皖治 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wǎnzhì]
皖治
英文
kanji-
So ， this dissertation focused on these main ways of traditional chinese philology ， such as the ways of philology ， phonology and exegetics ， and basing on the particularity of medicine documents ， summed up roundly a system of the ways of anhui - school plain - ology about collating and exegetics of suwen ( 素 問 ) from five angles - the way of distinguishing the forms ， the way of discussing the pronunciations ， the way of explaining the meanings ， the way of collation ， the way of explaining the medical principles ， and by comparing it with the exegetic school ， made a farther summarization to the characteristics of the collative school from such ways - the style of study ， the spirit of study and the way of study ， etc
論文從五個角度全面歸納了皖派樸學《素問》校詁的方法體系:辨形方法、考音方法、釋義方法、校勘方法、釋醫理方法。在比較「注釋派」的基礎上，本文從治學風格、治學精神、治學方法諸方面，進一步總結了校詁派的獨到特色。第四，中國學術史上的「漢宋之爭」是形成《素問》校詁派與注釋派的重要學術背景因素。The people who studied neijing ( 內 經 ) historieally can be classified as two sorts ? the exegetes in collation and exegetes in commentaries of medicine books. the former such as duanyucai ( 段 玉 裁 ) 、 hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孫 詒 讓 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ), who belonged to anhui school of the experts in plain - ology ， paid their attentions to textual researeh for contextual contents as their style of study ， and the latter sueh as wangbing ( 王 冰 ) 、 wukun ( 吳 昆 ) 、 zhangjiebin ( 張 介 賓 ) 、 mashi ( 馬 蒔 ) 、 zhangzhicong ( 張 志 聰 ) ， who all were famous physicians ， paid their attentions to the explaining of medical principles as their style of study. a famous professor of the conteeporary era ， qianchaochen ( 錢 超 塵 ) ， pointed out clearly that there are two schools in the exegetical history of neijing ( 內 經 ) - the collative school and the exegetic school. but up to date ， in the field of chinese medicine ， the collative school has been short of being studied. this dissertation mainly study the collative school ， and select suwen ( 素 問 ) collative school ， which is consisted of hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孫 詒 讓 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ), as the object to discuss the far - reaching influence of plain - ology to the study of medical documents
歷史上研究《內經》的群體主要有兩大類:校勘訓詁家類和醫學注釋家類。前者以段玉裁、胡澎、俞樾、孫詒讓、于鬯等皖派樸學家為核心力量，治學風格上偏於文理的考證;後者以王冰、吳昆、張介賓、馬蒔、張志聰等醫學大家為主要代表，治學風格上偏於醫理的解釋。當代著名醫學文獻研究專家錢超塵則明確提出了「校詁派」與「注釋派」兩大派別概念。Then ， in order to open out the difference of the ways of their study between the collative school and the exegetic school ， we have introduced 53 typical cases of textual research ， which separately belong to five parts - distinguishing the forms ， discussing the pronunciations ， explaining the meanings ， collation ， explaining the medical principles ， in the latter part of dissertation ， and introduced every case by the order - [ original text ] [ collation and exegesis of past years ] [ textual research of anhui school ] [ commentary ]
論文下篇則選擇了53例典型的考證釋例，分辨形例、考音例、釋義例、校勘例、釋醫理例五個部分，逐條按原文、歷代校注、皖派考釋、評析進行介紹，以展示「校詁派」與「注釋派」的治學方法的差異。In every part of the country they have their secret societies, which were originally their mutual - aid organizations for political and economic struggle, for instance, the " triad society " in fukien and kwangtung, the " society of brothers " in hunan, hupeh, kweichow and szechuan, the " big sword society " in anhwei, honan and shantung, the " rational life society " in chihli and the three northeastern provinces, and " the green band " in shanghai and elsewhere
他們在各地都有秘密組織，如閩粵的「三合會」 ，湘鄂黔蜀的「哥老會」 ，皖豫魯等省的「大刀會」 ，直隸及東三省的「在理會」 ，上海等處的「青幫」 ，都曾經是他們的政治和經濟斗爭的互助團體。A brief description of tunnel defects on wangan line and its treatment
淺議皖贛線隧道病害及其整治The author of this article thinks it significant to choose to investigate into the rural family aged supporting pattern in southern mountain areas of anhui province as a sample to get detailed revealment of china ' s current aged security in rural communities where people once lived closely around their clan. most southern part of anhui once belonged to huizhou, a historical area with tight clan domination and a strong tradition to support old family members. taking the mountain village zhaitan located in jixi, one southern county of anhui, as a specific research example, the author tries to give a detailed analysis and description of the changing process of the family support pattern accompanied by conflicts and current possible policies to choose in rural communities of similar traditional background
並以具有相同社區文化傳統，同時可耕地少、勞動力轉移程度較高、村民較為富裕的績溪宅坦古村社區為具體剖析個案，在借鑒已有相關研究成果的基礎上，主要運用人類學、現象學社會學的日常生活分析法和政治學的焦點事件分析法，詳細揭示皖南山區農村家庭養老模式的變遷過程及這一過程中的矛盾、沖突以及現階段所面臨的新選擇，並在尊重社區傳統的基礎上，就整合與建構現階段皖南山區宗族聚居農村社區新型家庭養老模式，提出自己的見解和對策。分享友人