費馬定理 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bìmǎdìnglǐ]
費馬定理 英文
fermat theorem
  • 費 : Ⅰ名詞1 （費用） fee; expense; expenditure; dues; charge 2 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ動詞（花費; 耗費） ...
  • 馬 : Ⅰ名詞1 [動物學] （哺乳動物） horse 2 （象棋棋子） horse one of the pieces in chinese chess3 （姓...
  • 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （平靜; 穩定） calm; stable 2 （已經確定的; 不改變的） fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
  • 理 : Ⅰ名詞1 （物質組織的條紋） texture; grain （in wood skin etc ） 2 （道理;事理） reason; logic; tru...
  1. This article is divided into five chapters, the first chapter on the traditional theory of economic growth " troika " dealing with the analysis of the traditional theory of the economic growth theory systems, the so - called " investment, consumption, import and export " to spur economic growth

    本文分為五章，第一章首先就傳統經濟理論對經濟增長的「三架馬車」的分析進行論述。在經濟增長理論體系中，傳統的「三駕馬車」理論具有一定的位置，即所謂的「投資、消費、進出口」拉動經濟增長。
  2. The invent of irrational numbers, calculus, and the found of non - geometry, the prove of fermat theorem. examples like this are uncountable in the history. with the help of it, people will understand better the real process of math creation, which was fixed in our textbook in form of principles, therefore, we can benefit a lot from our ancestors and be very confident of ourselves

    無理量的發現、微積分和非歐幾何的創立，乃至費馬大定理的證明， … … ，這樣的例子在數學史上不勝枚舉，它們可以幫助人們了解數學創造的真實過程，而這種過程在通常的教科書中是以定理到定理的形式被包裝起來的。
  3. Wiles and / or they must first disprove jiang chun - xuan ' s prove of flt

    威爾斯和或他們必須首先否定蔣春暄對費馬大定理的證明！
  4. Wiles and / or they must first disprove jiang chun - xuan ’ s prove of flt published in early 1992

    懷爾斯和或他們必須首先否定蔣春暄1992年初發表的對費馬大定理的證明！
  5. Jiang said he was waiting for other mathematicians to point out the obvious errors in wiles ' proof of flt

    蔣春暄說他一直在等待其它的數學家指出懷爾斯對費馬大定理的證明的明顯漏洞。
  6. Jiang accomplished all of this was far before wiles made his final announcement that he has eventually proved flt in 1995

    蔣春暄實現所有這些遠在威爾斯1995宣布自己最終證明費馬大定理之前。
  7. If any mathematician disagrees with this, then please answer this question : if it is acceptable for wiles to use rh, an unproved hypothesis, to prove flt, then can wiles now also to use flt in reverse to prove the unproved rh

    如果任何數學家對此不同意，那麼請回答這樣一個問題如果能夠接受懷爾斯使用黎曼假設，一個未經證明的假說假設，對費馬大定理進行證明的話，那麼由於同樣理由，懷爾斯現在是否也可以用費馬大定理反過來證明尚未證明的黎曼假設？
  8. The two point ray tracing is based on the snell theory and the fermat " minimum travel time principle ", which advantages is that it can calculate the accurate ray path from the source to the receiver

    兩點射線追蹤主要是通過snell定理和費馬最小時間原理確定激發點和接收點之間精確的射線路徑。其優點是能夠精確得出反射點的位置。
  9. Subsequently, the waves induced forces and their driven effects on currents are studied in detail. in the discussion of the effects of currents on waves, according to the wave radiation theory and the law of wave action conservation, the equivalence of none vorticity condition of the vector of wave number in constant wave field and fermat theory is testified. the dynamic and kinematics effects of background currents on waves are introduced concisely

    在流對浪的作用討論中，依據波動的射線理論和由變分原理導出的波作用量守恆定律，闡明了穩定波場波數矢量的無旋條件與費馬原理的等價性，扼要討論了背景流場影響海浪的運動學效應和動力學效應，首次指出水位（包括天文潮位與風暴潮位）變化對海浪成長與消衰的影響，為流浪潮聯合數值模式的發展提供必要的理論依據。
  10. The present situation is very similar to the situation described in andersen ' s fairy tale “ the emperor ' s new cloths ” : wiles ( like those tailors in the fairy tale ) has used non - existing “ threads ” ( an unproved hypothesis rh ) to weave “ the most magnificent new cloths in the world for the emperor ” ( wiles ' s proof of flt ), and misleads the ministers of the emperor to believe that only fools can not see and appreciate how magnificent are these new cloths for the emperor

    目前的情況非常像安徒生的童話「皇帝的新衣」中的情景懷爾斯像童話中的裁縫一樣採用「虛假的線」未經證實的「黎曼假設」 「為皇帝編織出世界上最為華麗的新衣」懷爾斯200多頁對費馬大定理的「證明」 ，並且誤導皇帝及其大臣們相信只有傻子才看不見和不能欣賞「皇帝的新衣」多麼華麗！
  11. In early 1992 and again in 1993, jiang mailed over 600 copies of preprints of jiang ' s proof of flt to numerous mathematicians in china and the world, including the princeton university where wiles worked

    蔣春暄於1992年初並再次於1993年將600多份蔣春暄對于費馬大定理的證明的預印本郵寄發給中國與世界無數數學家，包括懷爾斯工作的普林斯敦大學。
  12. In early 1992, and again in 1993, jiang mailed over 600 copies of preprints of jiang ' s proof of flt to numerous mathematicians in china and the world, including the princeton university where wiles worked

    蔣春暄於1992年初並再次於1993年將600多份蔣春暄對于費馬大定理的證明的預印本郵寄發給中國與世界無數數學家，包括威爾斯工作的普林斯敦大學。
  13. Note : in early 1992, and again in 1993, jiang mailed over 600 copies of preprints of jiang ' s proof of flt to numerous mathematicians in china and the world, including the princeton university where wiles worked

    注蔣春暄於1992年初並再次於1993年將600多份蔣春暄對于費馬大定理的證明的預印本郵寄發給中國與世界無數數學家，包括懷爾斯工作的普林斯敦大學。
  14. Therefore, if wiles, and / or other mathematicians abroad or in china supporting wiles, claim that wiles was the first in the world to prove flt, then, wiles, or they, must first disprove jiang chun - xuan ’ s above mentioned prove of flt published in early 1992

    因而，如果懷爾斯，和或支持懷爾斯的任何其它國外或中國的數學家，聲稱懷爾斯為世界上第一個證明費馬大定理的人，那麼，懷爾斯，或者他們，必須首先否定1992年初已經發表的蔣春暄對于費馬大定理的證明。
  15. Failing to disprove jiang chun - xuan ’ s prove of flt published in early 1992 and mailed to wiles and over six hundred mathematicians and institutions in china and worldwide, then wiles, and / or all other mathematicians abroad or in china supporting wiles, are not qualified to claim or agree that wiles was the first in the world to prove flt and are on this issue not only cheating the world

    如若未能否定蔣春暄1992年初就已經發表並寄給世界各地600多位數學家與機構的蔣春暄對于費馬大定理的證明，則懷爾斯，和或世界各地與中國支持懷爾斯的所有數學家，沒有資格聲稱或贊同懷爾斯為世界上第一個證明費馬大定理的人，且在該問題上不僅欺騙全世界
  16. In 1963 a schoolboy called andrew wiles reading in his school library came across the world ' s greatest mathematical problem : fermat ' s last theorem （ 定理 ）

    1963年，一個名叫安德魯?威爾斯的學生在校圖書館里閱讀時遇到了世界上最偉大的數學問題：費馬大定理。
  17. If this is true, which most mathematicians can easily judge, then i can also judge that wiles ' proof of flt is false

    如果這是事實，這是大部分數學家很容易可以判斷的情況，我則也可以判斷懷爾斯對于費馬大定理flt的證明是錯誤的。
  18. During the discussions, a few overseas mathematical researchers asked jiang chun - xuan, if this is the case, can you write another convincing “ disprove wiles ' proof of fermat ' s last theorem ”

    討論中，國外幾位數學研究者問蔣春暄，既然這樣，你能否再寫一篇非常有說服力的《懷爾斯對費馬大定理的證明之否定》 ？
  19. However, after jiang chun - xuan rather carefully studied wiles proof of flt, jiang discovered that wiles ' s proof of flt actually contains rather serious and obvious errors, and is not a valid proof

    蔣春暄比較仔細地研究了懷爾斯對于費馬大定理的證明后，才發現懷爾斯對費馬大定理非常長的證明實際上仍然有嚴重的明顯的漏洞，不是一個有效的證明。
  20. The simimlar form of fermat ' s last theory

    費馬大定理的類似形式
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書