criteria score 中文意思是什麼

criteria score 解釋
判別分數
  • criteria : n. criterion 的復數。
  • score : n 1 ?痕,截痕,刻痕,劃線;痕,抓痕;鞭痕;裂縫;記號。2 對號籌片。3 計算;百分數,成份;【運】比...
  1. Objective : to determine if the use of the score of students as the criteria to decide the continuity of the contracts would result in provision of more fast foods, higher calories and inconcordance with the calories labels in the manu

    目的:想探討委外經營管理辦法中的以學生評分決定是否繼續合約的依據的作法是否會影響廠商提供較多速食類食品,進而提供較高熱量且不符合菜單標示的熱量計算。
  2. The author holds that a pre - test training may help examinees familiarize themselves with testing procedure, acquire a knowledge of phonetics, have an understanding of test criteria and their own pronunciation, enhance their confidence in themselves, improve their capability of adapting themselves to the test, overcome their nervousness, allay their anxiety and score ideal achievements in the test

    筆者認為可通過考前培訓幫助應試者熟悉考試程序,掌握一定的語音知識,對測試標準和自身的語音面貌有所認識,增強應試者的自信心和心理承受能力,緩解他們的緊張和焦慮,在測試中取得理想成績。
  3. Indexes are made up of economic, environmental and social indicators. while evaluating, firstly auditors choose proper indexes and criteria ; secondly ascertain weight ; then calculate combine score ; at last, confirm the performance level of the audited entity based on score

    在具體評價被審計對象時,根據被審計對象的目標和實際情況,選擇適當的指標和評價標準,賦予適當的權數,計算被審計對象的綜合得分,根據所得分數確定被審計單位的績效水平。
  4. Examiners award a band score for each of four criterion areas : fluency and coherence, lexical resource, grammatical range and accuracy and pronunciation. the four criteria are equally weighted

    考官依據四大標準范圍評判每一個分數段的成績:流利性和一致性、豐富的詞藻、文法的應用范圍和使用精確度以及正確的發音。這四大標準的比重也是完全相同的。
  5. The features of the new edition are : comprehensively reflecting enterprise performance, centered on efficiency ; combining quantitative indices and qualitative indices progressively ; determining the total score of basic indices by graded basic score and adjustment score set by work - result coefficient ; determining adjustment coefficient and basic evaluation score by the coordination of adjustment indices and basic in - dices ; and reducing the subjectivity in evaluation through reference criteria of evaluation

    新版效績評價指標體系和計分方法的特點是:以效益為核心,全面反映企業效績;逐級遞進,定量指標和定性指標相結合;分檔基礎分和根據功效系數確定的調整分決定基本指標總得分;修正指標和基本指標協調程度決定修正系數大小和基本評價得分;依託評議參考標準,降低評議的主觀隨意性。
  6. Structure validity of the questionnaire. the items were filtrated according to three evaluation criteria. three sub - scales manifested individual personality scale 5. 8 sd 0. 4895 power and norm 5. 1 sd 0. 6223 interrelationship 4. 7 sd 0. 6189. it showed that managers influence upon their subordinates mainly depended on their individual charm and personality and their effort to establish an informal authority, which was indeed an effective and recommendable way in enhancing one s influence in an organization. the managers could be divided into two groups, who showed significant variations on the three sub - scale variables of power, relationship and personality. concerning these three variables, groups of high and low scores obviously differ from one another. the low - score group probably remained on a relatively lower level with regard to their way of influencing their subordinates. improvement through some training was therefore needed. this study offered an effective tool for the training of managers individual influences

    3個分量表表現出個人風格5 . 8 sd 0 . 4895權力規范5 . 1 sd 0 . 6223相互關系4 . 7 sd 0 . 6189 ,說明管理人員影響下屬主要依賴自身魅力,注重建立非正式的權威,這也的確是最有效和值得倡導的方式。管理人員中存在兩類被試在權力關系人格3個變量上的均值差異都達到了顯著性水平,它表明在這3個變量上明顯存在高分組與低分組。低分組被試在對下屬的影響方式上,有可能還處於一個較低的水平,有必要通過培訓對他們加以提高。
  7. Through text annotation, the findings show that : ( 1 ) it is the flexibility and diversity of learning ways in the university that lead to two different evaluated criteria to learning that caused students ' cognitive discord ; ( 2 ) the subjects avoided the conflict of the two criteria in three ways : the first was redefining the " learning " ; the second was positive attribution to poor score ; the third was involving a new cognitive factor - interest

    在對所獲文本信息進行了深入分析和詮釋后得到以下結果: ( 1 )由於大學學習方式的靈活多樣性,導致了學習效能評價中出現了內部評價標準和外部評價標準的分離,引發認知失調; ( 2 )被訪女大學生通過三種途徑協調兩種評價標準之間的矛盾:重新界定「學習」 ,引申出兩種學習觀;對較差的學習成績進行積極歸因;引入新的協調認知的因素興趣。
分享友人