curiae 中文意思是什麼
curiae
解釋
中世紀法庭-
America is also an advocator of regulation of amicus curiae in which non - behalf relevant members of trade disputes nominate. panelists and members of appellate bodies
此外，美國也提倡「法官的顧問制度」 ，即由貿易爭端的非相關利益成員方提名爭端解決程序中專家組成員或上訴機構成員的制度。 -
The first part is about the connotation of " amicus curiae " briefs and its history
「法庭之友」陳述的問題不能被無限期的擱置，最終必須在制度層面加以解決。 -
Such a response to the issue of amicus curiae in an impromptu and inconsistent manners by the dispute settlement body have triggered the hot debate among the wto members
爭端解決機構對法庭之友意見採取一案一議、非一連貫性的做法，引發了成員國之間激烈的爭論。 -
The issue of " amicus curiae " briefs has experienced a process, which is from denial to shake, then to acceptance, in the wto dispute settlement body
由於「法庭之友」及其陳述的法律地位不明確， wto爭端解決機構，尤其是上訴機構對待「法庭之友」陳述的實踐就成為值得研究的問題。 -
The contribution of ec focuses on panel establishment, implementation of recommendations and rulings, compensation and the suspension of concessions, regulation of amicus curiae and so on
歐共體把談判的重點放在了專家組的組成、建議與裁決的執行、補償與中止減讓、法庭之友制度等方面。 -
After the establishment of the world trade organization, some non - governmental organizations joined into the wto dispute settlement by submitting “ amicus curiae " briefs to wto dispute settlement agency
「法庭之友」及其陳述的出現給一直飽受缺乏透明度非議的wto爭端解決機制帶來了新鮮空氣。 -
" amicus curiae " briefs was briefly applied in the litigation system of common law countries such as britain and the united states. at present, there are fewer presentations on this issue in china
Wto爭端解決機制當中並沒有關于「法庭之友」及其陳述的規定，但「法庭之友」及其陳述卻在wto爭端解決的實踐當中頻頻出現。 -
With these questions, the article mainly discusses the theoretical basis and realistic meaning of expert legal opinion, and puts forward the suggestions to consummate it in comparing it with the amicus curiae system of the usa
帶著這些問題，本文重點探討了專家法律意見書的理論基礎和現實意義，並在和美國法院之友制度的比較評析中提出了完善我國專家法律意見書的建議。 -
If it was necessary to instruct such a counsel in a case, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the instruction to the counsel would make it clear that his role in the review committee hearing is essentially that of an amicus curiae
假如在考慮案件的特定情況后，某宗案件必須委派該大律師，署方會清楚指示該大律師其在覆核委員會聆訊中的角色本質上乃法庭之友。 -
These organizations are called amicus curiae, they have intervened many of disputes and submit the brief directly to the panel and the appellate body ; meanwhile, the panel and the appellate body either decline or accept submission or draw up special procedure for the amicus curiae brief
Wto的諸協定，特別是《關于爭端解決規則與程序的諒解》 （簡稱dsu ）中沒有關於法庭之友的規定，但是法庭之友主動向專家組、上訴機構提交意見，介入爭端解決機制已經是不爭的事實。 -
" amicus curiae " briefs and its unique value in the litigation are also gradually falling into chinese scholars ’ sight with the wto. in this thesis, there are mainly six parts, which are all concerning the discussion of " amicus curiae " briefs in the wto dispute body
各國對wto爭端解決機制當中應不應該接受「法庭之友」陳述，爭論十分激烈，承認「法庭之友」陳述在專家組階段可接受而在上訴機構階段不可接受是解決這一矛盾較好的方法。 -
The first section is the concept of amicus curiae and its evolution. amicus curiae, as the friend of the court, refers to the individuals and organization, without having direct interest in the case, petitioning to file the brief to the court and expounding their comments and views to the case for the judge ’ s reference and improving the judging capability. as for the characteristics of amicus curiae, one is that individual or organization not bearing any direct interest with the disputes and whom actively file the brief to the court
本文從法庭之友的概念、特徵和歷史沿革入手，分析三個典型案例，試圖找到法庭之友介入爭端解決機製法律依據，並對成員國對此問題的提案和觀點進行歸納，最後對爭端解決機制中的法庭之友問題提出建議:爭端解決機構應適當地行使司法解釋權，允許法庭之友意見在專家組階段提交。
分享友人