lomborg 中文意思是什麼

lomborg 解釋
隆堡
  1. Lomborg is being disingenuous when he protests that our authors did not even mention half his book

    隆伯格抗議我們的評論者對他的書連一半都沒討論到,其實不高明。
  2. When lomborg restates the number of lost species as a percentage of total species, is he simply showing the true size of the problem or is he perhaps also trying to trivialize it

    隆伯格一再地以比例來談滅絕物種的數量,他只是想說明問題的規模呢,或者是大事化小、小事化無的手法呢?
  3. Environmental scientists are all in favor of setting priorities for action ; lomborg pretends otherwise because he disagrees with the priorities they set

    環境科學家都支持設定行動的優先順序;隆伯格指鹿為馬,只不過因為他反對別人訂定的順序。
  4. Lomborg and the economist may call them “ weak on substance, ” but our pieces echo identical criticisms that have been made in reviews published by nature, science, american scientist, and a wide variety of other scientific sources ? not venues where insubstantial criticisms would hold up

    隆伯格與《經濟學人》或許會說這些駁斥意見缺乏實質,但是《自然》 、 《科學》 、 《美國科學家》 ,以及其他一大堆各式各樣科學刊物所刊出的書評,都與我們的意見相呼應;如非有憑有據的評論,那些媒體可不會隨便刊登的。
  5. The answer is neither, because numbers must be understood in context ; lomborg creates a context for belittling extinction problems

    然而,隆伯格所提供的背景脈絡,低估物種滅絕問題的嚴重性。
  6. As in his book, lomborg repeats that the kyoto protocol would postpone global warming for only six years

    隆伯格在書里反覆指出,京都議定書只能使全球暖化延緩六年。
  7. And by sowing distrust of the environmental science community with his rhetoric, lomborg has done a severe disservice not only to those scientists but also to the public he has misinformed

    他以花言巧語挑撥大眾對環境科學社群的信任,不只嚴重傷害到科學家,社會大眾因他的錯誤訊息也得不到好處。
分享友人