claim in tort 中文意思是什麼

claim in tort 解釋
因侵權行為產生的請求權
  • claim : n 1 (根據權利而提出的)要求,請求;認領,索取。2 (應得的)權利;(…的)資格。3 主張,斷言,聲稱...
  • in : adv 1 朝里,向內,在內。 A coat with a furry side in有皮裡子的外衣。 Come in please 請進來。 The ...
  • tort : n. 【法律】侵權行為。
  1. However, introducing the system of liability for tort to the protection of claim breaks the relativity principle of the debt in the traditional civil law theory

    但是,將侵權責任制度引入對債權的保護,打破了傳統民法理論中債的相對性原則。
  2. In any event, subject to 1. above and any applicable limitation under the warsaw convention or under cpa s conditions of travel, the liability of cplp and or cpa in contract, tort or otherwise with respect to any claim arising in respect of acts or omissions in operating the club shall be limited to the value of the ticket being used by the member in connection with which the matter arises or hkd10, 000 whichever is greater. cplp will endeavour to ensure the availability of services of the club when these are provided by partners but will not be liable for any loss arising from the failure by partners to provide such services

    在任何情況下,於前述第1段及華沙協定有關民航損失賠償之多邊協定或國泰航空之旅遊守則所訂定予國泰常客計劃之義務,及或國泰航空之契約民事侵犯或侵害,或在不同情況之下的責任限制,如遇有任何因本會運作之行為或錯漏而提出之索償,本會只限於根據有關事件,補發會員于購買該機票所付之總金額或10 , 000港元以較高者為準。
  3. Second, discusses the imputation of the liability of trademark right, and points out : it is practicable to establish the system of " right of the real claim " or " right of intellectual property claim ", with succeeding and perfecting the system of liability for tort at the same time ; the compensation for damage of infringement of trademark right should take the principle liability for fault as the main liability principle and the principle liability for fault inferred as a complement. third, discusses the excuses which may be as a plea in the action of the infringement of trademark right, such as fair use, prior right, forfeiter of trademark right. at last, approach the subject that how to apply and perfect legal proceedings and alter ways to the remedies of trademark right

    接著,探討了侵犯商標權責任的認定,指出:可在繼承與完善我國侵權民事責任制度的同時設立物上請求權或知識產權上請求權制度來保護商標權;侵犯商標權的損害賠償宜採用過錯責任為主、過錯推定責任為輔的歸責原則;隨后,探討了侵犯商標權訴訟中可以作為抗辯的事由,如合理使用、在先權、商標權無效等;最後,探討了運用和完善訴訟和訴訟外兩種方式救濟商標權的問題。
  4. In the event that a court should hold that the limitations on ups s liability set forth in this agreement are unenforceable for any reason, or that any of your remedies fail of their essential purpose, you agree that in no event shall ups s total liability for any damages direct or otherwise or loss regardless of the form of action or claim, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, exceed usd 10. 00

    如果法院裁定本協議所規定的ups責任限制基於任何理由而無法執行,或閣下的任何補償未能達到其基本目的,則閣下同意,在任何情況下, ups對任何損害直接或其他形式或損失的全部責任,無論訴訟或索賠形式如何,不管是否基於合同侵權行為或其他原因,均不超過10 . 00美元。
  5. The general thinking to complete the s > stem of judicial identification responsibility of our country is to change from the unilateral emphasis on the right of identification to the emphasis on both the obligation principle of the right of identification and interested person in aspect of legal obligation of identifier, from responsibility of unity to responsibility to natural person in aspect of responsible body, from criminal and administrative responsibility as major to civil responsibility as major in aspect of the content of responsibility, from contractual responsibility and tort responsibility as major to the combination of claim and tort of responsibility as major in aspect of the nature of responsibility, and finally in aspect of the realization of compensation to establish the system of practicing insurance or supplementing each other

    完善我國司法鑒定責任制度的總體思路是:在鑒定人的法定義務上,應由單方面注重鑒定權主義的義務觀向鑒定權主義義務觀與當事人主義義務觀並重轉變;在責任主體上,應由機構責任向自然人責任轉變;在責任內容上,應由刑事責任、行政責任為主向以民事責任為主轉變;在責任性質上,應由以契約責任、侵權責任為主向以侵權責任、請求權競合為主轉變;在賠償實現上,建立鑒定人執業保險或執業互濟制度。
分享友人