judicial question 中文意思是什麼
judicial question
解釋
司法問題-
In this article, in the light of article 133 of criminal law and some newly passed judicial interpretation, the author starts with the constitution of the crime of causing traffic casualties and makes a thorough research on the question of the characterization of causi ng traffic casualties with driving non - motor - driven vehicles or without public control rules, the rationality of judicial interpretation about the joint crime of causing traffic casualties and the moral damage of the crime of causing traffic casualties, in the hope of making some benefits to the legislation and judicial interpretation in future
本文中，筆者結合刑法第一百三十三條的規定及最新通過的一些司法解釋，從交通肇事罪的犯罪構成入手，就駕駛非機動車輛肇事、在公共交通管理范圍外肇事的定性問題，有關司法解釋中關于交通肇事共同犯罪的合理性問題，交通肇事犯罪的精神損害賠償問題等進行了深入的探討，以期對今後的立法和司法解釋有所裨益。 -
For china, how to perform entirely the duty of judicial review in anti - dumping law is urgent question, in judicial circle, although there are two the supreme people ' s court ' s judicial interpretation giving the principle and the direction, both are not impeccable enough ; in juristic circle, there are not common concept accepted widely about the body of judicial review, the scope of judicial review and the standard of judicial review. in this article, author intend to offer a reference for the development and accomplishment of chinese antidumping judicial review system, combining the experiences of other members of wto with chinese current law in anti - dumping law
本文，筆者在wto司法審查制度和中國所做出的關于司法審查的承諾這一大背景下，結合世界各國在反傾銷司法審查這三方面的相關規定，以及目前我國與反傾銷司法審查有關的法律法規和理論研究成果，對反傾銷司法審查的主體、范圍和標準這三大問題做了深入和細致的研究與闡述，為中國反傾銷司法審查制度的發展與完善提供參考。 -
Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law
但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡明了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟證明中的重要意義，然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括，接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析，最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。 -
As to the question about the criminal legal object, the convicts but not the crimes became the problem that criminal judicial organization has to face up with. the traditional criminal judicature has a chroni c illness that it concerns only crimes and neglects criminals, so it can only ensure an objective external justice of same treatments to same actions and suiting punishments to crimes, but ca n ' t fully reflect the criminals " all kinds of complex subjective elements to make the application of criminal law the most appropriate crime controlling method. accordingly, the individualization of criminal law because of the focus of people ' s concern
在刑事法的對象問題上，犯罪人而非犯罪行為成為了國家刑事司法系統所要面對的課題，傳統的刑事司法存在著「見物不見人」的痼疾，因此只能保證同樣行為同樣對待、 「罪刑相適應」的客觀的、外在的公平，卻不能把犯罪人的各種復雜的主觀因素充分地反映出來，使得刑事法的運作能夠成為最佳的犯罪控制手段，因此，刑事法的個別化開始成為人們關注的焦點。 -
The prosecutor ' s proposing power in the judge ' s discretion in sentencing ( " proposing power " ) means the public prosecutor on behalf of the people ' s procuratorate based upon the facts and circumstance of the crime that the dependant commits, nature of the crime and the degree of endangering society, makes suggestion to the people ' s court regarding the criminal penalty that may be imposed on the dependant, the term of penalty, pecuniary fine and whether the probation shall be applicable ate. as a system innovation that basic people ' s procuratorate has made in the judicial practice, there are some question needed to be clarified in theory in the system of public prosecutor ' s proposing in the judge ' s discretion in sentencing
量刑建議權是指公訴人在出庭支持公訴過程中，根據被告人的犯罪事實、犯罪情節、性質和社會危害程度代表人民檢察院建議人民法院對被告人處以某一特定的刑罰、刑期、罰金以及是否應緩期執行等方面提出具體意見的權力。作為一種基層人民檢察機關在司法實踐中的制度創新，量刑建議制度在理論上存在著一些需要澄清的問題，本文在綜合各方觀點的基礎上，擬對量刑建議制度系統闡述。 -
The reform of judicial system, which was once criticized as the bourgeois ideology, is now the key element in the realization of judicial justice. the report of 16th meeting of ccp of china begins to pay attention to the question of judiciary independence
在當前的司法體制改革中，作為資產階級法律思想? ?司法獨立一度受到批判和指責，現在卻成為實現司法公正的關鍵因素之一，甚至黨的十六大報告也開始關注司法獨立的問題。 -
Having this theoretical premise, this thesis explores the question concerning to the limitation of actions applicable to voiding the contract. this thesis is divided into three parts : the introduction, the body and conclusion. the introduction first has a picture of the current situation of the theoretical study on limitation of actions for invalid contract ’ s application, and the perplexity as well as difficulties existing in the judicial practice
同時針對有體物的返還財產請求權，其應為所有物返還請求權，並且為了妥善保護給付人利益並督促權利人實現權利，以區分登記所有權與不登記所有權為標準，決定是否適用訴訟時效:在不登記所有權場合，所有物返還請求權適用訴訟時效;在登記所有權場合（包括我國法律要求在所有權轉移時也需登記的那部分動產） ，所有物返還請求權則不適用訴訟時效。 -
Although the author, who works as a judge, cannot keep up with those working for theoretic studies, she has chosen this question for discussion for the purpose of learning with an eye on the actual requirement to solve those puzzling problems in judicial practices
筆者來自於審判一線，學術水平遠不及理論工作者，但出於解決審判實踐中難點問題的實際需要，本著學習的目的選擇了這一課題。證明責任分配問題的提出，是由於案件事實真偽不明的客觀存在。 -
The question is very outstanding during the judicial pratice at present
目前在司法實踐中問題非常突出。 -
According to that, it has important role and theory value for guilty control and guilty precaution. this thesis stands in the point of the puzzled question of death caused by escape in theory and practice, and analyses some important questions of it, in order to help determining and dealing with this kind of cases rightly in judicial practice
但究竟如何界定因逃逸致人死亡的法律內涵、罪過形式、表現形式，如何區分其與不作為故意殺人罪的界限，以及針對各種情況如何定罪量刑，成為正確理解與適用這一規定的關鍵問題。 -
Hon emily lau raised a question on the chief executive s exercise of discretionary power on continued payment of pensions to civil servants or judicial officers during reappointment to public service
劉慧卿議員就行政長官酌情容許獲批予退休金的退休公務員或司法人員在再度受聘擔任公職期間繼續領取退休金的事宜提出質詢。 -
Hon emily lau raised a question on the chief executive s ( ce ) exercise of discretionary power on continued payment of pensions to civil servants or judicial officers during reappointment to public service
劉慧卿議員就行政長官酌情容許獲批予退休金的退休公務員或司法人員在再度受聘擔任公職期間繼續領取退休金的事宜提出質詢。 -
As a kind of illegal phenomenon, the insider trading endangers the long - term, healthy, steady development of security market. at present, the countries and regions all over the world have been forbidding the inside trade and taking all sorts of measui ~. with the setting - up and perfection of the security market ofour country, the inside trade violation and criminal offence have already be ~ me a phenomenon that can ’ t be ignored, question about the inside trading activity discussion of carrying on the legal structure becomes the law circles ’ focus progressively. at present, our country issue a senes of laws and regulations successively already, legislate, administration judicial authority take the corresponding mcasul " c to the inside trading activity separately. however, there are lacks of regulations about the civil liabilities of insider trading. obviously, the civil liability for tort is valid methods to protect the interests of vast interests. under this kind of background, thc strengthening of legal research about the inside trade ’ structure of security market of our country has been great, realistic meanings. this thesis is composed offour parts, in which the third and fourth parts arc the core
然而，這並不意味著我們已經找到有效規制證券市場上內幕交易的方法，我國證券市場上內幕交易民事救濟制度的缺位已是理論界和實踐界公認的事實。借鑒其他國家和地區的立法經驗，本文在論證內幕交易法律監管的正當性基礎上，指出證券市場內幕交易的民事責任制度具有不可或缺的性質。通過對證券市場內幕交易結構進行分析，嘗試明確我國內幕交易民事責任的性質及構成要件，並且著重針對內幕交易的民事責任救濟機制的訴訟主體資格、訴訟模式及損害賠償數額研究等三個方面加以論述，以期對我國內幕交易民事責任制度研究、建立和完善有所裨益。 -
It is a new question in american arbitral practice that parties contract for expanding the scope of the judicial review of arbitral awards
摘要仲裁當事人協議擴大司法審查范圍是美國仲裁實踐中的新問題。 -
Question of jurisdiction also arise regarding quasi - judicial, such as administrative agencies
準司法機構，如行政機構等也會出現管轄權問題 -
From the basic point, this text analyses deeply the coordination between the retroactivity of criminal and the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, and combine the principles on the retroactivity of criminal law has been regulated in the legislation of countries all over the world. analyzing the inherent value and the criminal ' s function reflected one by one, and has reach the rational conclusion of adopting the principle of application of the old law with the exception of a less punishment in the new law ; after the retroactivity of the legislation of criminal law in our country, throu gh the thorough analysis of the difficult point related to the retroactivity of criminal law question in practice, i put forward the scientific solution ; in the end, i analyses the retroactivity of the judicial explanation on criminal law in practice and put forward the corresponding solution
本文基於這個基點，深入分析了刑法的溯及力問題與罪刑法定原則蘊涵價值的協調問題，並結合世界各國刑法立法在溯及力問題上採用的原則，逐個剖析其內在價值和所體現的刑法機能，並得出了從舊兼從輕原則的合理結論；在對我國刑法立法溯及力問題的基本內容準確把握后，通過對司法實踐中涉及溯及力問題的難點的透徹分析，提出了科學的解決方案；最後針對實踐中常常遇到的刑法司法解釋的溯及力問題，進行了深入的法理探析，並相應的提出了解決方法。 -
Judicial fairness is the question that people pay more attention to
司法公正是大家所關注的問題。 -
To solve the question existing in our country ' s present legal system, our legal system must be reformed from following aspects : ( 1 ) reform present human affairs, the finance and the leader system, establish a judicial system which is uniform and independent in the national scope, guarantees unification of the jurisdiction and the national legal system ; ( 2 ) reform surveillance mechanism, strengthen judicature surveillance, guarantee the judicature to be fair ; ( 3 ) reform interior management system and working routine of judicial department ; ( 4 ) establish investigating system to misjudged law case
針對我國現行司法制度中存在的問題，我國司法制度改革在具體措施上還應當圍繞著以下幾個方面進行: （一）改革目前的人事、財政及領導體制，在全國范圍內建立一個統一而又獨立的司法系統，以確保司法權和國家法制的統一; （二）改革監督機制，強化司法監督，確保司法公正; （三）改革司法機關內部的管理體制和工作程序; （四）建立錯案責任追究制度。 -
In judicial practice of civil procedure, a tough question was produced as whether the traditional rules of territorial jurisdiction for infringements apply to the cyberspace
在民事訴訟實踐中，我們面臨的首要問題就是：指導傳統侵權之訴的地域管轄規則在網路侵權案中是否仍然適用 -
Therefore, how to the effective control and strike against the crime, and how to construct the transnational cooperation mechanism, is the core of the criminal legislation and judicature of all central asia countries and our china. from the angle of the international criminal law, this thesis begins with the general theories of the crime, then analyses and studies on the present situation, reason, developing tendency, typical type of the crime in central asia, and pays more attention to the practice and the question of legislation and judicial of the crime of the all countries in central asia and our china. at last gives some advices towards how to strike against the transnational organized crime in the central asia
本文以國際刑法學為視角，從跨國有組織犯罪的一般理論入手，結合社會學、犯罪學、經濟學的相關知識，深入研究了中亞跨國有組織犯罪的現狀、特點、成因和典型類型，客觀分析了中亞各國和我國跨國有組織犯罪的立法和司法現狀及存在的問題，最後對如何打擊、控制和預防中亞跨國有組織犯罪提出自己一些不成熟的對策、建議，筆者從跨國合作和我國國內兩個層面著手，從立法和司法兩個方面出發，既要加強國家間和地區間的立法協調和司法合作，又要完善國內的刑事立法和司法制度。
分享友人