經前期違和 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [jīngqiánwéi]
經前期違和 英文
premenstrual molimen
  • : 經動詞[紡織] (把紡好的紗或線梳整成經紗或經線) warp
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (在正面的) front 2 (次序在先的) first; top 3 (過去的; 較早的) ago; before; preceding...
  • : 期名詞[書面語]1. (一周年) a full year; anniversary 2. (一整月) a full month
  • : 動詞1. (不遵照; 不依從) disobey; defy; violate 2. (離別) part; leave; be separated
  • : 和動詞(在粉狀物中加液體攪拌或揉弄使有黏性) mix (powder) with water, etc. : 和點兒灰泥 prepare some plaster
  • 違和 : molimen; acosmia
  1. The commodities traded there include 6. 5mm steel bars, natural silk, chemical fibres, small red beans and plywood. with its 140 satellite ground receiving stations, 80 wired display screens, complete rules and regulations for futures trade, suzhou commodities futures exchange is now among the nation s best commodities exchange in whatever way

    5毫米建築鋼材,后推出繭絲、化纖,目又增加膠合板、紅小豆等。過幾年的積極探索,蘇州商品交易所建立並逐步完善了貨交易章程交易規則、會員管理、結算細則、交割及約處理調解仲裁辦法等規章規則,規范化管理達到了國內先進水平。
  2. In the transformation of the market economy, some behaviors in our country ' s enterprise had already broken the laws. an important reason is the lack of the internal control system. meanwhile, with the entry of the wto and the world integrated economic, our enterprises are faced huge pressure of competition

    在市場濟建設初,我國企業出現了不少法亂紀的行為,一個重要的原因就是缺乏有效的內部控制,同時,隨著濟全球一體化我國已加入wto ,企業面臨著巨大的競爭壓力,使得加強完善企業內部控制已成為當濟工作中的一項重要任務。
  3. The regulation methods may be divided into prudential regulation and opportunist behavioral regulation, the former regulates the financial risk and normal management ability of futures brokerage firms, including regulation of market access, on - going operation and market withdraw, the latter regulates the violation of rules and regulations, the opportunist behaviors that do harm to the public but benefit themselves

    中國貨公司監管的主體是中國證監會;監管的類型分為審慎性監管機會主義監管,者對貨公司的財務風險正常的營能力進行監管,包括市場準入、持續市場退出的監管,後者是對貨公司法、損人利己的機會主義行為的監管。
  4. The study analyze the reason for brain drain in high - tech enterprise, and draw the conclusion that lacking the long - term incentive in wage system is the main cause for loss of human resource, so i raise the viewpoint of bringing in the stock options from foreign high - tech corp. after making a comparative analysis between china and america, and drawing on the experience of foreign counties in this regard. i make a suggestion in stock source, the option striking price in china, which are not contradictory with the existing laws and regulations in our country

    本文在對高新技術企業人力資源的流失原因進行分析的基礎上,得出目國內薪酬設計中長激勵不足是產生高科技企業人員流動的主要原因,從而確定了引入股票權激勵機制的提條件,其後,在對我國股權運作模式及股票權激勵機制制約因素的分析基礎上,借鑒國外幾十年來實施股票權的相對較為成熟的驗,提出了對我國相關法律法規的一些政策性建議,同時,針對我國法律及公司治理等方面對股票運作的障礙,提出了與現行法律不相背的股票來源、股票行權價等方面的設計,並建設性地針對高科技企業提出了團隊股票權激勵計劃及針對高科技企業的股票權運作方法,從而為相關部門制訂有關政策及法律法規提供了借鑒,也為高科技企業實施股票權提供了一套基本的原則方法。
  5. Because our legal system belong to the common law, but anticipatory breach is the characteristic of english - american law, can anticipatory breach solve the problems in common law ? when the anticipatory breach is introduced, are there conflicts in the institution ? how to improve the anticipatory breach with these projblems with some faults and shortcomings ? this paper inquires these things in three parts. starting bread with the two outside forms of the auticipatory and the two outside forms of the auticipatory non - permermance, the first part of the passage inquires the value and the orcial base of the anticipatory breach by surveyingjit ' s origination and changing process under the origination and changing process under the special historical background. by comparing the anticipatory breach with counterargument right for security, the second part states a viewpoint that the former is superior is superior to the latter in protection parties " lawful rights though there are many similarities and differences between them. from this, we can come to a comclusion that the counterargument right for security is no substition for conticipetory breach and that the former should be part of the latter. the third party gives a detailed explanation of anticipatory breach in english ? american law systems in chinese system of anticipatory breach. finally, the anther makes some important suggestion : first, the subject of counterargument right for security should be attend to either party of the contract

    其價值在於使受害方能提獲得法律上的救濟,防止其蒙受本來可以避免的損失。第二部分筆者通過對預約與不安抗辯權的比較研究,對我國《合同法》應如何處理、協調來自不同法系的這兩項並不完全相同的法律制度的關系提出了自己的觀點。筆者認為不安抗辯權是通過對合同利益待權的保護,實現法律「公平」「安全」的價值,而預約除標示上述價值目標外,更是法律對「效率約」這一濟理論的認可,顯示了法律對「效益」這一價值目標的追求,從而提出預約與不安杭辮權二者制度功能相似而制度構造不同,預約制度較之不安杭辮權更有利於保護當事人的合法權益,由此得出我國《合同法》中不安抗辮權不僅不能替代預約,而是預約應該吸納不安抗辮權的結論
分享友人