real right law 中文意思是什麼
real right law
解釋
物權法-
Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition
關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較，主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用，以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用，指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系，在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中，不當得利請求權處于輔助地位，在適用中多受限制；在以物權行為無因性原則為特徵的立法例中，不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性，在實務上功能突出，成為救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。 -
In our future real right law, there should be some limitations to the open objects, hut nor the open contents in the property register of immovables ; lawsuit time limit should not he applied to return protoplast right of applicant ; we had better constitute positive prescription system ; powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right, but the transferee is well - meaning ; there should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing ; we should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open ; there should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling tern ; of primary creditor ' s rights is over, except that mortgager is not the debtor ; when the debtor do not refund the debt, the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly, but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty
摘要我國未來物權法，對于不動產登記簿的開放對象應當有所限制，但對于開放內容不應有所限制；物權人的返還原物請求權不應當適用訴訟時效；應當建立取得時效制度，並應區分一般動產、準不動產、未登記不動產而規定不同的成立條件；在動產的轉讓人為無權處分而受讓人為善意的情況下，轉讓人與受讓人之間的合同是否有效不應當以「無權處分」為條件，只有在轉讓合同無效的情形下，受讓人取得標的物的所有權才是依善意取得制度的取得，此時的取得是原始取得；在共同共有的情形下，原則上處分共有物應當經共有人全體一致同意，但應容有若干例外；不應當規定居住權；動產抵押的公示方式問題無法徹底解決，如果規定動產抵押，應當實行登記要件主義，適于烙印、打刻或貼標簽的動產，應當採取烙印、打刻或貼標簽的方式，其他無法解決公示方式的動產應當禁止抵押；主債權履行期屆滿后，抵押權人行使抵押權，原則上不應當有一個時間限制，但抵押人非為債務人時可容有例外；在債務人不償債時，抵押權人不能直接讓抵押人交出抵押物，實現抵押權，但可以持抵押權登記簿副本直接申請法院拍賣抵押物。 -
The second part estimated this system from two angles, i. e. the function of the security protection of general dealing and the function of perspicuity of code structure system, meanwhile, reviewed the methodology of high abstract and technology of the system. the third part compared the non - reason of real right action theory with goodwill obtaining and the system of improper benefiting in civil law. it compared leitmotif, scope of application and functional mechanism between the non - reason of real right action theory and the system of improper benefiting
指出物權行為無因性與善意取得制度是兩種獨立的制度，並從兩者的主旨、適用范圍、與作用機理方面進行比較，指出兩種理論保護交易安全的主旨相同，物權行為無因性理論在適用范圍上較善意取得制度更廣泛些，善意取得制度的適用范圍較物權物因性理論則更具有彈性。 -
About the superior role of the possessory right in modern real right law
論佔有制度在現代物權法中的優越地位 -
Predial servitude, a traditional usufructuary right, comes from roman law and is now widely accepted by countries of continental law system. servitude play an important role in the development of roman. however, chinese present civil law has no relating provision concerning the predial servitude. now the law relating to rights over things is on the way. many people pay attention to establishing the predial servitude system. this paper just want to make some advice to the draft of real right law from view of the development of the prediral servitude. the whole paper consists of four parts : paragraph one gives an introduction to the definition and characteristics of the predial servitude
大陸法系大多數國家都先後繼承了地役權這一種古老的用益物權制度。以羅馬農牧業經濟為基礎建立的地役權制度在社會經濟的巨大變遷中也不斷演化，以適應社會經濟發展的要求。雖然我國現行法律中卻沒有地役權的相關規定，但是即將出臺的物權法卻設專章對地役權制度進行規定，如何更好的設計地役權制度，引起眾多人的關注。 -
The fishery right system in china ' s real right law
論中國物權法中的漁業權制度 -
Good at being engaged in the market main body law relying mainly on company law, marketing law relying mainly on contract law, legal business and criminal agent, business of pleading such as intellectual property right law and trademark law, real estate law and building law, investment immigrant
擅長從事以公司法為主的市場主體法、以合同法為主的市場交易法、知識產權法和商標法、房地產法和建築法、投資移民等法律業務以及刑事代理、辯護業務。 -
While this method is changed by the draft of real right law, which unifies the publication of chattel mortgage into writing
《物權法草案》對此進行了一定的修改，把動產抵押公示方式統一為書面成立? ?登記對抗主義。 -
Clause 9 where as set forth in paragraph 2 of article 44 of the contract law, the relevant law or administration regulation provides that the effectiveness of a certain contract is subject to completion of the relevant approval procedure, or the relevant approval and registration procedures, if before completion of court debate by the parties in the trial of first instance, the parties still fail to carry out the relevant approval procedure, or approval and registration procedures, as the case may be, the people ' s court shall rule that the contract has not yet taken effect ; if the relevant law or administration regulation requires that a certain contract be registered without subjecting its effectiveness to such registration, then failure to effect registration shall not impair the effectiveness of the contract, provided that such failure constitutes an impediment to the conveyance of title to, or such other real right in, the subject matter of the contract
第九條依照合同法第四十四條第二款的規定，法律、行政法規規定合同應當辦理批準手續，或者辦理批準、登記等手續才生效，在一審法庭辯論終結前當事人仍未辦理批準手續的，或者仍未辦理批準、登記等手續的，人民法院應當認定該合同未生效；法律、行政法規規定合同應當辦理登記手續，但未規定登記後生效的，當事人未辦理登記手續不影響合同的效力，合同標的物所有權及其他物權不能轉移。 -
With regard to the theory of alteration of real right, the author firstly traces back to some theory on the alteration of real right in roman law and germanic law, and then tells us three theoretical patterns of alteration of real right based on the juristic acts chosen by the continental law family, finally gives us two types of construction patterns of the alteration of real right. part ii relates to the public summons of personal property right
對於物權變動理論，筆者首先追溯羅馬法和日耳曼法上有關物權變動的一些理論；接著介紹了現代大陸法系各國各自所採用的基於法律行為的物權變動的理論模式，主要有三種模式：債權意思主義、物權形式主義、債權形式主義；最後擺出了物權變動理論構建的兩種方式：以物權行為為核心的物權變動理論、以公示公信為核心的物權變動理論。 -
Finally, the author analyzes a few arguments of the theory of juristic act of real right most favored and points out the faults of them and holds that mancipatio and cessio injure in roman law or gewere in germanic law can be regarded as the embryo at most of the theory of juristic act of real right because there exists a great or even substantive distance between the above forms and the juristic act of real right as a product of modem law, the juristic act of real right acquires no complete form in ancient law systems
最後，基於前述的探討，筆者分析了目前學界流行的關於物權行為起源的幾個論斷，明確指出了其疏漏所在，認為羅馬法上曼兮帕蓄、擬訴棄權和日耳曼法上物權移轉的方式最多只能稱為物權行為的肇端或雛形，離我們現在理解的「物權行為」尚有較大的甚或實質性的距離，物權行為是近代法的產物，在古代法律制度中沒有完整的形態。 -
Theory of juristic act of real right and construction of the civil law system
物權行為理論與民法制度構造 -
Then, the author shows us the significance of distinguishing the substantial object and formal object of security rights. chapter four of the article discusses the influence of the review of the security rights ’ object on the definition of “ thing ( sache ) ” and “ the object of thing ” in real right law
然後筆者論述了區分擔保物權實質客體和形式客體的意義:旨在更好的掌握所有權以外的其他權利作為擔保物權客體的情形、區分權利載體和權利客體、區分物上的所有權和使用權、期待權等擔保物權客體形態。 -
Under the circumstances of reviewing definition of privilege, i put forward the definition of privilege from the point of view of legal law real right for security, analyze the foundation of privilege mechanism and legislation, explore some issues of legal property of privilege with great disputation and review the privilege origin and its evolution in overseas legal mechanism
本章在評析各種學說對優先權所作定義的基礎上，從法定擔保物權的角度提出了優先權的概念。分析了優先權制度的理論和立法基礎，對國內外爭議較大的優先權的法律性質問題作了深入的探討，並考察了優先權的起源及其在國外法制中的沿革。 -
Chapter 5, the thesis analysis law kind of asset transfer in asset securitization. transfers creditor ' s right is different from real right property. transfers creditor ' s rights and real right property same alike, but have the very big difference on the degree that rights realizes of, analysis asset transfer ' s force adeffect that applied current law of our country
論文將投資者合法權益的保護列為資產證券化監管的核心，對于監管主體如何監管資產證券化的全過程進行了分析，監管不應是泛泛而談的，要從資產證券化本身的特點出發，對最有可能導致投資者利益受損的環節進行了如何監管的分析。 -
The former ignores the autonomy space of the real right law as civil law while seeking to insure the safety of real right transactions
公示生效主義在追求物權變動的安全價值之時，泯滅了物權法作為私法的自治空間。 -
On the understanding of real right law
如何理解物權法 -
Three problems of ' land contract amp; amp; management rights ' against real right law
物權法視角中的三大問題 -
On the arbitrariness of real right law and its influences on the application of object right law
英美法系司法審查權的啟示 -
As it can play the function of protecting the trade security, promoting property circulating and steadying social economic order objectively, the bona fide acquisition is an important legal system in the real right law of modern civil law
善意取得制度是現代民法物權法中的一項重要的法律制度，在客觀上起到了保護交易安全、促進財產流轉、穩定社會經濟秩序的作用。
分享友人