criminal objects 中文意思是什麼
criminal objects
解釋
犯罪物件-
According to studying the necessity of contract fraud crime, the " contract " which is used to defraud the opposite party, the concept and feature of contract fraud crime, the criminal component of contract fraud crime, the difference between contract fraud crime and civil fraudulent acting contract fraud crime and fraud crime contract fraud crime and loan fraud crime, and punishment of contract fraud crime, the article holds the opinion : as a new crime, the subjective element of contract fraud crime shall be for the purpose of illegal possession and the object of the crime is complicate object. the violated objects should include the property and illegal interest of the opposite party
本文通過對新刑法設立合同詐騙罪之必要，合同詐騙罪之「合同」 ，合同詐騙罪之概念、特點，合同詐騙罪之犯罪構成，合同詐騙與民事欺詐、詐騙罪、貸款詐騙罪的界限以及對合同詐騙罪的處罰等問題的探討，認為合同詐騙罪作為新刑法增設的罪名，主觀方面應當要求「以非法佔有為目的」 ，合同詐騙罪侵犯的是復雜客體，侵犯的對象的范圍應擴大到「對方當事人財物及財產上的不法利益」 。 -
Part two, constitutive elements : according to theory of constitutive elements and combing the stipulation of criminal code 263, i holds that the main object of robbery is property right, and dissects through going the criminal objects from six aspects emphatically ; objective elements of robbery is action which occupies unlawfully public and private property in violent ^ coercive or other ways ; the subject of the crime is general subject ; subject requisites of the crime is deliberation and its purpose is unlawful occupation
第二部分，搶劫罪的犯罪構成：文章根據犯罪構成理論，結合刑法第263條之規定，認為本罪的主要客體應是財產權利，並重點從六個方面對本罪的犯罪對象進行了深入剖析；本罪的客觀方面表現為採用暴力、脅迫或其他方法非法佔有公私財物的行為；本罪的主體是一般主體；本罪的主觀方面是故意，並以非法佔有為目的。 -
The text of this paper discusses the crime objects of embezzlement from four aspects : chapter i : provisions of ancient and modem criminal law to embezzlement crime. this part introduce the provisions regarding embezzlement crime in chinese past dynasties, putting focus on investigating the provisions regarding crime objects of embezzlement. the earliest provisions about embezzlement in china appeared in the warring states, and oin dynasty had some relevant rules. while tang dynasty, which stood at the height of power and splendor for political and economic development in feudalism society, prescribed more detailed embezzlement crime and gave a definite classification to the crime objectives. the objectives of crime stipulated in tang dynasty law consist of commissioned property, loaned property, lost property and hidden property generally
筆者認為，不動產可以成為侵占罪對象;對于種類物能否成為侵占罪的犯罪對象應該具體分析;無形物可以成為侵占罪對象;知識產品不能成為侵占罪的對象;違禁物和贓物不宜成為侵占罪的犯罪對象。 「遺忘物」和「遺失物」二者不能等同，遺失物不是侵占罪的犯罪對象，埋藏物既包括私人所有的埋藏物，也包括屬于國家或集體所有的埋藏物。文章在最後指出，應用「遺失物」取代「遺忘物」 ;應將脫離他人持有的財物作為侵占罪的犯罪對象。 -
Thus, a person is the essence of objects domination, control. when the concept was introduced legal life vision, the concept will be given specific meaning, and make it legally binding. the adjusted target for criminal acts is the main line to start a concept study
英美刑法中將持有歸結為「事態」 ，是一個包含著行為人、行為人的主觀罪過形式、對物的佔有行為（持有） 、被持有的物的認識等一系列主客觀因素的概念，它應該與大陸法系中的犯罪構成是同一層次的概念。 -
The embezzlement is a new added charge of our national revised criminal law in 1997, which has significant meanings in filling the blank of our national criminal law regarding to the embezzlement crime. it offers more definite basis to the justice and an effective mean to protect the public and private property, enhance the honesty and mutual trust, and maintain the usual social footing. however, as a new crime, as the poor experience of legislation and generalization of the act own, the embezzlement crime arises many disputations to the relevant problems in the theory field, and has lots of questions in the justice practice, which refer to all constitutive elements of embezzlement crime. the writer of this paper plans to discuss specially the crime objects of embezzlement based on the research results of other scholars and justicial workers
侵占罪是現實中一種多發性犯罪，理論界和司法實踐中對侵占罪的犯罪對象問題爭議頗多。因而研究侵占罪的犯罪對象具有重要的理論和現實意義。本文對我國歷史上關于侵占罪的犯罪對象的立法狀況進行整理和回顧，並分析了其他國家和地區有關侵占罪的相關法條，以期借鑒其合理成熟的規定。
分享友人