追加訴訟 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhuījiāsòng]
追加訴訟 英文
addition of actions
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (追趕) chase after; run after; pursue; catch up with 2 (追究) trace; look into; get to...
  • : 動詞1. (說給人) tell; relate; inform 2. (傾吐) complain; accuse 3. (控告) appeal to; resort to
  • : 動詞1. (打官司) bring a case to court 2. (爭辯是非) dispute; argue
  • 追加 : add to (the original amount)
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  1. At the same time, as the legislation on this procedural system is too simple, and without any contents, ways and time limit of judicial review, especially without any right of defense of the accused during the proceedings for revision, which leads to the procedure similar to the administrative examination and approval system and without any lawsuit color, so as to interfere with the pursuit of the procedure to the value of justice during the

    同時,由於立法在該程序制度規定上過于簡單,對復核內容、方法、期限均未做出規定,尤其是未規定被告人在復核程序中的辯護權,從而使這一程序近似行政審批制度而鮮有色彩,更影響了該程序在死刑案件裁判中對公正價值的求。當前,死刑復核程序中許多制度性變革被提上議事日程,人們開始重新思考這一程序的性質和存在價值等問題。
  2. The former features in the initiative of exercising the right to prosecute, the higher speed of prosecutors holding case facts and evidence in addition to the higher efficiency of litigious proceedings, but it is likely to bring about clashes between investigative and prosecutorial organs, in turn, weaken the function of prosecution as a whole

    偵檢結合較為密切的模式,更能充分體現國家行使權的主動性,有助於檢察官更迅速地把握案件的事實和證據,使進程更快捷和高效。其缺陷在於容易產生較多的磨擦,反過來削弱整體的功能;偵檢結合較為鬆懈的模式,偵查機關往往能集中精力,排除外在的影響,迅速偵破案件。
  3. Some disadvantages existing in out present pretrial procedure : the differences between pretrial institutions, no regular chairmans, unclearness of the rights and obligations of the leading bodies, softness of pleading function, lackness of practical contents and specific operational procedure, the client ' s no choice of ways of collecting evidences, no pretrial reconciliation procedure, lackness of the function of solving dispute independently, no definite duty of explanation and instruction of judges before trial

    審前準備程序由答程序、爭點證據整理程序、審前會議三部分組成,內容包括程序性送達、告知權利義務、周全部提出主張、證據,實體繁簡分流。變更、當事人、指導舉證、進行證據交換、整理爭點、修改狀和答辯狀、變更固定請求、製作審前準備筆錄、進行調解、和解、排期開庭等。
  4. The countermeasures in the demand are developing institute investors and cultivating financial analysts ; the countermeasures in the supply are perfecting the independent director institution, establishing the shareholder collective suit institution and enforcing the construction of accounting professional ethics

    具體說來,在需求方面,重點是積極發展機構投資者和財務分析師,建立完善會計信息服務體系;供給上,主要是完善獨立董事制度,建立民事責任究制度和股東集體制度,強會計職業道德建設。
  5. After that, the thesis discusses the main shortages of chinese current system of civil litigation expenses in seven aspects. part four : the suggestion of improving chinese system of civil litigation expenses. based on the studies ahead, the thesis provides that the directorial ideology - protecting the right of sue - should be found, and that the power of legislating rules of civil litigation expenses should be hold by the peoples " congress

    最高人民法院制定民事費用規則不僅缺乏法律明文授權,又難以擺脫逐自身利益的動機,影響到民事費用規則的中立性; 2 、費用范圍過窄,當事人為進行自行支出的必要費用及律師費用都因不能納入費用范圍而無法在當事人間分擔,使得權利人通過司法渠道實現權利的成本增,妨礙了當事人行使其權,也使真正權利人的權利價值縮水。
  6. In company with the modernization of economy and society, the amount of crimes is arising amazingly while the judiciary resource ca n ' t increase correspondingly. so it is impossible for the wide application of formed judicial procedure, and the action efficiency becomes the unavoidable practical problem. only the diversion system can make the criminal judicial organization remain the basic ability to treat the crimes and avoid the phenomenon that the state has no capacity to prosecute all crimes, only standing by toward all kinds of crimes and simplifying the formal judicial procedure

    與經濟和社會的現代化相伴生,許多國家的犯罪勢頭都在迅猛增長,而國家的司法資源卻往往不能得到同樣的增,因此正式司法程序的普遍適用已經不再可能,效率問題成為人們無法迴避的現實問題,只有採取分流制度,才有可能使國家刑事司法系統保持對犯罪的基本應對能力,避免出現國家無力全面犯罪、從而對眾多犯罪坐視不管、以及將正式司法程序也高度簡略化、粗糙化的現象。
分享友人