親屬為基礎的 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qīnzhǔwéichǔde]
親屬為基礎的 英文
kinship-based
  • : 屬名詞1 (類別) category 2 [生物學] (生物分類系統上所用的等級之一) genus 3 (家屬; 親屬) fami...
  • : 名詞(墊在房屋柱子底下的石頭) plinth
  • : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 親屬 : kinsfolk; relatives; clan親屬關系 kinship; family ties; 親屬語言 related language; 親屬語言學 genetic languages
  1. This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life, damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead, which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first, under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death, the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death, in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second, under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health, the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation, which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third, since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits, is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation

    本文重點探討就是公民生命權受到侵害、健康權受到侵害、 「死者人格」受到侵害這三種情形下受害人近精神損害賠償請求權問題。探討以介紹和比較國外相關法律規定和學術理論前提,結合我國實際情況,從理論與實踐相結合角度對以上各問題分別進行了分析,並提出了作者自己一些見解:第一、在公民從受傷害到死亡有一段時間距離情形下,死者除依法享有其固有精神損害賠償請求權以外,還可以繼承死者生前就其所受之精神損害而享有精神損害賠償請求權;第二、在加害人已造成直接受害人殘疾,或者是造成其健康嚴重受損其他後果情形下,我國應在借鑒國外已有立法和判例上,賦予一定范圍內受害人近以精神損害賠償請求權;第三、法律保護死者人格不受侵害了保護死者近利益和維護公共利益,一般情形下,只要死者近能證明其訴訟主體合法性,能夠證實侵害「死者人格」已構成侵權,即可推定死者近因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?無須舉證「名義上精神損害」 ,死者近即可提起精神損害賠償之訴。最後,本文認,加強對受害人近權利和利益保護問題研究,既有一定必要性,同時又具有十分重要現實意義。
  2. Brassica crops occupy the largest cultivated areas and produce the highest yields among the vegetables and oil crops in our countryside. it is one of the most prevalent crops in the utilization of heterosis and have been regarded as model plants in the process of researches on their molecular mechanism of self - incompatibility and breeding and application of male sterility

    蕓薹植物( brassica )是我國栽培面積最大,產量最高一類蔬菜與油料作物,在我國蔬菜和油料生產和供應中佔有極其重要地位,蕓薹作物也是雜種優勢利用最普遍一類作物,其自交不和性分子機理和雄性不育系選育及其應用研究深受人們重視。
  3. If a son grows up and builds his family, he would depart from his parents. who provides services for parents, who inherits the properly. manchu people solve the puberty problem through the form of marriages ; manchu government help the people establish the families, declaring the free principle in marriage

    女真-滿族歷史上最有影響組織,是金代猛安謀克、清代八旗組織,對女真-滿族人和心理意識打上了深深烙印,成滿族締結社會團體重要文化心理
  4. Thermocycled pcr samples were resolved electrophoretically on 1. 5 % agarose gels and taken photos using a polaroid camera. the statistical results were analyzed by the spss software, and the cluster figures were obtained. conclusions could be drawn from the study as following : 1 ) the molecular systematics of 57 species of crickets, which belong to 26 genera 7 family in grylloidea, had been studied by the approach of rapd

    本項研究在依據外部形態分類鑒定及前人工作上,採用rapd技術,通過對蟋蟀總科7科2657種蟋蟀因組dnarapd圖譜比較研究,在分子水平上探討這些類群分類地位和緣關系,豐富蟋蟀總科分子系統學研究,並進一步完善蟋蟀總科分類系統,揭示其系統發育及演化提供分子水平依據。
  5. The article does n ' t inprove the point of view that the absense of factual identity can be maked up by other person ' s actions. however, the article firmly belives that, at the case of crime with identity, the person no identity, no matter factual identity or legal identity, can not be perpetrator, not be indirect perpetrator by making use of actions of the persson with identity either

    學界多認自然身份缺陷可經由他人而彌補,對此,筆者進行了批駁,並在考察強奸罪、墮胎罪、殺害尊罪、傳播性病罪等個罪上提出,只要是身份犯,無論是自然身份或法定身份,無身份者既不能構成直接正犯,亦不能經由有身份者參與而成立間接正犯。
分享友人