breach of rule 中文意思是什麼
breach of rule
解釋
違反規則-
The rule of foreseeability is applied to determine the scope of damages for breach, but not applied in nonperformance, such as void contract, voidable contract and negotiation in bad faith during making contract due to one party ' s fault
可預見性原則適用於違約損害賠償，並不適用於非合同履行的場合，例如因一方過錯導致合同無效、合同被撤銷，以及合同訂立過程中的惡意磋商等發生損失的情形。 -
The rule of mitigation doctrine is applied when the following are satisfied. ( 1 ) the damage is resulted from the breach of contract by the party in breach, ( 2 ) the aggrieved party does not take reasonable steps to mitigate the damage, and ( 3 ) thus makes the damage aggravated
減損規則的適用條件有三，一是損害的發生由違約方所致，二是受害方未採取合理措施防止損害擴大，三是損害因受害方未採取合理措施而擴大。 -
The rule of foreseeability is provided in the civil laws or contract laws in many countries, as one of the important tests for limitation on compensation for breach in contract
可預見性原則是限制違約損害賠償的重要標準，已在世界各國的民法或合同法中得到普遍的確立。 -
The methods restricting damages imposed on the party in breach mainly are : the rule of foreseeability, the rule of balancing out increase and decrease, the rule of contributory negligence, and the rule of mitigation of damage
但是，並不是合同相對人事實上蒙受的全部損害都能得到賠償，換言之，違約方的損害賠償是受到限定的。違約方損害賠償的限定規則主要有：可預見性規則、損益相抵規則、過失相抵規則、減損規則。 -
This dissertation, through discussing respectively and researching by comparative method as to the compensation for damages for breach of a contract and for the infringement arising from road traffic accident which is related to serve contract, raises that, there exist mutual part and difference in the scope of damages, the principle of the fixation of liability, the proof of evidence, the rule of the counteraction between faults, the undertaking of the third party for the fault liability, the dealing of the free - rider with good - faith, as to the contract law and tort law in china
筆者在論文中，通過對具有服務合同關系的道路交通事故的違約損害賠償、侵權損害賠償的分別闡述和比較研究，說明了我國合同法和侵權行為法這兩種法律規范在賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任、過失相抵規則適用、第三人過錯責任承擔、好意同乘者的處理等方面，既有相同之處，也存在諸多差異。 -
The rule of balancing out increase and decrease, being available in both abstract and concrete damages for breach of contract, is applied when the following are satisfied, ( 1 ) there stands a debt of damage for breach of contract, ( 2 ) the aggrieved party gains some profits, and ( 3 ) there is cause and effect relationship between breach of contract and the profits
損益相抵規則、過失相抵規則、減損規則，是違約方損害賠償的重要的限定規則，對這三種限定規則，這一部分主要論述了其內涵、適用條件。損益相抵規則的適用條件有三，一是違約損害賠償之債已經成立，二是受害方受有利益，三是違約行為和利益之間具有因果關系；損益相抵專屬于損害賠償問題，在抽象損害賠償和具體損害賠償中都有其適用。 -
In the past, a player was allowed to move loose impediments from his line of putt only with his hand or club. this restriction will be removed in 2004, so that the use of a towel or a cap will no longer be a breach of rule
過往球員準許在推球線上用手或球桿移動散置障礙物，這個限制在新一年的球例中會被刪除，因此球員可用毛巾或帽子移動散置障礙物亦不會受到處罰。 -
If the player removes the cart and does not play a stroke while standing on it, does he nevertheless incur a penalty for a breach of rule 13 - 3
如果這名球員移動了球車，但只是站在上面，還沒有打出一桿，他仍然還會因為違反規則13 - 3而被罰一桿嗎？ -
But in the theory field, the systematical and deeply research is not given, so the application of the rule of foreseeability appears the hazy and confused in the judicial practice. according to many questions about the rule in theory, the thesis expounds the theoretical development and legal values of this rule at first. then the thesis discusses about the theoretical composition of the rule, and holds the delinquent party should foresee that the range of compensation of damages is the damages caused by his breaking contract when he negotiates a contract. finally separately discusses on the relationship between the rule of foreseeability and the principle of complete compensation, between the rule and the doctrine of liability fixation for breach of contract, between the rule and the theory of causal relationship
然而，理論界對可預見性規則尚缺乏系統、深入的研究，導致在司法實踐中對該制度運用時的迷茫和混亂。針對可預見性規則的諸多理論問題，本文首先對可預見性的理論發展、法理價值進行了闡述;其後就可預見性規則的理論構成進行了探討，認為違約一方在合同締結之時預見或應當預見到的因違約造成的損害為其損害賠償的范圍;最後對可預見性規則與完全賠償原則、違約歸責原則和因果關系理論的關系作了探討，認為可預見性規則存在的積極意義在於合理限制違約損害賠償范圍。 -
The rule of foreseeability is the basic among these methods, and, should be supplemented and corrected by the use of the theory of the protection purpose of the norm, being abstract and uncertain standards. according to the rule of foreseeability, it is the party in breach who should foresee, it is when the contract is made that he should foresee, and he should foresee as a common person may do. the contents and applicability of the other three methods of damages restriction are also discussed in this part
可預見性規則是違約方損害賠償的基本的限定規則，依該規則，可預見性的判斷標準為一抽象的不確定標準即社會一般人的預見能力，從而可預見性規則不是十分嚴密，應以規范保護目的說予以補充和修正；可預見性規則中，預見的主體為違約方，預見的時間為合同締結時，對可預見性的判斷以社會一般人的預見能力為標準。 -
“ ashley cole was found to be in breach of rule k5 which states that a contract player, either by himself or by any other party acting on his behalf, shall not either directly or indirectly make any approach to a club with a view to negotiating a contract without obtaining the prior written consent of the club to which he is under contract
"我們發現阿什利-科爾違反了k5條例，該條例聲明有合約在身的球員，無論是本人出面還是以另一方為代表，在未獲得自己俱樂部先期書面同意的情況下，都不應該直接或者間接與其他任何俱樂部就轉會進行接洽。 -
“ jos mourinho ( the manager of chelsea fc ) was found to be in breach of rule q governing managers ' conduct
"何塞-穆里尼奧（切爾西俱樂部主教練）違反了約束教練行為的q條例。 -
The rule for putting responsibility on the violated is one in which fault is not considered ; the remedies for anticipatory breach are as follows : i ) suspending performance of the obligation ; ii ) declaring the contract avoided ; iii ) damages and so on
預期違約適用的歸責原則是無過錯責任原則。預期違約的責任方式有： 1 、中止履行； 2 、在履行期限屆至前解除合同； 3 、要求損害賠償等。 -
Washington ' s partner rule : one person pays no attention ; two don ' t recognize breach of duties ; three will never ever agree with the contract
華盛頓合作規律：一個人敷衍了事；兩個人互相推諉；三個人則永無成事之日。 -
In both cases, the player must discontinue the breach of rule as soon as he becomes aware of it
當球手被知會后，以上兩類違規事情必須立刻停止。持續違規者將被取消比賽資格。 -
Decision 8 - 1 / 10 states that it is not a breach of rule 8 - 1 for a to look into bs golf bag to determine which club b used for his last stroke
《高爾夫球規則》是由蘇格蘭聖安德魯斯皇家古老高爾夫球俱樂部及美國高爾夫球協會審定，世界通用的最權威職業和業余選手之行為規范用書。 -
Q : decision 8 - 1 / 10 states that it is not a breach of rule 8 - 1 for a to look into bs golf bag to determine which club b used for his last stroke
《高爾夫球規則》是由蘇格蘭聖安德魯斯皇家古老高爾夫球俱樂部及美國高爾夫球協會審定，世界通用的最權威職業和業余選手之行為規范用書。 -
“ chelsea fc were found to be in breach of rule k3 which prohibits a club making an approach to a contract player either directly or indirectly without first obtaining permission of the club to which he is under contract
"切爾西俱樂部違反了k3條例，該條例禁止任何俱樂部在未徵得球員所在俱樂部同意的情況下直接或間接與有合約在身的球員接洽。
分享友人