長期預付款 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhǎngqīyùfùkuǎn]
長期預付款 英文
long term prepayments
  • 長 : 長Ⅰ形容詞1 （年紀較大） older; elder; senior 2 （排行最大） eldest; oldest Ⅱ名詞（領導人） chief;...
  • 期 : 期名詞[書面語]1. （一周年） a full year; anniversary 2. （一整月） a full month
  • 預 : Ⅰ副詞（預先; 事先） in advance; beforehand Ⅱ動詞（參與） take part in
  • 款 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （誠懇） sincere 2 [書面語] （緩; 慢） leisurely; slow Ⅱ動詞1 （招待; 款待） receive wit...
  • 長期 : over a long period of time; long-term; long range; secular
  1. The defendant, admart ezone limited, employed and paid salary to the employee during the period from may 16, 2000 to september 30, 2000. however, the defendant failed, without reasonable excuse, to give an advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s cessation of employment as required under section 52 ( 5 ) of the inland revenue ordinance ( iro )

    被告admartezoneltd .在二年五月十六日至二年九月三十日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，並在無合理辯解情況下未有遵照《稅務條例》第52條第（ 5 ）款的規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員停止受雇一事通知稅務局局長。
  2. The defendant, admart ezone limited, employed and paid salary to the employee during the period from may 16, 2000 to september 30, 2000. however, the defendant failed, without reasonable excuse, to give an advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s cessation of employment as required under section 52 of the inland revenue ordinance

    被告a d m a r t e z o n e l t d .在二年五月十六日至二年九月三十日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，並在無合理辯解情況下未有遵照稅務條例第52條第5款的規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員停止受雇一事通知稅務局局長。
  3. Pleaded guilty to the above two charges in the western magistrates courts and was fined 5, 000 for each offence, making a total fine of 10, 000. the defendant employed and paid salary to the employee from march 2000 to december 31, 2001. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s departure from hong kong as required under section 52 of the inland revenue ordinance

    被告gfi hk securities l . l . c .在二年三月至二一年十二月三十一日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，但卻未有遵照稅務條例第52條第6款規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員離開香港一事通知稅務局局長及沒有按照第52條第7款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付任何金錢予該雇員。
  4. Pleaded guilty to the above two charges in the western magistrates courts and was fined $ 5, 000 for each offence, making a total fine of $ 10, 000. the defendant employed and paid salary to the employee from march 2000 to december 31, 2001. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s departure from hong kong as required under section 52 ( 6 ) of the inland revenue ordinance ( iro )

    在二年三月至二一年十二月三十一日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，但卻未有遵照《稅務條例》第52條第（ 6 ）款規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員離開香港一事通知稅務局局長；及沒有按照第52條第（ 7 ）款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付任何金錢予該雇員。
  5. The defendant, talent giant investment limited, pleaded guilty to the two charges in the western magistrate s court and was fined 9, 000 for each offence, making a total fine of 18, 000. the defendant employed and paid salary to the employee during the period from october 21, 1999 to january 4, 2001. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice to the cir regarding the employee s cessation of employment and departure from hong kong as required under section 52 of the inland revenue ordinance

    被告鴻鉅投資有限公司在一九九九年十月二十一日至二一年一月四日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，但卻未有遵照稅務條例第52條6款規定，預先將該雇員停止受雇和離開香港一事通知稅務局局長，亦沒有按照第52條7款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付金錢予該雇員。
  6. The defendant employed and paid salary to the two employees from april 2000 to december 31, 2002. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employees departure from hong kong as required under section 52 ( 6 ) of the inland revenue ordinance ( iro ). also, the defendant failed to withhold payment of money to the two employees, as required under section 52 ( 7 ) of the iro

    被告howerobinsonandcompanylimited在二年四月至二二年十二月三十一日期間僱用及支付薪金予兩名雇員，但卻未有遵照《稅務條例》第52條第（ 6 ）款規定，預先於一個月前將該兩名雇員離開香港一事通知稅務局局長;及沒有按照第52條第（ 7 ）款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付任何金錢予該兩名雇員。
  7. The defendant employed and paid salary to the two employees from april 2000 to december 31, 2002. however, the defendant failed to give advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employees departure from hong kong as required under section 52 of the inland revenue ordinance. also, the defendant failed to withhold payment of money to the two employees, as required under section 52 of the iro

    被告howe robinsonand company limited在二年四月至二二年十二月三十一日期間僱用及支付薪金予兩名雇員，但卻未有遵照稅務條例第52條第6款規定，預先於一個月前將該兩名雇員離開香港一事通知稅務局局長;及沒有按照第52條第7款的規定於發出通知日起計一個月內不得支付任何金錢予該兩名雇員。
  8. The defendant, leo burnett limited, employed and paid salary to the employee during the period from november 22, 1999 to may 19, 2000. however, the defendant failed, without reasonable excuse, to give an advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s cessation of employment as required under section 52 of the inland revenue ordinance

    被告李奧貝納廣告有限公司，在一九九九年十一月二十二日至二年五月十九日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，並在無合理辯解情況下未有遵照稅務條例第52條第5款的規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員停止受雇一事通知稅務局局長。
  9. The defendant, leo burnett limited, employed and paid salary to the employee during the period from november 22, 1999 to may 19, 2000. however, the defendant failed, without reasonable excuse, to give an advance notice of one month to the cir regarding the employee s cessation of employment as required under section 52 ( 5 ) of the inland revenue ordinance ( iro )

    被告李奧貝納廣告有限公司，在一九九九年十一月二十二日至二年五月十九日期間僱用及支付薪金予一名雇員，並在無合理辯解情況下未有遵照《稅務條例》第52條第（ 5 ）款的規定，預先於一個月前將該雇員停止受雇一事通知稅務局局長。
  10. Hence prepayment was often neglected, even advocated. this trend has affected the expected return of the commercial banks. however, empirical studies on default risk and prepayment risk of residential mortgages in china are relatively few

    因此，長期以來，因提前償付而形成的主動違約風險就常常被銀行忽視，甚至提前還款還受到銀行的鼓勵，這種趨勢已經在某種程度上影響了銀行的預期收益。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書