other lawful right 中文意思是什麼
other lawful right
解釋
其他合法權益-
Article 2 if a state organ or a member of its personnel, when exercising functions and powers in violation of the law, infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of a citizen, legal person or other organization and causes damages the aggrieved person shall have the right to recover damages from the state in accordance with this law
第二條國家機關和國家機關工作人員違法行使職權侵犯公民、法人和其他組織的合法權益造成損害的，受害人有依照本法取得國家賠償的權利。 -
Where an adopter fails to perform the duty of rearing the adoptee or commits maltreatment, abandonment, or other acts of encroachment upon the lawful rights of the minor adopted child, the person having placed out the child for adoption shall have the right to demand termination of the adoptive relationship
收養人不履行撫養義務，有虐待、遺棄等侵害未成年養子女合法權益行為的，送養人有權要求解除養父母與養子女間的收養關系。 -
Article 7 one shall, when acquiring or exercising a real right, comply with the law, respect social morals and may not infringe upon the public interests or the lawful rights and interests of any other person
第七條物權的取得和行使，應當遵守法律，尊重社會公德，不得損害公共利益和他人合法權益。 -
Article 65 when the bearer cannot provide proof of refusal to accept or pay the bill or a statement noting reasons for non - payment or any other lawful proof within the prescribed period ， he shall lose the right of recourse against his prior parties
第六十五條持票人不能出示拒絕證明、退票理由書或者未按照規定期限提供其他合法證明的，喪失對其前手的追索權。 -
Therefore, the basic theory of the anti - monopoly law is that the intellectual property right is a lawful monopoly right ; the abuse of it should be prohibited. thus the relation between the two is complicated for in some cases they are identical but in other cases they are in conflict with each other
在已有的反壟斷法論著中，普遍將知識產權作為反壟斷法的適用除外；而在知識產權的論著中也突出強調知識產權的獨占性即壟斷性，基本不涉及反壟斷的問題。 -
Article 65 a holder who is unable to present proof of dishonor, a statement on reasons for dishonor or other lawful evidence within the prescribed period of time loses the right of recourse against his prior parties
第六十五條持票人不能出示拒絕證明、退票理由書或者未按照規定期限提供其他合法證明的，喪失對其前手的追索權。 -
From then on, states no longer have any right of self - defense other than that stipulated in article 51 of the un charter, such as the right of anticipatory self - defense, even though it may be lawful under customary international law before the un charter was adopted
預先自衛，即對緊迫的攻擊危險進行自衛在憲章制訂之前是合法的，但是由於其不符合憲章第51條的規定和當代國際法最大限度禁止單邊使用武力的發展方向，在實踐中也沒有得到各國的普遍支持因而不符合當代國際法。 -
Article 13. the state protects the right of citizens to own lawfully earned income, savings, houses and other lawful property
第十三條國家保護公民的合法的收入儲蓄房屋和其他合法財產的所有權。
分享友人