breach the contract 中文意思是什麼

breach the contract 解釋
違反合同
  • breach : n 1 (對法律、義務等的)破壞,違犯,違背,不履行;(對他人權利等的)侵害,侵犯。2 (友好關系的)...
  • the : 〈代表用法〉…那樣的東西,…那種東西。1 〈用單數普通名詞代表它的一類時(所謂代表的單數)〉 (a) 〈...
  • contract : n 1 契約,合同。2 婚約。3 承包(合約)。4 【法律】契約法。5 【牌戲】定約,合約橋牌。6 〈主英方〉...
  1. On the regime of anticipatory breach of contract

    芻議預期違約制度
  2. On the system of anticipatory breach of contract

    論預期違約制度
  3. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事法院及其上級法院就無單放貨案件審理的司法審判實踐研究,通過對十個法院判例的分析、歸納,筆者認為,在司法實踐中,法院越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛處理,而不認定為侵權行為糾紛;法院允許原告起訴時以侵權起訴或違約起訴作出選擇;法院對提單持有人的訴權認定,已經不採用「誰持有提單誰就有訴權」與「誰持有提單就能保證勝訴」的觀點;有諸多的無單放貨的訴訟案例以被法院駁回起訴為結局,證明了無單放貨在特定情況下的合理性以及承運人有避免承擔責任的可能性。
  4. The donator should compensate the loss of reliance interest arising from the execution of the right of revocation for his breach of contract

    任意撤回權的行使雖為法定,但贈與人亦應賠償受贈人因此所遭受的信賴利益損失,且其責任基礎不是一般所認為的締約過失責任而應是違約責任。
  5. Exclusion clauses seek to exclude the party, from breach of contract, or, limiting his liability on a breach of contract

    不屬保險范圍事項的條款:致力於減除合同違約方的違約責任或限定他們的責任。
  6. Sue to the court directly : agreement should be in duplicate, that ought to do not have your copartner autograph in your hand, but the another autograph on that agreement of company of illative and oriental meal is hind add ; you can be sued to the court, tell its break a contact, ask its are returned join in administration fee, bear responsibility of breach of contract and your loss

    直接向法院起訴:協議書應是一式兩份,你手中的那份應當沒有你合伙人的簽名,可推定東方餐飲公司的那份協議書上的另一簽名是后添加的;你可起訴至法院,訴其違約,要求其退還加盟治理費,並承擔違約責任和你的損失。
  7. I open a restaurant at signing contract of commodity chummage room to use as with landlord on november 18, 2006 ( at that time is the restaurant that makes over others ), this inn is in sha wan one in postern, my set up shop is less than a month, one in close, the business all the time very poor, but my chummage is handed in to all the time on june 20, 2007, on june 12 i move one part thing come home, because do not have a place to live at that time, live in inn all the time, after landlord sees, get on door lock instantly, cause me to cannot enter store, owe the charge of electricity that has a many month at that time, the water of 4 months is expended, landlord looks for me now must the evidence that i sign a beak a contract, otherwise continues to lease room set up shop, otherwise he i am sued in order to default water and electricity for cost, because water and electricity expends him to already was cleared on june 15, he defaults landlord of water charge of electricity to authority locks up the door in the regulation in the contract, the contract is written closely password code, urgent at that time set up shop, did not look careful, look now evil spirit eye, the penalty due to breach of contract in contract provision and amerce number are incomputable, i want to remove now contract, do not know what to idea there is

    我於2006年11月18日與房東簽訂了商品房租房合同用作開飯館(當時是轉讓別人的飯館) ,此店在沙灣一中后門,我開店不到一個月,一中封閉,生意一直很差,但我的房租一直交至2007年6月20日,在6月12日我將一部分東西搬回家,因為當時沒地方住,一直住在店裡,房東看到后立即將門鎖上,致使我無法進店,當時欠有一個多月的電費,四個月的水費,現在房東找我非要我簽一個違約的證據,要不繼續租房開店,要不他以拖欠水電費為由起訴我,因為水電費他已於6月15日交清,他在合同中規定拖欠水電費房東有權鎖門,合同寫得密密碼碼,當時急著開店,沒看仔細,現在一看煞了眼,合同條款中的違約金和罰款數都數不清,我現在想解除合同,不知有什麼辦法?
  8. However, the law ' s contents about anticipatory breach of contract is not rich enough : law provisions appearrelaxing and out of order and law terms do not mean the same

    一、不安抗辯權與明示預期違約的比較兩者的適用條件、行使依據、權屬性質均不同,兩者的差異比較明顯。
  9. Distress or seizure of property was the mode of satisfaction for breach of contract.

    扣押或佔有財產是對違反合同而獲取補償的一種方法。
  10. Anticipatory breach is closely related to concerned concepts - unassured pleadings or practical breach of the contract

    預期違約同不安抗辯權和實際違約有著密切的聯系。
  11. Basis " orders of sell of access of land of shenzhen special economic zone " the seventeenth regulation, contract of sell one ' s own things should have the following and main provision : ( one ) the full name of bilateral party or name, address ; ( 2 ) a ground date of access of land of sell one ' s own things, area ; ( 3 ) land is used year period reach case stop time ; ( 4 ) the amount of gold of land access sell one ' s own things, money is planted, pay kind and time ; ( 5 ) the time of consign land ; ( 6 ) point of program, municipal design ; ( 7 ) project complete is referred check and accept time ; ( 8 ) municipal facilities form a complete set builds obligation ; ( 9 ) land of use photograph adjacent and viatic limitation ; ( 10 ) the project that builds accessary, add establishment and obligation ; ( 11 ) responsibility of breach of contract ; ( 12 ) party thinks necessary other item

    根據《深圳經濟特區土地使用權出讓條例》第十七條的規定,出讓合同應具備以下主要條款: (一)雙方當事人的姓名或者名稱、地址; (二)出讓土地使用權的宗地號、面積; (三)土地使用年期及起止時間; (四)土地使用權出讓金的數額、幣種、交付方式及時間; (五)交付土地的時間; (六)規劃、市政設計要點; (七)項目竣工提交驗收時間; (八)市政設施配套建設義務; (九)使用相鄰土地和道路的限制; (十)建設附屬、附加設施的項目及義務; (十一)違約責任; (十二)當事人認為必要的其他條款。
  12. The provision of article 77 of cisg, which stipulates the mitigation duty of the aggrieved party, is one of significant limitations on article 74 of cisg, which establishes the principle of a general right to damages as a consequence of breach of contract

    公約第77條規定的減損原則是對國際貨物銷售合同損害賠償的重要限制。但該條規定是原則性的、概括性的,需在實踐中具體化。
  13. The rule of mitigation doctrine is applied when the following are satisfied. ( 1 ) the damage is resulted from the breach of contract by the party in breach, ( 2 ) the aggrieved party does not take reasonable steps to mitigate the damage, and ( 3 ) thus makes the damage aggravated

    減損規則的適用條件有三,一是損害的發生由違約方所致,二是受害方未採取合理措施防止損害擴大,三是損害因受害方未採取合理措施而擴大。
  14. Where a party ' s breach harmed the personal or property interests of the other party, the aggrieved party is entitled to elect to hold the party liable for breach of contract in accordance herewith, or hold the party liable for tort in accordance with any other relevant law

    第一百二十二條因當事人一方的違約行為,侵害對方人身、財產權益的,受損害方有權選擇依照本法要求其承擔違約責任或者依照其他法律要求其承擔侵權責任。
  15. Article 21. if both parties breach the contract, each shall be commensurately liable for the breach of contract that is its responsibility

    第二十一條當事人雙方都違反合同的,應當各自承擔相應的責任。
  16. The main types of college teachers ’ appointment contract include : the college teachers ’ of the fixed deadline, the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the deadline to complete the certain work, and the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the special attendance, and also we can get another two types of college teachers ’ appointment contract, which are individual college teachers ’ appointment contract and collective college teachers ’ appointment contract, according to the number of people in one party ; they must be work out by the strict written form, and must pass through the offer and the acceptance step, and don ’ t acknowledge the legal effect of the factual appointment contract ; after the appointment contract becomes effective, the higher college as the appointed party and the teacher as engaged party should completely fulfill the right and obligation provisions in the contract under the instructions of the three principles : fulfill personally, comprehensively, cooperatively. in which, the teachers ’ rights and obligations include : enjoy and undertake the rights and obligations as the specialist engaged in education, teaching and the scientific research ; may change or terminate the contract on the basis of the bilateral consultation, but dismissal and resignation must conform to the agreement or the legal matter ; in the liabilities for breach the contract, be headed by the practical fulfillment, including other two remedial way which are damage compensation and penalty ; in the dispute solution, must establish the perfect concrete mediation system, the arbitration and the civil lawsuit system

    高校教師聘任合同主要類型為固定期限的高校教師聘任合同、以完成一定工作為期限的高校教師聘任合同和特殊照顧的高校教師聘任合同,也可依據合同當事人一方人數的多寡不同,也可將個人高校教師聘任合同和集體高校教師聘任合同;其應當以嚴格的書面形式訂立,須經過要約、承諾步驟,且不應當承認事實聘任合同的法律效力;聘任合同生效后,作為聘任方的高等學校和受聘方的教師應當在親自履行、全面履行和協作履行三大原則的指導下完全履行合同中所約定的權利義務條款,其中教師的權利義務內容包括作為一般公民和作為從事教育教學及其科研活動的專業人員所應享有或者承擔的權利義務;經過雙方的協商可以變更或者終止合同,但解聘和辭聘必須符合約定或者法定的事由;在違約責任形式上,應當確立以實際履行為首,包括損害賠償、違約金等三種補救方式;在爭議解決方式上應當建立健全具體的調解制度、仲裁和民事訴訟制度。
  17. Article 113 if both parties breach the contract, each party shall bear its respective civil liability

    第一百一十三條當事人雙方都違反合同的,應當分別承擔各自應負的民事責任。
  18. Article 113. if both parties breach the contract, each party shall bear its respective civil liability. article 114

    第一百一十三條當事人雙方都違反合同的,應當分別承擔各自應負的民事責任。
  19. As to the research of contract law, it contains two main fields, the first is whether the contract is valid ; the second is what kind of validity the contract has if it is valid. further more, what kind of consequence has it, when one party breach the contract

    實際上就合同的研究而言,主要涉及的內容有兩大塊,其一是合同是否有效的問題;其二是合同生效以後其將發生何種效力或者說是何種後果的問題,進而是當事人違反了有效合同所產生之義務的法律後果問題。
  20. That is why there is uniform legal system as " tort of interference " to solve the problem on the third party infringes the creditor ' s right and we should use it for reference. the writer considers that the behavior of infringing the creditor ' s right is the third party, who knows the situation of debt relation and wants to infringe it, induces the debtor to breach the contract or block the creditor from exercising his right

    經過比較研究,在第三人侵害債權的構成問題上,筆者認為侵害債權行為是由第三人在明知債權存在並意欲侵害債權的主觀心態驅使下而為的引誘違約或阻礙債權實現的侵權行為,可為第三人所侵害的債權包括合法成立的債權和預期合同關系及商業利益,當侵害債權的行為造成對債權的實質損害時,侵權人應當獨立地直接對債權人承擔侵權責任。
分享友人