justice as fairness 中文意思是什麼
justice as fairness
解釋
公平式的公正-
Thirdly, in 1996, the fashion of courtroom judgment has been changed aimed at fairness, but the prepare system matching to deraignment judgment has n ' t been established. fourthly, in the p ractice of justice, judge always use prosecuting roll as recite judgment in disguised form
第三， 1996年刑訴法在以公正為目標調整庭審方式的同時，卻沒有建立與抗辨式庭審相配套的庭前準備制度。 -
In june 2006, the repatriation of lai chang xing was again blocked, this case reflects three major legal impediments as china extraditing economic criminals in exile, i. e. the absence of extradition treaty, the issue of capital punishment, and the question on the fairness of china ' s justice system
摘要2006年6月，賴昌星遣返再次遇阻，此案折射出我國引渡外逃經濟罪犯存在三大主要法律障礙：引渡條約的缺位；死刑問題；司法公正問題。 -
Social justice is defined as the reasonable and equal distribution among all the members of the society of the social interests with regard to politics, economy and other respects ; it implies equality rights, and opportunity equitableness in terms of distribution and fairness in terms of judicature
社會公平是指社會的政治利益、經濟利益和其他利益在全體社會成員之間合理而平等的分配，它意味著權利的平等、分配的合理、機會的均等和司法的公正。 -
Rawls is the most important western political philosopher in the twentieth century. his theory of justice as fairness has been regarded by western thinkers as the quintessence which has grand system and exquisite thought
羅爾斯是20世紀西方最重要的政治哲學家，其作為公平的正義理論已成為西方思想界體大思精的典範。 -
This paper will address this issue. by focusing on the influence on rawls from kantian theory, i argue that justice as fairness does bear some kantian features, and that rawls tries to construct what kant starts with : the unconditional authority
論點是，羅爾斯的理論援用康德哲學中的重要的建構論，希望用來產生一個具有像無上命令般的論證基礎，以便解決各種有關公正的基本原則之間的沖突。 -
In the book political liberalism and justice as fairness ? ? a restatement, john rawls gives a new argumentation of the two principles of justice. it mainly embodies that john rawls demonstrates his conception of justice as political conception of justice. political conception of justice has three features : firstly, its theme is the basic structure of society ; secondly, it is the essential part of the constitutional democratic society ; thirdly, its content is expressed in the basic idea of a democratic society ’ s public political culture
為達此目的，他做了以下努力:首先，把正義觀念嚴格限定為政治正義觀念;其次，採取契約論方法，藉助原初狀態和無知之幕的理論預設，同時處處比照于功利主義原則，對兩個正義原則是最合適的政治正義原則進行論證，並考察其現實性;最後，討論兩個正義原則的應用問題，以表明它與人們的正義信念相符。 -
Rawls ' considers original position to be a significant part of the overall argument for " justice as fairness ", and imposes three suppositions and qualifications on original position : the information in a veil of ignorance, self - interested and rational parties in the original position and conditions of the objects of choice
摘要羅爾斯把原初狀態作為「正義即公平」的主要論證要素，對原初狀態作了三方面的限制性假設：信息的假設，無知之幕；原初狀態各方的假設，相互冷淡而又具有理性；選擇對象的限制條件的假設。 -
As mentioned above, it is obvious that we are not supposed to be single - faceted in determining which is better in the long run of taking law into effect to protect social justice and achieve judicial fairness
綜上所述不難看出，在發揮法的作用，維護社會正義和實現司法公正的總體過程中，我們不能片面地斷定孰優孰劣。 -
The precondition of studying the distribution of burden of proof in civil lawsuit is to correctly set theoretical definitions for burden of proof as well as the object of burden of proof. going through various viewpoints upon the distribution of burden of proof, they, guided by the substantive law and the principle of justice and fairness, have respective limitations, they strive for the predictability and stability of law, but unavoidably face the problem of little flexibility, which might make the results not so fair, the substantive standards highlight a great flexibility, but might cause careless judge due to the uncertainty of standards
綜觀證明責任分配諸說，雖均以符合實體法宗旨與公平正義原則為指導思想，但各有其局限，形式性標準致力於實現法的可預測性與穩定性，但卻不可避免地存在靈活性不足的問題，可能使證明責任負擔的結果有欠公平，實質性標準實現了靈活性的長處，卻又存在因標準不確定導致法官恣意裁判危及正義的可能。 -
As a specialized non - profit organization engaged in social welfare, chinese welfare third sector ( cwts ), regards rescuing and helping the difficulties and social welfare as it ' s own duty, works for the welfare of social disadvantaged groups conscientiously, and offers effective help for realizing the social fairness, justice and reform in government organizations
摘要中國福利性第三部門（ cwts ） ，作為專業化的從事社會福利工作的非營利性機構，視救困濟難、社會福利為己任，切實為社會弱勢群體謀福利，為實現社會公平公正和政府機構改革提供了有效的幫助。 -
This means the basic court can be regarded as the base on which people ' s judicial system in china forms, the premise of implementing the strategy of ruling by law, the frontier in realization of civilian ' s legal rights and interests, and as the cornerstone on which substantial social justice and fairness fullfill
在此意義上，可以認為基層法院是我國人民司法體制的基礎，是推進依法治國方略的前提，是實現公民合法權益的前沿，進而也是保障全社會實現公平和正義的基石。 -
His theory of " justice as fairness " just come down in one continuous line from kant ' s constructivism ethics
他的「正義即公平」理論和康德的建構主義倫理學一脈相承。 -
This thesis thinks that john rawls " thought of " justice as fairness " experienced a shift from " moral constructivism " to " political constructivism "
文章認為，羅爾斯的「公平正義」思想發生了從「道德建構主義」向「政治建構主義」的立場轉換。 -
The whole paper consists six chapters. chapter. foundations and methods from the whole content and basic structure in a theory of justice, rawls ’ s theory of justice is the theoretical extension of justice as fairness. this paper will explore and analyze the conception of justice as fairness from the different levels of value - institution - policy in distributive and institutional and policy dimensions
眾所周知，羅爾斯的《正義論》是在早期發表的論文的基礎上完善整理而成的，這一時期的著作反映了當時美國政治道德哲學的發展脈絡，為《正義論》的最終成形奠定了理論和方法上的知識準備。 -
This thesis tries to probe into john rawls " thought of " justice as fairness " by the way of the explanation and the standpoints of " moral constructivism " and " political constructivism ", expecting to clear its theoretic background, to review its relations with kant ' s ethics, to dredge the intrinsic clue of its changes from " kantian moral constructivism " to " political constructivism ", and finally to anatomize its success and failure of its changing standpoints, through which to outline the changing process of john rawls " thought
本文試圖從「道德建構主義」與「政治建構主義」的解釋方式和立場這一角度探討羅爾斯的「公平正義」思想，力求廓清其理論背景，考察其與康德倫理學的關聯承續，疏通其從康德式「道德建構主義」走向「政治建構主義」的內在理路，剖析其立場轉換的得失，以期對羅爾斯「公平正義」思想的變化脈絡作?鳥瞰式的粗筆勾勒。 -
Although there exist consistency and variability between copyright protection in network times and that in traditional printing times, copyright protection in both times share the same theoretical origin. jurisprudence emphasizes much on the principle of " fairness and justice ", which embodies itself as " interests balance " in copyright protection, that is, jurisprudence aims to solve interests clashes between the author and the general public
網路時代的版權保護與傳統的版權保護之間既有很大的繼承性，又有較大的變異性，但卻都有著共同的理論淵源：法哲學十分強調「公平正義」原則，它在版權保護中的體現就是「利益平衡」 ，即不斷解決作者利益與社會公共利益之間的摩擦。
分享友人