rule of evidence 中文意思是什麼
rule of evidence
解釋
證據法規則-
Research on rule of evidence for administrative adjudication
行政裁決證據規則初論 -
The localization of the electronic evidence and development of the rule of hearsay evidence
電子證據的定位與傳聞證據規則的發展 -
Part iiilegal issues upon the reform of toll and tax in countryside this part is concentrated to show six problems that the reform of toll and tax in countryside is to be up against and is to be peremptorily settled as following : the first one, in the confirming of agricultural tax, it is very difficult to protect the farmer ' s rights fairly because of unscientific of the evidence at assessment, highly of tax rate, and the absence of law and statute correlatively ; the second one, on the tax levying, there lack of legal systems that is to supervise and run, especially lack of law and statute which lead to collect agricultural special tax canonically ; the third one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside extrudes unbalance burden among farmers and countries, and lead to unevenly between subject of tax payment, which breaches the legal rule of balanceable tax ; the fourth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside faces the danger that farmers " burden tends to rebound because of weakly carry through legal rule on tax statutory and absent of law and statute correlatively ; the fifth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside affects the finance and revenue - expenditure auditing of the grass roots and father affects the grass roots to raise fee upon public construction and education, as a result, there ' s more charge that is out of law, the monocracy of grass roots " finance ought to be carry out ; the sixth one, legal measures connect with the reform of toll and tax in countryside in dire need of to be built, which mainly conclude legal system that adjust country social security, country compulsory education and country debt
第三部分? ?農村稅費改革的法律課題集中展示了農村稅費改革所面臨且亟待解決的六大法律問題。即：其一，在確定農業稅上，計稅依據不科學、稅率偏高、相關法律規范缺失，無法平等保護農民的合法權益；其二，在農村稅收的徵收上，缺乏行之有效的法律監督和運行機制，尤其是農業特產稅的徵收缺乏保障據實徵收的法律規范;其三，稅費改革凸顯農民之間、農村之間的負擔不均，使納稅主體的權利義務失衡，有悖稅負均衡的法律原則;其四，由於稅收法定主義沒有得到有效貫徹，規制農民負擔反彈方面的法律法規缺位，致使農村稅費改革潛伏著農民負擔反彈的風險;其五，稅費改革影響基層組織的財政收支，進而影響鄉村公益事業建設及教育經費的籌措，引發稅外亂收費沉渣泛起，基層財政體製法治化勢在必行;其六，與稅費改革相關的配套法律措施巫待構建，主要是農村社會保障法律體系、鄉村義務教育和鄉村債務疏導的法律支撐魚待構建與完善。第四部分一一農村稅費改革與相關法律制度的構建基於上一部分提出的法律問題，力圖構築農村稅費改革的法律框架並提出相應對策。 -
Rule of corroboration is an important rule in system of evidence, which is a stipulation that definitely provable value of kinds of evidence
補強證據規則是證據制度中的一項重要規則，是法律對幾類言詞證據明確限制其證明力的法則。 -
Chapter one : introduction the author discuses the different definitions of the exclusionary rules, the background of its establishment ( at the early stage there was only the exclusionary rule on evidence obtained with the means violating the 4th amendment of the us constitution ), studies the functions of different branches of the american government in establishing and implementing the rules. finally, the author analyses the connection between the rules and adversary model of criminal justice system
首先探討了對非法證據排除規則若干概念的理解；然後考察了產生非法證據排除規則歷史的背景；再闡述了美國政府各部門在非法證據排除規則中的作用；最後分析了非法證據排除規則與對抗制的訴訟模式之關系和美國刑事司法中非法證據排除規則的局限性。 -
On the exclusive rule of illegal evidence in civil litigation
淺議民事非法證據排除規則 -
The definition of evidence rule of criminal suit is that the evidences are the mark, image, etcs of the case the judicial authority approved to prove the truth in the course of criminal suit
本文認為刑事訴訟證據是指在刑事訴訟過程中，由司法機關認可的能夠證明案情的物品、痕跡、映象等。 -
On the value of exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence
非法證據排除規則價值論綱 -
On the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence in civil procedure
民事訴訟中的非法證據排除規則 -
On theoretical base of the exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence
論非法證據排除規則的理論基礎 -
A preliminary study of exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence in criminal procedure
試論刑事訴訟中的非法證據排除規則 -
Comparative research upon the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence between canada and australia
澳大利亞非法證據排除規則的比較研究 -
When putting to the proof and inquiring about the proof, the litigant sh ould foll ow the legal procedure, and judges must authenticate the evidence by the rule of evidence presentation
舉證和質證應按照法律規定的程序進行，並由法官運用證據規則對證據作出正確認證。 -
This dissertation, through discussing respectively and researching by comparative method as to the compensation for damages for breach of a contract and for the infringement arising from road traffic accident which is related to serve contract, raises that, there exist mutual part and difference in the scope of damages, the principle of the fixation of liability, the proof of evidence, the rule of the counteraction between faults, the undertaking of the third party for the fault liability, the dealing of the free - rider with good - faith, as to the contract law and tort law in china
筆者在論文中，通過對具有服務合同關系的道路交通事故的違約損害賠償、侵權損害賠償的分別闡述和比較研究，說明了我國合同法和侵權行為法這兩種法律規范在賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任、過失相抵規則適用、第三人過錯責任承擔、好意同乘者的處理等方面，既有相同之處，也存在諸多差異。 -
On account of the circumstances, this article attempts to study the system of burden of proof and the principle of its allocation in the collision actions, and then, based on the character of legal system in china and theories of maritime judgement, it tries to analyse the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea, 1972, dig out some problems and put forward some idio - points of view. in the last section of this thesis, the author analyses and inquires into how to institute a rule of burden of producing evidence for collision actions in our country and deems which is propitious to keep the development of shipping in order
有鑒于上述現狀，本文立足於本國法制特徵，在先輩的民事舉證責任制度理論成果基礎上，借鑒英美典型海事判例確定的舉證責任原則，對船舶碰撞中的舉證責任及其分配製度進行了考察；並從舉證責任分配規則的理論角度對1972年《國際海上避碰規則》進行了大膽的評析，在發現問題的基礎上提出了一些個人的觀點，以作為海事司法實踐的參考。 -
With the system of criminal trial in china is being changed from inquisitional into adversary, to perfect discovery system has become an urgent problem to be solved therefore, this article explores rule of corroboration in rule of evidence and is to benefit legislation and practice
隨著我國刑事庭審方式由法官主導的審問制向控辯雙方的對抗制的轉變，完善證據規則已經成為我國刑事訴訟中亟待解決的問題。故此，本文就證據規則中的補強證據規則進行了探討，以資有益於立法和實踐。 -
Thinking about the construction of witnesses ' rejection to the rule of giving evidence in china
對構建我國證人拒絕作證規則的思考 -
Take a broad view of the legislation and practices with the administration of justice in some western main countries governed by law for the guarantee measures of ciminal suspect s right of defense from the procedure of investigation, there are some differences in excluding rule of evidence, the lawyer ’ s right and the criminal suspect law aid, etc. however, the main countries governed by law above generally approve the criminal suspect enjoys the right of denfense during the course of investigation and has all stipulated the comparatively detailed guarantee measures to this kind of right
綜觀一些西方主要法治國家的立法規定與司法實踐，英美法系國家和大陸法系國家對于偵查程序中犯罪嫌疑人辯護權的保障措施，分別在證據排除規則，辯護律師的權利以及犯罪嫌疑人的法律援助等方面呈現出一些區別。但是兩大法系主要法治國家普遍地認可犯罪嫌疑人在偵查階段享有辯護權，而且對這種權利都規定了較為詳細的保障措施。 -
First, the generality of the rule of criminal evidence ; in this part, the penman defines the concept of evidence and implication and expressive forms and the rule of criminal evidence. moreover, emphasizes on explaining its important significance to the realization. second, the historic evolution of the rule of criminal evidence in china, as an important component of a civil law system, the rule of criminal evidence appears with different sorts of the rule of evidence in different countries
一、刑事證據制度概說通過對證據的概念加以定義，並對刑事訴訟證據的含義及表現形式、刑事訴訟證據制度的概念加以說明，著重說明刑事訴訟證據制度對刑法的實現具有重要的意義；二、我國刑事證據制度的歷史發展刑事證據制度作為國家法律制度的重要組成部分，在不同歷史類型的國家，有不同的證據制度。 -
In the development history of chinese society, there had appeared with three sorts : the ancient rule of evidence, the intimate rule of evidence and the modern rule of evidence
在我國社會的發展歷史上，主要表現過以下幾種類型的證據制度：我國古代刑事證據制度、我國近代刑事證據制度、我國現代刑事證據制度。
分享友人