed gains or losses of standardize, analyzed the two greatest irregularities because of standardize : standardize monopoly and international trade technical barrier. standardize monopoly comes from the abuse of patent right, because of the close relation between standardize and patent right. through the article listed a lot of examples, introduced the proceeding how enterprise abuse patent right to restrict competition

    接著，分析了標準化的利弊，重點分析了標準化所產生的兩大弊端:標準化壟斷和國際貿易技術壁壘。由於標準化和專利權有著密切聯系，標準化壟斷基本上是由於專利權的濫用所產生的，詳細介紹了企業在標準化戰略中，如何濫用專利權限制競爭。
  11. Intellectual property right is a legitimate monopoly. generally speaking, intellectual property possibly makes the proprietor hold a dominant market position, some proprietor of intellectual property right abuse the dominant market position for benefit. as we know, antimonopoly law " s purpose is to protect competition, so anticompetitive acts will be published by antimonopoly law

    但是，知識產權這種獨占權往往會使權利擁有者在某一特定市場上形成壟斷或支配地位，限制了該市場的競爭，尤其是在某些情況下，知識產權人可能會超出法律允許的正當范圍，濫用其依法獲得的正當權，通過不正當地行使知識產權，非法限制競爭，從而違反了反壟斷法。
  12. Yet intellectual property ' s legal monopolization is a decisive factor of franchisor ' s right in restricting franchisee ' s activities in their contract to some extent. at the same time, franchise also involves three parties of franchisor, franchisee, and other relevant competitors and includes competitive relation in terms of the horizontal and vertical levels. besides, a franchisor tends to use his advantages to abuse his rights, restricting competition against the anti - monopoly law such as tied selling, resale price maintenance and regional restrictions, when he signs a contract with a franchisor

    因為特許經營與壟斷專營有相似之處，在特許經營中，特許人（或稱特許權人）通過特許經營合同將其所擁有的商標、商號、專利或專有技術等使用權授予被特許人，這就涉及到知識產權、產品銷售權、技術技巧等的轉讓，而知識產權本身的合法壟斷性質決定了特許人在特許經營合同中有權對被特許人的活動進行一定的限制；同時，特許經營又涉及特許人、被特許人和其他相關競爭者，包含橫向、縱向兩個層次的競爭關系，特許人與被特許人簽訂特許經營合同時，極有可能利用其優勢地位濫用特許權，做出搭售、維持轉售價格、區域限制等與反壟斷法相抵觸的限制競爭行為。
  13. Administrative monopoly is the act that the government and its subordinate departments or its authorized organizations are abused to use their administrative rights to restrict competition. it composes of body, subject and object and appears in forms of regional monopoly, department monopoly, government restrict trade and administrative corporations and etc. chinese current law and regulations has many loopholes and is not effective and perfect enough to prevent administrative monopoly validly

    行政壟斷是指政府及其所屬部門或其委託授權的組織濫用行政權力限制競爭的行為，它應由主體要件、主觀要件和客觀要件構成，其主要表現形式是地區壟斷、部門壟斷、政府限定交易和設立行政性公司等。
  14. Article36 : administrative power by government and organisations to which lawsand regulations grant rights to administer public issues shall notabuse administrative power to force the undertakings to carry outmonopoly conducts according to this law

    第三十六條行政機關和法律、法規授權的具有管理公共事務職能的組織不得濫用行政權力，強制經營者從事本法規定的壟斷行為。
  15. In view of this situation, we should create our own franchise as soon as possible abuse control system, or as soon as possible to develop their own " anti - monopoly ", or in the revision of the " anti - unfair competition law " course will act as a patent misuse of improper competition into its adjustment range, or designate a separate legal regulations for the conduct of such abuse franchise system

    針對這種情況，我國應盡快地構建自己的專利權濫用控制體系，或者盡快地制定出自己的《反壟斷法》 ，或者在修改《反不正當競爭法》的時候將專利權濫用的行為作為一種不正當競爭行為納入其調整范圍，或者指定出單獨的法律對專利權濫用這種行為進行規制。
  16. Administrative monopoly is a kind of monopoly action in which the administrative subjects abuse or overstep administrative power to exclusively control the economy motion of the market. it results in exclusion, restriction or hindrance to fair market competition

    行政壟斷是指行政主體濫用或超越行政權力，對市場的經濟運行過程進行排他性控制，排斥、限制或妨礙市場正當競爭的行為。
  17. Anti - monopoly regulation against the abuse of intellectual property rights

    知識產權濫用的反壟斷規制
  18. In chapter 4, i research to abuse of a dominant position, which is a topical act of abuse of intellectual property. in this chapter, i first discuss how to define market position and relevant market. then, i examine the legitimate act of intellectual property and abuse of intellectual property

    第四章，研究了反壟斷法所規制的知識產權濫用兩種典型行為，重點探討了濫用市場支配地位的知識產權行為，分析研究了如何界定市場支配地位，如何確定相關市場尤其是產品市場，重點討論了哪些是知識產權的合法行使行為，哪些是知識產權的濫用行為，應受到反壟斷法規制。
  19. Therefore, though a franchisor ' s right of legal monopoly should be protected, legislations and regulations relevant to a franchisor ' s behaviors of restricting competition by means of abusing his right should be made in anti - monopoly law. this is the most complicated issue in franchise

    因此，在特許經營中，一方面應保護特許人因特許權所享有的合法壟斷權：另一方面，也應對特許人濫用特許權做出的限制競爭行為進行反壟斷法律規制，這是特許經營中最復雜的法律問題。
  20. The intellectual property is in essence a legal monopoly that the law entrusts to, but just as any right will be used in an unreasonable way, the legal monopoly of intellectual property will be abused too. especially in the era of knowledge - driven economy

    知識產權在本質上是法律賦予的合法壟斷，但是正如任何權利都有被濫用的可能一樣，知識產權也不例外? ?特別是在知識經濟時代，知識產權已日益成為一些行業權利擴張的手段和工具，成為發達國家處理國際經濟、科技、貿易問題的一種重要策略。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書