civil wrong 中文意思是什麼
civil wrong
解釋
民事不法行為-
The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive
民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁判錯誤的法定程序，雖然它不是案件審理的必經程序，也不是訴訟的獨立審級，但其對保護當事人合法權益，保障司法公正，發揮了積極作用，但由於現在有些審判監督程序規定的過于原則，或不完整不合理，實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范，在一定程度上也阻礙了審判監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。 -
Civil wrong against persons or property is called " torts
錯誤扣押某人的侵權行為。 -
Two kinds of deep conflicts are contained in our country ' s adjudicatory supervision of the civil cases, that is, the conflict between the principle of uto seek truth from facts, to rectify whatever is wrong " and the steadinees of efficient adjudircation and the conflict between enlargement of adjudication supervision power and exercise of litigious right and disposing right of the parties
我國的民事再審程序蘊涵著兩種深層沖突，即「實事求是，有錯必糾」原則與生效裁判穩定性之間的沖突，以及審判監督權的擴張與當事人訴權、處分權行使之間的沖突。 -
The third chapter mainly focuses on the civil indemnity liability originating from the securities manipulation. to begin with, the first part ascertains that such kind of torts generally trepasses on the object of so - called " pure economic interest ' mn next part, it demonstrates in detail the requisites with which would incur a civil damage liability. regarding the fault ( including both intention and negligence ), it put forward a viewpoint that we should impose the civil liability upon manipulations of chinese securities market on the basis of constructive fault principle. about the question of iniuria ( wrong ), the author studies two aspects, one is assumption of risk, the other is the model of determining iniuria and solutions proposed
其中第一節首先明確了操縱市場這種侵權行為的客體即所謂「純粹財產上利益」 。第二節具體闡明了操縱市場行為民事賠償責任的構成要件。在過錯部分提出要以推定過失責任原則為基礎追究我國證券市場操縱行為的民事責任，違法部分研究了自甘冒險行為和違法認定模式及對策兩個問題，其中違法認定模式是一個創新，對改變我國目前證券市場民事索賠必須先由證監會認定違法的機制給予了批判。 -
Civil wrong against persons or property is called " torts "
針對人或財產的民事不規行為稱之為「侵權」 。 -
A civil case is a lawsuit or legal action undertaken in the civil courts to obtain money damages for a civil wrong
民事案件是民事法院管理的因民事侵權行為而要求得到損害賠償金的訴訟案件或法律訴訟。 -
The theory of fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract was mentioned by germen jurits rudolf vou jhering in 1861. its meaning is when one party ' s civil wrong broke the statutory duty of reasonable care arisen from the principle of good faith, during the process of contacting and negotiation for contract, and cause other party ' s interests or reliance interest damages, the former must compensate for the later ' s loss. statutory obligation for fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract is different from that for breach of contract and that for tortuous acts
本文主要從以下幾個方面對締約過失責任理論、法律制度方面需完善的問題進行探討：一、對締約過失責任的概念和構成進行探討：二、對締約過失責任中缺失的對精神損害救濟的法律規定問題進行全面、系統的分析、論述；三、論述了締約過失責任與違約責任並存和競合的情形，在合同法上應允許締約過失責任與違約責任的並存、競合，充分保護權利人的合法利益；四、對締約過失責任法律制度應注重對締約過失行為的監控問題進行探討。 -
From all the legislation systems and precedent we can see that pure wrong is not the main cause of discharging contract and the severity of result caused by civil wrong is the basic reason, while the severity of result is based on whether the purpose of contract can be reached or not
總結合同解除事由的所有立法例及判例可知，單純的過錯並非合同解除的主要根據，以過錯作判斷因素之一的違約後果具有嚴重性才是合同解除的根本原因，而判斷違約後果是否嚴重，各國大都以合同訂立的主要目的能否實現為依據。 -
He stated his position clearly when he said that slack staff, slack management and wasting of public money would not be tolerated. in fact, earlier on in the debate on the policy address on 22 october 1998, i have already made the point that what the public saw was a civil service that could " do no wrong, take no blame, and receive no punishment ". also, in the legco meeting on 10 march 1999, i motioned the debate on " civil service culture and efficiency "
其實，早在1998年10月22日的施政報告辯論中，我就批評市民見到的是一個永遠無出錯、無人管、無獎罰的公務員隊伍，並繼續在1999年3月10日的立法會會議上，就公務員效率和文化提出動議，向政府提出清楚的改革方向，期望政府能順應民意，作出強本之道，來為制度保值，甚至增值，並且呼籲不改革不足以成事。 -
Chapter 3, guided by the basic theory of civil compensation for misrepresentation tort damages, deals with those who have caused damage to investors and shall be liable to pay compensation, including the issuer, the underwriter, directors and certified accountants for the wrong committed by them
第三部分：以虛假陳述民事侵權損害賠償基本理論為指導，具體分析了證券市場不同主體，包括發行人、證券承銷商、董事、注冊會計師等的過錯責任承擔。 -
And then analysed the object of extinctive prescreption ’ definitions which were made by the contemporary scholars, found that we should be from the angle of disappearance instead the scope of application of the civil rights, makes the object of extinctive prescreption a definition that the rights which disappeared after certain facts last for a legal period. then, by analysed the history and the present condition of the object of extinctive prescreption, the author combed the development trajectory of the object of extinctive prescreption, summarizes the main sample of the legal statutes and theory concerning about in contemporary times, found that some scholars have something wrong in their methods, study point and conclusions when they study the object of extinctive prescreption. so, it is necessary to seek new way to investigate the object of extinctive prescreption
然後對當代學者關于消滅時效客體的界定進行了分析，發現應自權利消滅而非適用范圍的角度，將消滅時效客體界定為一定事實狀態因時間經過的作用而消滅的權利。進而通過對消滅時效客體的歷史與現狀分析，理清了消滅時效客體的歷史發展軌跡，總結了當代消滅時效客體的主要立法例和學說;通過考察，發現有些學者對消滅時效客體的研究，其方法、切入點和結論上都存在一些問題。有必要在找準切入點的前提下重新考察消滅時效的客體。 -
A tort is a civil as opposed to a criminal wrong
侵權是一種與刑事過錯相對應的民事過錯。 -
By reviewing a civil lawsuit case of fake credit card use, combining common practice and basing on relevant law regulations, three focuse issues are put forward in this article, that is : commercial customers have or not have the duty to examine and compare the signature with pos signature ; how to identify the responsibility when credit card is lost, pilfered and credit transaction taken play before credit card holder reporting the loss of credit card in the condition of secret code plus signature ; the relevant departments have or not have the suitable law basis to the disputes arising from " wrong tally signature "
摘要回顧一起關于信用卡冒用訴訟案的案例，結合工作實踐，立足相關的法律法規，提出關于「簽名爭議」的三個焦點問題，即商戶有無義務認真審查信用卡背面的簽名與pos單上的簽名一致；對于「密碼簽名」的信用卡，發生失竊、冒用等情況，在掛失前已產生非本人交易時，責任如何界定；對于由「簽名不符」引發的爭議，相關部門有無適用的法律依據。 -
To resolve these problems, the guidance principle " to seek truth from facts, to rectify whateveris wrong " must be changed. then the prosecutorial surpervision of civil litigation of our country needs to be reamende d. at last, the important of the adjudicatory supervision jadges and adjudicatory supervision divisions should be noticed, and the adjudicatory supervision courts will come up in the furture
針對這些缺陷，文章提出首先要改進觀念，樹立「依法糾錯」的理念；其次在立法上對民事審判監督程序的各個部分重新構架；最後還要在制度上給予保障，重視審監法官和審監庭，以及嘗試建立再審法院。
分享友人