jus in rem 中文意思是什麼
jus in rem
解釋
對物權利-
A new research on jus in rem
一種法與經濟學分析的思路 -
The nature of jus ad rem is one controlling and exclusive right, so the changing of jus ad rem will greatly influence the interests of a third party, which is the embodiment of the market order, and the normal economic order of the entire society is composed of many third parties, therefore, it is necessary to protect the interests of the third party in the changing of jus ad rem
物權變動是指物權的設立、移轉、變更、消滅。由於物權的本質為支配性、排他性權利，所以物權變動不僅對物權變動當事人的利益影響重大，而且與物權變動當事人以外的第三人的利益息息相關。而第三人的利益實際上正是市場交易秩序的化身，社會整體的正常經濟秩序就是由一個個第三人連接起來的。 -
In the general provisions of the draft of the civil code presided by the scholars, some stipulate clearly the system of the claim of intellectual property, the others just explain that the claim of jus ad rem can be apply to intellectual property in the explanation of the draft ; as for the frame of intellectual property law written by the specialist in intellectual property law, there is no concept of this type of claim. the weakness in the cognition of the claim of intellectual property in theory has resulted in the confusing situation in legislation and juridical practice. the weakness is no good to bring the role of the protection of the claim of intellectual property into play either
由於絕對權保護方法在理論研究上相對滯后，加之我國獨特的民事責任體系造成侵權行為法體系的混亂，使得我國現行民法上沒有確立知識產權請求權制度。目前，雖然已有學者認識到知識產權請求權的存在，但總體上這種認識是不全面、不系統和不統一的。這種理論認識上的缺位，勢必會導致立法和司法實踐過程中的混亂狀態，不利於發揮知識產權請求權對其基礎權利的保護作用。 -
Based on the comparison of these two patterns, the author argues that the pattern of constituting effect should be adopted in china ' s legislation of jus ad rem concerning the effect of publicity
為了兼顧對原權利人利益的保護，對公信力須以一定的參數來加以調控，該參數就是第三人的善意。 -
As for the protection of the interests of the third party in the changing of jus ad rem, there are three examples of legislation, that is, the system of acquisition with good of acquisition with good faith, abstrakte. natur and the principle of publicity and absolute effect
因此，必須保護物權變動中第三人的利益。就物權變動中第三人的保護問題，主要有三種立法體例：善意取得制度、物權行為無因性理論、公示公信原則。 -
Thirdly, the author goes on the discussion of the nature of international factoring contract. based on the comparison of three opinions, that is, the theory of abstract quasi - jus ad rem contract, the theory of causal contract of purchase and the theory of contract, the author deems the theory of causal contract of purchase the most reasonable, however, there is not the concept of cause in china ' s contract law, so the author defines its nature as one contract of purchase
最後，簡要介紹了學界中存在的有關國際保理協議法律性質的三種學說，即無因準物權合同說、要因買賣合同說和合同說，並對這三種學說進行比較分析，認為要因買賣合同說最具合理性，但由於我國並未有「要因」這一概念，所以將國際保理協議的性質界定為買賣合同。 -
This thesis is composed of five parts, totaling 30, 000 words : part i focuses on the necessity of protecting the interests of the third party in the changing of jus ad rem. the author briefly introduces several basic categories of the changing of jus ad rem, and then goes on discussing the nature of the third party involved in the changing of jus ad rem
首先概要介紹了物權變動的幾個基本范疇，接著對物權變動中所涉及的第三人進行了定性：物權變動中所涉及的第三人，一般指不參與當事人的法律關系，但是與當事人的法律關系的結果有密切利害關系的一切人。 -
In the end the author has a review of the history of three specific systems concerning the protection of the interests of the third party and d ws the conclusion of the value - orientation of the changing of jus ad rem in contemporary era, that is, the static safety of estates should be paid attention during the protection of the transaction safety
同出賣人相比，第三人實際上是市場交易秩序整體的化身，故保護第三人的利益就是保護交易安全。本部分最後從民法發展史的角度考察了專門保護第三人利益的三大具體制度的誕生歷程，並總結出了當代物權變動的價值取向，即在保障交易安全的同時，兼顧財產的靜態安全。 -
Making mortgage as a core, basing on the jurisprudence of public jus in rem, considering related social policy, depending on circumstances of china ' s present legal system, in contact with related foreign legislations, the paper makes an analysis on the order among multiple mortgages, between mortgage and the other priority rights as they coexist
本文以抵押權為軸心，以物權公示法理和基於社會政策的考慮為線索，依託我國現行法制背景，結合國外相關立法，分析了抵押權與抵押權並存時、抵押權與其他擔保物權並存時、以及抵押權與相關優先權並存時的順位關系。
分享友人