確認一個定罪 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [quèrènyīgèdìngzuì]
確認一個定罪
英文
uphold a conviction- 確 : 形容詞1. （符合事實; 真實） true; reliable; authentic 2. （堅固; 堅定） firm
- 認 : 動詞1 （認識; 分辨） recognize; know; make out; identify 2 （建立關系） enter into a certain rela...
- 個 : 個Ⅰ量詞1 （用於沒有專用量詞的名詞） : 一個理想 an ideal; 兩個月 two months; 三個梨 three pears2 ...
- 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （平靜; 穩定） calm; stable 2 （已經確定的; 不改變的） fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
- 罪 : Ⅰ名詞1 （犯法的行為） crime; guilt 2 （過失） fault; misconduct; blame; wrongdoing 3 （苦難; 痛苦...
- 確認 : affirm; confirm; acknowledge; identification; corroboration
- 定罪 : declare sb. guilty; convict sb. （of a crime）
-
According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment ", the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment ", and taking the error making method, compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate, the sentencing, and the distribution of punishment, it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion, even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment, so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances, it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances. in the process of jurist and legislation, we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house ", recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly,
根據「統一配刑論」的原理，筆者提出了「配刑情節」的概念，並採取歸謬法，將「入戶搶劫」同時置於定罪、量刑、配刑三種語境下進行比較，得出「入戶搶劫」既不應該是犯罪情節，也不可能是量刑情節，作為配刑情節也存在理論障礙的結論，進一步推斷出「入戶搶劫」不應該作為法定情節，即使作為法定情節也應該是配刑情節的結論，而且在司法和立法中應從嚴把握「戶」的認定標準，正確認識和配置「入戶搶劫」的法定刑，防止罪刑失衡，還對具體案件和審判實踐中要解決的幾個問題提供了參考方案。Establishing principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, the constitutive elements of a crime stipulated in the criminal law is the sole legal basis of conviction, so we ought to research them in the angle of constitution of crimes. based on our current theories of constitution of crimes, in this thesis, the author detailed studied the series of acts both prescribed in the criminal law and wide - recognizied in the academic circles, and proved that in which element they did not accord with the constitution of a crime
這種研究方法並不科學，尤其是罪刑法定原則確立后，犯罪構成就是定罪的唯一法律根據，我們也應該從犯罪構成的角度來審視它們。本文立足於我國的犯罪構成理論，對刑法明文規定的以及理論上廣為承認的一系列不構成犯罪的行為進行了較為詳細的分析，從犯罪構成的角度論證了它們分別是在哪一個要件上阻卻成立犯罪的。Finally, fix the fact error limit, think that such ought to consist of three kinds of forms : target error, strike error and the causation error. be living on this base, get off a definition to the fact error, namely, fact error in the criminal law is that action man is living to implement in the process willfully committed a crime, constitute to committing a crime that the fact that does not need the statue rating happens correctly not understanding in the important document, the criminal fact that the criminal fact that action man who arouses anticipates against practice happens not unanimously
最後，確定了事實認識錯誤的范圍，認為其應包括三種類型：對象錯誤、打擊錯誤和因果關系錯誤。在此基礎上，給事實認識錯誤下了一個定義，即刑法中的事實認識錯誤是指行為人在實施故意犯罪過程中，對犯罪構成要件中不需要法律評價的事實發生不正確認識，引起的行為人預想的犯罪事實與實際發生的犯罪事實之間的不一致。第三部分:事實認識錯誤的處理原則。
分享友人