liability without fault 中文意思是什麼
liability without fault
解釋
無過失責任無過錯責任-
When dealing with the subjective - guilt of environmental crime, common - law countries follow the principle that " et actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea and liability without fault is adopted by individual law, not regarded as universal principle
以英國和美國為代表的英美法系在環境犯罪的主觀罪過上，一般都遵循「無罪過即無刑罰」的原則，無過失責任只規定在個別法規中，並沒有作為普遍的歸責原則。 -
Now that the institution of the capacity for civil liability is the logic premise that affirms a fault, and a doer can not be affirmed to be in fault without the recognizing ability, the ability behoove to be the criterion for judging whether someone own the capacity for civil liability
既然責任能力是認定過錯的前提，只有在行為人於行為時有識別能力才可能形成過錯，那麼行為人的具體識別能力理應成為責任能力的判斷標準。 -
This form of liability is called “ liability without fault ”. the foundation of “ liability without fault ” has resolved many problems, but it also has brought many problems. “ fault ” and “ without fault ” are two concepts which have opposite meanings, then why can they exist in one system of law
由於這類損害事故的發生往往是行為人難以預料、難以控制的，因而可以說超出了行為人理性所能及的范圍，究其本質可以說是對現代社會特殊風險的分散。 -
Liability with fault liability without fault
無過失賠償責任 -
Legality crisis of tort law - jurisprudence thought from liability for wrongs to liability without fault
從過錯責任到無過錯責任變化的法理學思考 -
In this thesis, the author mainly investigates the application of liability without fault principle and causation of epidemic disease in this kind of crime
對破壞環境資源保護罪在刑事責任上應採用無過錯責任原則，在處罰上擴大罰金刑和非刑罰措施，在司法認定該罪因果關繫上應采納疫學的因果關系。 -
Liability without fault
無過失責任 -
Thirdly, our economic construction will be destroyed if liability without fault is put into use. fourthly, the aim of lawsuit is to pursue justice instead of efficient lawsuit
第四，訴訟的根本價值在於追求公正，以訴訟效率為名，實行無過失責任，實際上是本末倒置。 -
It is putting a cart before a horse to make liability without fault come into force. in the end, the thesis points out we should not neglect the justice of law, but determine the subjective guilt of environmental crime scientifically
總之，從我國目前的立法和社會發展狀況以及刑罰作用的局限性和法律的公平追求等原因，決定在我國環境犯罪中不宜適用無過失責任。 -
Scholars have different opinions on the application of liability without fault. this thesis, combining some scholars ' ideas with the legislation of subjective guilt about environmental crime in continental law system, analyses the subjective guilt of environmental crime
本文結合國內外學者的一些觀點及大陸法系和英美法系環境犯罪主觀罪過的立法和實務，對環境犯罪的主觀罪過問題進行了分析和研究。 -
In this article, the author poses disadvantages of chinese doctrines of liability fixation in civil liability of environmental pollution and suggests perfecting principles of liability without fault ; in the light of chinese increasingly serious environmental pollution, the author raises to draft " prevention and cure act in public hazards ", and clearly provides the shift of onus of proof and presumption principles of causality
指出我國環境污染民事責任歸責原則的弊端，建議完善無過失責任原則。針對我國日益嚴重的環境污染問題，提出制定《公害防治法》 ，明確規定舉證責任轉移和因果關系推定原則。 -
These problems are very important in discussing “ liability without fault ”. this paper is written centering on these problems. we hope it will offer some help to the research of “ liability without fault ”
危險責任就是在這樣的社會背景下產生的，可以說它的產生在某種意義上體現了社會和法律發展的必然，因而有其內在的合理性。 -
It should be separated the special traffic accident from the ordinary one in applying the doctrine of liability fixation on damages for traffic accident, in the special cases, principle of liability without fault needs to be adopted ; in the ordinary cases, principle of liability for wrongs needs to be done. so, we should emphasize the protection of the law on the victims of the highly dangerous work
對于道路交通事故損害賠償責任的歸責原則的適用，應區分特殊道路交通事故與一般道路交通事故，對于特殊道路交通侵權行為適用無過錯責任原則，對於一般道路交通侵權行為適用過錯責任原則，強化對高度危險作業受害者的法律保護。
分享友人