government tort 中文意思是什麼

government tort 解釋
政府侵權（行為）
  • government : n. 1. 政治；政體；政權；管理，支配。2. 政廳；〈G-〉 政府，〈英國〉內閣。3. 行政管理區域。4. 【語法】支配。5. 政治學。6. 〈美國〉 〈pl. 〉 政府證券。
  • tort : n. 【法律】侵權行為。
  1. The cause is that depending strength of government only to hit lawless proprietor and safeguard consumer ' s leigitimate rights and interests is limited, because the proprietor can constringe the action of self due to the government strike it strongly in the short - term, but government can not be persisted over a long period of time because of the restriction of resources such as funds etc. in another aspect, if encouraging consumer to safeguard the leigitimate rights and interests of self, the probability that proprietor ' s tort occurs could reduce generally, moreover it is lasting

    本文首先從靜態的角度來分析消費者權益受到損害的原因。通過分析發現，單純地依靠政府的力量來打擊不法經營者、維護消費者合法權益的作用是有限的，短期中經營者會因為政府加大打擊力度而收斂自己的行為，但政府由於受經費等資源的限制，不可能長期堅持下去。從另一個角度，如果鼓勵消費者維護自身的合法權益，則經營者侵權行為發生的概率會降低，而且具有持久性。
  2. The administrative law circles of our country have made the following greater progress mainly in research of administering the state according to law : ( 1 ) have made several obvious achievements mainly in rules of organization of the administration and public servant law research, have offered t he theoretical foundation and practiced the scheme to the reform in government organization and formulation of civil servant ' s regulations of the eighties ; ( 2 ) break through pure management mode, propose administrative legal system principle, administrative supervision and supervise the administrative theory ; ( 3 ) strengthening the research of theory to supervision administrative theory, administrative legal liability and administration relieves the theory, to relevant administration ' s controlling, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation system basic principle principle way, etc, have launched the deep discussion ; ( 4 ) research about the administrative liability for tort, encroach right and belonging to the responsibility principle, responsibility form, responsibility subject, bear responsibility way and as main administrative liability for tort administrative compensation research of issue of form, having made more achievements, " state compensation law " was just made out on this kind of sturdy and fruitful research foundation of the administrative law circles ; ( 5 ) the research field has expansion to a great extent

    我國行政法學界在依法行政的研究方面主要取得了如下較大進展： （ 1 ）在行政組織法和公務員法研究方面取得了若干明顯的成果，為80年代政府機構改革和公務員條例的制定提供了理論依據和實踐方案； （ 2 ）突破了純管理模式，提出了行政法制原則，行政監督和監督行政的理論； （ 3 ）加強了對監督行政理論、行政法律責任和行政救濟理論的研究，對有關行政監察、行政復議和行政訴訟制度的基本原理、原則、方式等，展開了深入的探討； （ 4 ）關於行政侵權責任的研究，在侵權歸責原則、責任構成、責任主體、承擔責任方式以及作為主要行政侵權責任形式的行政賠償問題的研究上，取得了較多成果， 《國家賠償法》正是在行政法學界的這種扎實且富有成效的研究基礎上制定出來的； （ 5 ）研究領域有了很大程度的拓展。主要研究領域包括行政法的基本理論，政府組織法、廉政建設、公務員法、行政立法、行政執法、行政司法、行政違法與行政責任、國家賠償、行政法制保障部門、行政管理法、行政救濟法、行政程序法等。
  3. The first is how to distinguish the liability caused by the tort affecting the. public utility facilities and the civil liability of the public undertaking. the second is the exemption of the tort affecting the public utility facilities. and the last is how to compensate if government does n ' t place the public utility facilities

    主要是關于區別公有公共設施的國家賠償責任與公用企業的民事責任的問題，關于公有公共設施設置或管理瑕疵致害的免責事由問題和關于未設置公有公共設施的國家賠償責任問題。
  4. As the government enhances its function of the public service, it appears more and more damages suits resulting from the tort affecting the public utility facilities. it ' s difficult to decide their nature is administrative indemnity or civil compensation

    近幾年來，在我國隨著政府公共服務職能的增強，出現了不少公有公共設施致害的賠償案件，其性質屬於民事賠償還是行政賠償一直難以斷定，法院在審理此類案件過程中，有按照民事賠償判決的，也有按照行政賠償判決的。
  5. Second the article discusses that the theoretical basis of these damages caused by the tort affecting the public utility facilities are the theory of dangerous liability and the theory of the public service. as the government increases the public utility facilities, it makes these damages suits becoming ordinary. in many countries governmental compensation act have include these damages suits

    文章的第二部分又論述了公有公共設施致害賠償的理論基礎是國家危險責任論和公共服務論，隨著近代政府職能增大，福利措施的增加，公共設施的設置日益普遍，雖然理論上很難將其歸屬公權力的作用，但公民接觸使用公有公共設施的情形日漸頻繁，因設施的瑕疵受損害的機率也日漸增多，目前各國的國家賠償責任，均已將公有公共設施的瑕疵損害原因包括在內。
  6. First point is about the problems that private enterprises meet in self - development, including structural conflict of their products, non - standard management, lack of talent and experience in the field of foreign trade, low technical content in products, and hardness to get needed information etc. many private enterprises adopt the behavior of pursuing benefit of short period as export with low price, serve with shoddy tort and so on, all those may disturb the export market and lash the normal trading order. the last one is the restriction factor of external operation environment. as the entrance threshold of foreign trade field is high, resonance like professional association does not play a deserved role, the export encouragement policy of government is unsuitable, the land resource has become increasingly intense, and problems still exist in formulating and implementing of p artial laws and regulations

    首先是民營企業在自身發展中遇到的問題，包括結構性矛盾突出、經營管理不規范、外貿的人才和經驗匱乏、技術水平落後、難以獲得所需信息等，不僅制約了企業自身的發展，也對正常的外貿經營秩序造成了沖擊；其次是外部經營環境的制約因素，如外貿領域的準入門檻較高、行業協會等中介組織沒有發揮應有的作用、政府的出口鼓勵措施政策不當、土地資源日益緊張、部分法律法規的制訂和實施存在問題。
  7. The government of hksar, the telecommunications authority and ofta shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential losses or damages ( including, without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits ) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use this web site, or any material contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of using this site or any such material

    香港特區政府、電訊管理局局長及電訊局不會對使用或無法使用本網頁或其中所載資料或就使用本網頁或其中任何資料所採取的任何行動或作出的決定引起直接、間接、特殊或相應而生的損失或損害（包括但不限於業務損失或溢利損失）負上法律責任。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書