copyright act 中文意思是什麼
copyright act
解釋
著作權法案-
The exhaustion of exclusive right of modern copyright act
現代版權法上的權利窮竭 -
The best ways quot; the copyright act of cpc quot; agrees with editing work
與編輯加工的契合點 -
Digital millennium copyright act of 1998
1998頒布的數碼千歲版權法 -
Software copyright act of
軟體版權法案 -
Digital millennium copyright act - notification to american express regarding alleged copyright infringement
對美國運通提出關于侵犯版權指控之通知 -
Hewlett - packard has abandoned its attempt to suppress security information via the digital millenium copyright act
惠普公司放棄了利用《千禧年數字版權法》禁止發布有關（其公司操作軟體的）安全情況的嘗試。 -
Warning : by south african copyright act, you can ' t bring this document in south africa or download from south africa
警告：根據南非版權法，禁止將本文檔攜帶到南非境內，請在前往南非前刪除本文檔，如果你在南非，禁止下載本文檔。 -
In 1994, the indian copyright act was amended to clearly explain the rights of a copyright holder and the penalties for infringement of copyrighted software
1994年，新修改的印度著作權法明確規定了著作者的權利以及盜版者的處罰 -
Similarly, the united states revision of its copyright act in 1909 broadened copyright protection to music and further to all works of authorship
（類似地，美國1909年對copyright act的修訂，將版權擴展到保護音樂以及所有原創作品。 -
Now, let ' s read the sectio 106 and 110 ( 5 ) of us copyright act 1998 to see whether some change has been made
該貿易爭端的核心是美國版權法110節第5段。據歐盟方面而言，該段對《美國版權法》第106節所給予權利持有人的專有權施加了更多的限制。 -
Now, let ' s read the sections 106 and 110 ( 5 ) of us copyright act 1998 to see whether some change has been made
該貿易爭端的核心是美國版權法110節第5段。據歐盟方面而言，該段對《美國版權法》第106節所給予權利持有人的專有權施加了更多的限制。 -
On one aspect, through long - term judicial precedent, the united states has been tallied up three types of liability for copyright infrigement by isps, they are direct copyright liability, contributory copyright liability, and vicarious copyright liability ; on the other aspect, title ii of the dmca adds a new section 512 to the copyright act to create five limitations on liability for copyright infringement by isps, which is called “ safe harbors ”, finding out an understanding to definitely break for the problem of beneficial equilibrium in copyright protection, which has already perplexed educational circles for a long time
在isp著作權侵權的責任類型方面，美國經過長期的司法判例實踐，總結了直接侵權責任、輔助侵權責任和替代侵權責任三種;在isp著作權侵權的責任限制方面，美國的dmca在其第二部分規定了五種「安全港」 ，為長期以來困擾學界的著作權保護利益平衡問題找到了解決的突破口。 -
Compared with the previous section 110 ( 5 ) of us copyright act 1976, the su aragraph ( b ) was i erted, which has made a big difference and brought about a trade di ute between the eu and us
將98版美國版權法案第110節第5段與76版一比較，我們發現新插入了（ b ）小段，這就產生了很大的不同，並導致了歐盟與美國之間的貿易爭端。 -
Compared with the previous section 110 ( 5 ) of us copyright act 1976, the subparagraph ( b ) was inserted, which has made a big difference and brought about a trade dispute between the eu and us
將98版美國版權法案第110節第5段與76版一比較，我們發現新插入了（ b ）小段，這就產生了很大的不同，並導致了歐盟與美國之間的貿易爭端。 -
Section 110 ( 5 ) of the united states copyright act, as amended by the " fairne in music lice ing act " enacted on 27 october 1998, exempts, under certain conditio, the communication or tra mi ion embodying a performance or di lay of a work by the public reception of the tra mi ion on a single receiving a aratus of a kind commonly used in private homes ( sub - paragraph a, referred to as " homestyle exemption " ) and, also under certain conditio, communication by an establishment of a tra mi ion or retra mi ion embodying a performance or di lay of a non - dramatic musical work intended to be received by the general public ( su aragraph b, often referred to as " busine exemption " ) from obtaining an authorization to do so by the re ective right holder
美國版權法110節第5段經1998年10月27日頒布的《音樂許可公平法案》修正，規定了，在一定條件下，傳播或傳送含有公眾可以在一種在私人家庭中經常使用的單一接收裝置上接收到的一件作品的表演或展示（ a小段稱為"家庭免除） ；以及在一定條件下，一個設施傳送或二次傳送旨在讓公眾接收的含有非戲劇音樂作品的表演或展示，可以不必獲得分別的版權持有人的授權。 -
More recently, a revision of the u. s. copyright act in 1976 extended copyright protection to unpublished works and codified what constitutes " fair use. " and in 1998, the united states much - maligned and sometimes ambiguous digital millennium copyright act granted protection to boat hull designs and allowed computer users to make temporary copies of computer programs for the purpose of maintenance among other changes
）更近一點， 1976年美國對copyright act的修訂，將版權擴展到保護未出版的作品，並編寫了「正當使用」的條款。 1998年，美國的（受盡誹謗和誤解） digital millennium copyright act給予船體設計以保護，並允許計算機用戶為維護目的而對計算機程序進行臨時復制（還可做其他修改） 。 -
In practice this mea that section 110 ( 5 ) of the us copyright act permits under certain circumstances, the playing of radio and television music in public places ( such as bars, sho, restaurants etc. ) without the payment of a royalty fee
在實踐中，這意味著美國版權法110節第5段允許在一定情況下，在公眾場所（例如酒吧、商店、飯店等）播放廣播及電視中的音樂，不必交版權費。 -
In practice this means that section 110 ( 5 ) of the us copyright act permits under certain circumstances, the playing of radio and television music in public places ( such as bars, shops, restaurants etc. ) without the payment of a royalty fee
在實踐中，這意味著美國版權法110節第5段允許在一定情況下，在公眾場所（例如酒吧、商店、飯店等）播放廣播及電視中的音樂，不必交版權費。 -
Section 110 ( 5 ) of the united states copyright act, as amended by the " fairness in music licensing act " enacted on 27 october 1998, exempts, under certain conditions, the communication or transmission embodying a performance or display of a work by the public reception of the transmission on a single receiving apparatus of a kind commonly used in private homes ( sub - paragraph a, referred to as " homestyle exemption " ) and, also under certain conditions, communication by an establishment of a transmission or retransmission embodying a performance or display of a non - dramatic musical work intended to be received by the general public ( subparagraph b, often referred to as " business exemption " ) from obtaining an authorization to do so by the respective right holder
美國版權法110節第5段經1998年10月27日頒布的《音樂許可公平法案》修正，規定了，在一定條件下，傳播或傳送含有公眾可以在一種在私人家庭中經常使用的單一接收裝置上接收到的一件作品的表演或展示（ a小段稱為"家庭免除） ；以及在一定條件下，一個設施傳送或二次傳送旨在讓公眾接收的含有非戲劇音樂作品的表演或展示，可以不必獲得分別的版權持有人的授權。 -
After an investigation made by the european commi ion, the eu decided to challenge the exemptio permitted in section 110 ( 5 ) of the us copyright act, as they were believed to cause unreasonable prejudice to composers, performers and publishers of music
在歐盟委員會調查之後，歐盟決定挑戰美國版權法110節第5段所允許的例外，因為該例外被認為對音樂作者、表演者和發行人造成了不合理的侵害。
分享友人