非限制性貸款 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [fēixiànzhìxìngdàikuǎn]
非限制性貸款 英文
nontied loan
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (錯誤) mistake; wrong; errors 2 (指非洲) short for africa 3 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ動詞1 ...
  • : Ⅰ名詞(指定的范圍; 限度) limit; bounds Ⅱ動詞(指定范圍, 不許超過) set a limit; limit; restrict
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (製造) make; manufacture 2 (擬訂; 規定) draw up; establish 3 (用強力約束; 限定; 管束...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (性格) nature; character; disposition 2 (性能; 性質) property; quality 3 (性別) sex ...
  • : loan
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (誠懇) sincere 2 [書面語] (緩; 慢) leisurely; slow Ⅱ動詞1 (招待; 款待) receive wit...
  • 限制性 : restricted; restrictive
  • 限制 : place [impose] restrictions on [to]; astrict; restrict; limit; confine; shut down on [upon]: 限制...
  • 貸款 : 1. (借錢給需要用錢者) provide [grant] a loan; make an advance to; extend credit to2. (貸給的款項) loan; credit
  1. Neither the bank, its associates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees, shall be liable to the customer for any expenses, loss or damage suffered by or occasioned to the customer by reason of any action taken or omitted to be taken by any one or all of the bank, its associates, their directors, officers, employees or agents pursuant to these conditions or in connection therewith other than as a result of the fraud, wilful default or negligence of the bank, its associates, their directors, officers, employees or agents ; the bank s failure in good faith to honour any stop - payment instructions given by the customer ; the presentation to the bank of any cheque or other payment order which is post - dated ; the bank failing to honour any draft drawn on it by the customer, but the bank shall immediately return such draft to the customer through the normal channels giving the reason for the dishonour ; any loss, damage, destruction or misdelivery of or to the securities howsoever caused unless the same shall result from the negligence of, or theft by, the bank or its associates or any of their directors, officers or employees, in which event the extent of the liability of the bank shall be limited to the market value of such securities at the date of discovery of the loss and even if the bank has been advised of the possibility of such loss or damage ; unauthorised use or forging of any authorised signature as a result of the negligence, wilful default or fraud of the customer ; subject to condition 5. 5, any act or omission, or insolvency of, any person not associated with the bank including, without limitation, a third party nominee or depositary ; viii the collection or deposit or crediting to the custodian accounts of invalid, fraudulent or forged securities or any entry in the custodian accounts which may be made in connection therewith ; any malfunction of, or error in the transmission of information caused by, any electrical or mechanical machine or system or any interception of communication facilities, abnormal operating conditions, labour difficulties, acts of god, or any similar or dissimilar causes beyond the reasonable control of the bank and notwithstanding paragraph, the error, failure, negligence, act or omission of any other person, system, institution or payment infrastructure

    本行其聯系人士其各董事高級人員或雇員均毋須向客戶因以下理由而使客戶蒙受或產生之任何開支損失或虧損負責: i本行其聯系人士其董事高級人員雇員或代理人根據此等條件採取或遺漏採取有關之行動,但由於本行其聯系人士其董事高級人員雇員或代理人之欺詐行為故意失責或疏忽所造成者除外ii本行本真誠地未能依約替客戶執行止付指示iii向本行提交任何遠期支票或其他付指示iv本行未能兌現由客戶開出之匯票,但本行將立即透過正常渠道將該匯票退回客戶,並解釋拒付之理由v無論如何導致之任何證券之損失損毀毀壞或錯誤交付除上述各項乃因本行或其聯系人士或其任何董事高級人員或雇員之疏忽或盜竊所引致,而在該等情況下,本行的責任將只於在發現損失當日該等證券之市值,以及即使本行已獲知該等賠償之可能vi因客戶之疏忽故意失責或欺詐行為而導致的任何偽造授權簽名或不獲授權使用該簽名vii在第5 . 5 a條之規下,與本行無關者之任何行動或遺漏或無償債能力包括但不於第三者代名人或寄存處viii代收或存入或存於保管人賬戶的無效偽造或假冒證券或在保管人賬戶記入可能與此有關之賬項ix任何電子機械或系統失靈或因該等機件或系統產生的資料傳送錯誤或任何通訊設施之終斷不正常操作情況勞工問題天災或本行所能合理控之任何類似或類似原因及x盡管有第ix項,任何其他人系統機構或付設施的錯誤故障疏忽行動或遺漏。
  2. Issuing to village the policy subsidying the small sum in interest an agricultural loan a valid path for always is academic circles with poor population in generally accepted the village of solution in government in all levels, promoting village developping, from current see theoretically, the small sum of the certain scope inside subsidying the interest lends money of issue, will promote the agriculture and the development of the village, increase poor and homely income in village level, but the small sum subsidying the loan of interest is can increase the income level of the peasant household, lend money a problem for increasing accepting together native average in circumstance increasing accepting sum comparing, result how, this is this text wanting resolving, this text pass to the inquisition of the loan peasant household, in collecting large quantity one hand material of foundation, is all each county downtown to is investigated the data proceeded to gather, statisticsing the contrast circumstance that loan an income change the circumstance and increase with native average the sum, the loan sum that will be investigated the peasant household, invest the realm proceeded the contrast, and borrow funds with the region not door of that year income increment the sum proceeded the comparison. use the different from lengthways the method research that compare investment in fixed amount realm, different loan sum, not the environmental loan in area in county door increases to accept sum and its correlations. come to explain the public finance subsidy the small sum in interest an agricultural loan an influence for to peasant household income, analyzing the small sum in policy an agricultural loan an influence for to increasing accepting the factor, discussing the policy stick the small sum in interest an agricultural loan a shortage for of policy blemish and managing top, combining domestic and international policy of now of combination an agricultural loan a policy for of policy with managing way, to small sum in policy in our country an agricultural loan style establishment and manage the mode put forward a little bit personal views, the writer thinks that develop the policy an agricultural loan a root for of a farming using is a financial environment of village to push forward financial system in village reform to reform with political setup, improve village finance serve, create a competition, norm, subsidying the interest the loan the solution limitedly not farmer of letter funds need problem

    向農村發放政策貼息小額支農一直是學術界和各級政府比較公認的解決農村貧困人口,促進農村發展的有效途徑,從現有的理論上看,一定范圍內的小額貼息的發放,會促進農業和農村的發展,提高農村貧困家庭的收入水平,而小額貼息是不是能夠提高農戶的收入水平,戶的增收情況同當地的平均增收額比較,效果怎樣,這是本文所要解決的問題,本文通過對農戶的調查,在收集大量第一手材料的基礎上,將各縣市區所有被調查數據進行了匯總,統計出戶收入變化情況以及與當地的平均增長額的對比情況,將被調查農戶的額,投資領域進行了對比,並與當地戶的當年收入增加額進行了比較。用定量比較和縱向比較的方法研究不同投資領域、不同額、不縣域環境的戶增收額及其相互關系。來說明財政貼息小額支農對農戶收入的影響,分析政策小額支農對增收的影響因素,論述政策貼息小額支農的政策缺陷及管理上的不足,並結合當今國內外政策支農的政策和管理方式,對我國政策小額支農的政策定及管理模式提出了個人的一些見解,筆者認為發揮政策支農的支農作用的根本是推進農村金融體改革和政治體改革,改善農村金融服務,創造一個競爭、規范的農村金融環境,有的貼息解決不了農民的信資金需求問題。
分享友人