訟訴時效 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sòngsùshíxiào]
訟訴時效 英文
limitation of actions
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 時 : shí］Ⅰ名1 （比較長的一段時間）time; times; days:當時at that time; in those days; 古時 ancient tim...
  • 效 : Ⅰ名詞（效果; 功用） effect; efficiency; result Ⅱ動詞1 （仿效） imitate; follow the example of 2 ...
  • 時效 : 1 （在一定時間內能起的作用）effectiveness for a given period of time2 [法律] prescription3 [冶金...
  1. It consists of eight parts : from part one to part six the following are analysis and studies such as the definition and scope of products both at home and abroad, the definition and norms of judgement of the product defects, the imputation principle of pl, the subject of pl, the pl cause of counterplea, the compensation for damages of pl. etc. in part seven is a brief comparison between responsibility of quote and lawsuit limitation. and a conclusion is drawn from the above seven parts which will gives us some ideas about what we should learn and what will make it perfect for our pl

    第一部分至第六部分依次就中外產品責任法中產品的定義和范圍、產品缺陷的定義和判斷標準、產品責任的歸責原則、產品責任主體、產品責任的抗辯事由、產品責任的損害賠償進行了比較研究並就以上各方面我國產品責任立法必須完善之處分別在各部分進行了闡述；第七部分就產品責任訴訟中的舉證責任和訴訟時效進行了簡略的比較；結語部分就上述七部分我國產品責任法的可供借鑒之處和完善進行了結論性的綜述。
  2. A new limitation shall be counted from the time of the discontinuance

    從中斷時起，訴訟時效期間重新計算。
  3. A study on praescriptio extinctive of patent infringement

    專利侵權訴訟時效研究
  4. As a special kind of tort liability, the special assuming ways, excuses of exemption and extinctive prescription of the vicarious liability of employers are also analyzed in this discourse

    作為一種特殊侵權責任，僱主轉承責任有其特殊的承擔方式、免責事由和訴訟時效，本文也對其進行了分析。
  5. In our future real right law, there should be some limitations to the open objects, hut nor the open contents in the property register of immovables ; lawsuit time limit should not he applied to return protoplast right of applicant ; we had better constitute positive prescription system ; powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right, but the transferee is well - meaning ; there should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing ; we should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open ; there should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling tern ; of primary creditor ' s rights is over, except that mortgager is not the debtor ; when the debtor do not refund the debt, the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly, but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty

    摘要我國未來物權法，對于不動產登記簿的開放對象應當有所限制，但對于開放內容不應有所限制；物權人的返還原物請求權不應當適用訴訟時效；應當建立取得時效制度，並應區分一般動產、準不動產、未登記不動產而規定不同的成立條件；在動產的轉讓人為無權處分而受讓人為善意的情況下，轉讓人與受讓人之間的合同是否有效不應當以「無權處分」為條件，只有在轉讓合同無效的情形下，受讓人取得標的物的所有權才是依善意取得制度的取得，此時的取得是原始取得；在共同共有的情形下，原則上處分共有物應當經共有人全體一致同意，但應容有若干例外；不應當規定居住權；動產抵押的公示方式問題無法徹底解決，如果規定動產抵押，應當實行登記要件主義，適于烙印、打刻或貼標簽的動產，應當採取烙印、打刻或貼標簽的方式，其他無法解決公示方式的動產應當禁止抵押；主債權履行期屆滿后，抵押權人行使抵押權，原則上不應當有一個時間限制，但抵押人非為債務人時可容有例外；在債務人不償債時，抵押權人不能直接讓抵押人交出抵押物，實現抵押權，但可以持抵押權登記簿副本直接申請法院拍賣抵押物。
  6. The starting - point and duration - change of civil prescription in our country should be particularized and concrete

    對于訴訟時效起算點和期間變動宜進一步具體化和細致化。
  7. After discussing the limitation of actions and the burden of adducing evidence with respect to the contracting fault liability compensation, the article finally gives comments to the contract law of p. r. china regarding its stipulations on the contracting fault liability and analyses the real cases according to the provisions of the contract law of p. r. china for the purpose of improving the level of judiciary in china

    並探討了締約過失損害賠償的訴訟時效與舉證責任：最後評析了我國《合同法》中關于締約過失責任的規定，並對照《合同法》的規定對所舉事例進行了分析，以期對我國司法有所裨益。
  8. The material ones include that claimant do have claim, that the person do be liable for the claim, that ship can be permitted to be arrested, that it is emergent and will be met great loss if not to arrest a ship and that claim can be accepted by court according to statutes of limitation

    實質要件分為中請人具有海事請求，被申請人對海事請求負有責任，被扣押船舶屬于可扣押的范圍，情況緊急，不立即扣船將會遭受難以彌補的損害，申請人的海事請求沒有超出訴訟時效。
  9. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this thesis is divided into three parts. part i, in the overview of the object of extinctive prescreption, the author at first make a comparation between the extinctive prescreption and the limitation of action. then discards the limitation of action and use of uniform terminology the extinctive prescription

    本文除引言和結論外，共分三個部分，在第一部分消滅時效客體概述中首先通過對消滅時效與訴訟時效的對比，摒棄了訴訟時效的術語而統一使用消滅時效。
  10. Starting from the regulations on marine insurance in china ' s laws and international laws, the treatise studies the legal regulations on the right of subrogation of marine insurance both domestically and abroad ; furthermore, the treatise explains the relationships between the right of subrogation and the " letter of subrogation in terms of civil laws, as well as insurable interest, litigants, objects of litigation, and extinctive prescription ; at last, the treatise discusses the application of law concerning the right of subrogation of marine insurance after china ' s entry into wto

    論文從中國法與國際法關于海上保險求償權的規定的比較入手，研討國內關于海上保險代位求償權的法律規定，進而從民法的角度說明代位求償權與「權益轉讓書」的關系，以及訴訟中的保險利益、訴訟當事人、訴訟標的、訴訟時效問題，最後淺談我國加入wto后海上保險代位求償權的法律適用。
  11. This chapter covers the topics as follows : whether hague rules permit the application of arbitration as a method of settlement of disputes ; whether arbitration clause could stipulate a time bar less than one year ; where arbitration clause fails to provide time limitation, whether the one - year time bar in hague rules should apply

    該部分涉及海牙規則是否允許使用仲裁解決爭議；仲裁條款可否規定短於一年的仲裁時效；如果仲裁條款沒有仲裁時效，海牙規則規定的一年訴訟時效過后，當事方可否提起仲裁等。
  12. Moreover, it analyzes the doctrine of liability fixation, and summaries the constitutive requirements of liability for medical damages as the following : medical damage, medical fault, causality between medical fault and damage. the second chapter of the article mainly studies issues exist commonly in actions for medical damages. firstly, it makes clear the subject of the liability for damages and subject of the right to damages, and analyzes several problems concerning the medical expertise

    第二章主要研究醫療損害賠償訴訟中具有普遍性的幾個問題，明確了醫療損害賠償的責任主體和請求權主體，分析了醫療損害賠償訴訟中的鑒定問題，論述了醫療過失的認定標準，提出了醫療過失與損害後果的因果關系的復雜性，肯定了我國在醫療損害賠償訴訟中實行舉證責任倒置的合理性，闡述了醫療損害賠償紛紛案件可以適用《消費者權益保護法》和應當適用1年訴訟時效。
  13. Further more, it stressed that the invalid contract should be strictly limited within the provisions of article 52 in the " prc contract law " ( hereinafter referred to as the " contract law " ), without implied explanation

    在這一理論前提下，確認合同為無效合同不應適用訴訟時效;而在合同被確認為無效后，由此產生的不當得利請求權與損害賠償請求權則應適用訴訟時效。
  14. On conditions causing interruptions of lawsuit prescription

    論訴訟時效中斷事由
  15. The limitation of time on the adpromissiones which is independent will not suspend for the suspension of the limitation of time on main contract

    保證合同訴訟時效具有獨立性，不因主合同訴訟時效中斷而中斷。
  16. Where the creditor neither files a lawsuit against the debtor nor applies for arbitration during the term of suretyship agreed in the contract or provided in the preceding paragraph, the surety shall be relieved of the suretyship liability ; where the creditor has filed a lawsuit or applied for arbitration, the provisions on the interruption of prescription shall apply to the term of suretyship

    在合同約定的保證期間和前款規定的保證期間，債權人未對債務人提起訴訟或者申請仲裁的，保證人免除保證責任；債權人已提起訴訟或者申請仲裁的，保證期間適用訴訟時效中斷的規定。
  17. Information about a lawsuit or an unpaid judgment against you can be reported for seven years or until the statute of limitations runs out, whichever is longer

    關于訴訟判決對未繳或者你可以報七年或之前追訴時效屆滿后，更長為準
  18. Clause 6 in a dispute arising out of a technology contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than one year between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ' s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than one year, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be two years

    第七條技術進出口合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法施行之日超過兩年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過兩年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為四年。
  19. Clause 7 in a dispute arising out of a technology import / export contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than two years between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ' s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than two years, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be four years

    第七條技術進出口合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法施行之日超過兩年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過兩年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為四年。
  20. Clause 6 in a dispute arising out of a technology contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than one year between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ‘ s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than one year, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be two years

    第六條技術合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法實施之日超過一年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過一年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為兩年。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書