carriage of goods 中文意思是什麼

carriage of goods 解釋
貨物運輸
  • carriage : n 1 車；（四輪）馬車；〈英國〉（鐵路）客車車廂（＝〈美國〉car）；【航空】牽引車；（汽車的）座位。...
  • of : OF ＝Old French 古法語。
  • goods : n. 〈pl. 〉1. 商品，貨物〈美國說 freight〉。 ★不與數目字連用。2. 動產。3. 〈the goods〉 〈美口〉本領；不負所望的人[物]。
  1. This thesis is planed to analyze and demonstrate this obligation in detail, and tries to clarify the issues below : 1, the differences in the obligation standards among the carrier, the common carrier and the bailee, and the differences in the obligation standards between care of cargo and making the ship seaworthy ; 2, combined with the cases and shipping practice, solving the problems which is produced in fulfilling the obligation ; 3, with the principle of law, analyzing the character of the responsibility which should assume when the care of cargo obligation is breached ; 4, introducing the provisions about care o f cargo obligation in preliminary draft instrument on the carriage of goods by sea and expressing my opinions

    本文擬對這一義務進行詳細的分析和論證，試圖闡明以下幾個方面的問題： 1 、承運人管貨義務所要求的「妥善和謹慎」的標準與公共承運人、託管人管貨義務的標準的區別，與承運人適航義務的標準「克盡職責」的區別； 2 、結合有關案例和航運實務，分析該條文字面所表述的管貨義務的各個環節在實際運用中的相關問題； 3 、從法理的角度分析違反管貨義務所應承擔的責任的性質； 4 、介紹正在制訂的《海上貨物運輸法》 （草案）中關于承運人管貨義務的規定，並提出自己的意見。
  2. Goods may be stowed in poop, forecastle, deck house, shelter deck, passenger space or any other covered - in space commonly used in the trade and suitable for the carriage of goods, and when so stowed shall be deemed for all purposes to be stowed under deck

    七、貨物可裝放在船尾、前甲板、甲板室、遮蔽甲板、客倉或任何其他通常用於貿易並適合貨運的有掩蔽的場所，貨物如此裝放時，應視為裝放在倉內。
  3. The determinative principle to carrier ' s liability is the most attractive content in carrier ' s liability system in carriage of goods by sea

    摘要海上承運人的責任制度中，最為引人注目的內容當屬海上承運人責任的歸責原則。
  4. One is a general introduction of the contract law and contracts of carriage of gx > ods by water ; the other is a detailed consideration about the general rule ' s influences on the latter specific contracts. in the first part, the author introduces contracts of carriage of goods by water and laws concerning contracts of carriage of goods by water. due to many special rules and easterns existing in the shipping fields, making the difference between various contracts of carriage of goods by water will be helpful to fibber comprehend different circumstances arising in the course of the performance of this kind of contract, and to find the common character and the difference indicated

    本文正文總體分為兩個部分，第一部分系對於水上貨物運輸合同和水上貨物運輸合同法作概括性的介紹，從水上貨物運輸合同的分類入手，通過從不同角度對水上貨物運輸合同作出的不同分類，把不同種類的水上貨物運輸合同所體現出的特性與作為商事合同所體現出的共性相結合，為準確的闡述《合同法》總則這一概括總結性規定對水運合同的影響提供基礎。
  5. According to china ' s maritime code, the liabiiity of breaching a contract of carriage of goods by sea is determined by whether the breaching party has f8ult or not, while it aiso stipuiates in articie 51 that ; " the carrier shaii not be iiable for the loss of or damage to the goods occurred during the period of carrier ' s responsibility arising or resulting from any of the foiiowing causes ( ( 1 ) fault of the mastef, crew members, pilot or servant of the carrier in the navigation or management of the ship "

    我國海商法在海上貨物運輸方面的承運人違約責任之歸責採取過錯責任原則，但因其在第51條又規定「船長、船員、引航員或者承運人的其他受僱人在駕駛船舶或管理船舶中的過失」承運人不負賠償責任。因為這一點，海商法學界稱之為不完全過失責任制。
  6. If parties to a contract do not expressly or impliedly choose the applicable law, the proper law for the contract should be constructed through the rule of closest connection. this paper states the proper law for various kinds of contracts of carriage of goods by sea based on the rule of closest connection

    但上述所講的是通常情況下的法律選擇原則，如果從整體情況看，運輸合同與另一個國家的關系更為密切，則前面所確定的一般推定準據法不予適用，而應適用與合同有更密切聯系的國家的法律。
  7. Cmi has been endeavoring the international unification of the law relating to carrier ' s liability system arising out of the carriage of goods by sea since 1907. the hague rules which was adopted in 1924 started the beginning of the unification of carrier ' s liability system

    自1907年以來， cmi就一直致力於海上貨物運輸法承運人責任制度的國際統一，並於1924年制定了海牙規則，開創了承運人責任制度統一的先河，隨著1968年修訂海牙規則維斯比議定書的通過，統一的程度有所降低。
  8. Having this in mind, researching methodologies and ideas of this paper are based on the analysis of general principles of burden of proof in civil law. meanwhile, taking into account the specialties of shipping law, this paper compared the rules of burden of proof among hague rules, hague - visby rules, hamburg rules, draft of united states carriage of goods by sea act 1999 ( cogsa ), china maritime code and china contract act 2000

    有鑒於此，本論文對海運貨損索賠舉證責任的研究是建立在對一般民事舉證責任分析的基礎上，結合海商法特點，重點對《海牙規則》 、 《海牙威斯比規則》 、 《漢堡規則》 、美國1999年海上貨物運輸法草案以及我國《合同法》 、 《海商法》對海運貨損索賠舉證責任的規定做了具體的比較和分析。
  9. In the third part, the writer firstly is in an attempt to analyze rules of burden of proof in the importantly international conventions, namely hague rules, hague - visby rules and hamburg rules. by paying a close scrutiny on judicial precedents in different countries, the different approaches on the burden of proof in these conventions have been further stressed. under the international criticisms towards these approaches, the united states has drafted its carriage of goods by

    另一方面，在各國對規則要求進行修改的呼聲中，美國已推出了1999年海上貨物運輸法草案，美國作為世界上經濟一大強國，這部法律的出臺肯定會對我國海商領域產生重大的影響，在該草案中在舉證責任方面做了許多有別于現有國際公約的規定，因此在本論文中對美國99cogsa的相關規定也做了具體評析。
  10. Shipper is an important party among contract of carriage of goods by sea

    在海上運輸合同中，托運人是一個十分重要的主體。
  11. In different legal system, that is distinct. ship owner, ship manager and shipping agent, taking part in the transport trade, always affect finding the carrier. in many countries, " carrier " means any person by whom or in whose name a contract of carriage of goods by sea has been concluded with a shipper

    不同法律制度下， 「承運人」的定義有所區別： 《海牙規則》把承運人限定為與托運人訂有海上運輸契約的船舶所有人和承租人； 《漢堡規則》及包括我國在內的多數國家把承運人定義為與托運人訂有海上運輸契約的任何人。
  12. Article 2 " maritime transport " as referred to in this code means the carriage of goods and passengers by sea, including the sea - river and river - sea direct transport

    第二條本法所稱海上運輸，是指海上貨物運輸和海上旅客運輸，包括海江之間、江海之間的直達運輸。
  13. Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law

    第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質，筆者認為，無單放貨具有違約性，因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務；無單放貨具有侵權性，只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件，無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任；同時，無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時，我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權，但對實體法請求權的選擇，法律作出了一定范圍的限制；最後，無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展，我們不能一概加以否定，無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。
  14. In practice of carriage of goods by sea, the individuai shipper is the consumer of service, beiongs to a weak social group, so that the party who needs protection by the iaw shaii be the shipper but not the carriel howevef

    在海上貨物運輸中，廣大的貨物托運人是「消費者」 ，屬於弱勢群體，應當受到法律的保護。但現存的航海過失免責，卻與此相背，不能不令人遺憾。
  15. Article 41 a contract of carriage of goods by sea is a contract under which the carrier, against payment of freight, undertakes to carry by sea the goods contracted for shipment by the shipper from one port to another

    第四十一條海上貨物運輸合同，是指承運人收取運費，負責將托運人托運的貨物經海路由一港運至另一港的合同。
  16. Coa is a contract of carriage of goods by sea in essence, under which the carrier, during the agreed period, against payment of freight undertakes to carry the goods in agreed amount for divided shipments by the shipper from the agreed loading port to the discharging port. during implementation, the specific voyages should be governed by the agreed voyage chaterparty which is agreed upon between shipper and carrier after the conclusion of coa

    通過比較分析，作者認為，包運合同是指，承運人在約定期間內分批將約定數量貨物從約定裝貨港運至約定目的港的協議，在履行協議過程中，依航次租船合同對分批具體航次履行作進一步約定，最終實現承運人提供海上貨物運輸服務並收取運費的目的的海上貨物運輸合同。
  17. As a large country in which ocean shipping is important, the distribution of the right and duty in the international conventions of carriage of goods by sea directly effects the development of our marine

    同時，作為一個海運大國，海上運輸的國際公約對各利益方權利義務的劃分也直接影響著我國海運業的發展。
  18. Article 80 where a carrier has issued a document other than a bill of lading as an evidence of the receipt of the goods to be carried, such a document is prima facie evidence of the conclusion of the contract of carriage of goods by sea and the taking over by the carrier of the goods as described therein

    第八十條承運人簽發提單以外的單證用以證明收到待運貨物的，此項單證即為訂立海上貨物運輸合同和承運人接收該單證中所列貨物的初步證據。
  19. This paper aims at studying the carrier ' s liability regime in the carriage of goods by waterway in china, elaborates the main contents of the carrier ' s liability regime including the period of responsibility, rules of liability, scope of liability, limitation of liability and non - contractual clai7m with the methods of comparative analysis, normative analysis, positive analysis and combining national law with international law

    本文以我國水路貨物運輸承運人責任制度為研究對象，運用比較分析的研究方法，並適當採用規范分析、實證分析、國內法與國際法相結合的論證方法，對承運人責任制度的主要內容，包括責任期間、歸責原則、賠償責任范圍、責任限制以及非合同之訴等問題進行了系統闡述。
  20. International sale of goods, international carriage of goods by sea, international trade finance, international banking regulation

    期望在一定規模的公司企業中從事于國際貿易，遠洋貨物運輸，銀行單證業務相關的業務。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書