time for protest 中文意思是什麼
time for protest
解釋
拒絕承兌證書的期限-
Article 183 the time limit for an appeal or a protest against a judgment shall be 10 days and the time limit for an appeal or a protest against an order shall be five days ; the time limit shall be counted from the day after the written judgment or order is received
第一百八十三條不服判決的上訴和抗訴的期限為十日，不服裁定的上訴和抗訴的期限為五日，從接到判決書、裁定書的第二日起算。 -
The present article understands that the improvement of the civil regime relies on insistence of the following principles : ( l ) the assurance of judicial justice, as to realize the axiological objective of the regime ; ( 2 ) proportional intervention, on interfering illicit civil activities, proportionality should be considered ; ( 3 ) procedural effectiviness, to achieve the maximum litigation effect with the minimum litigation cost specially for the cases in which technical defects are found, but in the mean time, common interest are not prejudiced, the promotion of civil protest may lead to an expenditure much higher than the litigation value, therefore, civil protest authority should not promote the civil protest
維護司法公正原則，是完善民事抗訴制度的重要原則之一，體現了制定這項制度的目的；適度干預原則在強調對違法民事行為進行干預的同時，指出這種干預應是適度的。抗訴的適度性體現在兩個方面：一是尊重當事人的處分權，二是維護法院裁判的既判力。訴訟效益原則指出，民事抗訴制度應以最少量的訴訟投入獲得最優化的訴訟效果，對于那些雖在技術上存在不足或缺憾之處但不損害公益的生效裁判，若提出抗訴可能導致人力物力的支出比裁判所涉及的訴訟標的額更大或造成當事人的無端訟累，抗訴機關不宜提出抗訴。 -
By so doing, the completeness of the civil procuratorial rights can be kept and the incorrect judgments and decisions by the courts can be corrected in time. ( b ) the people ' s procuratorates should have the right to protest against not only those that have taken effect but also these civil judgments that have not taken effect yet so as to lower the procedural costs. ( c ) it is important to prescribe clearly that the cases being protested by the procuratorates should be retried by the people ' s court that accepts such protests, ( d ) it is necessary to broaden and perfect the ways in which civil procuratorial supervisions are carried out and make it a st andard legal practice for the procuratorial organs to take legal proceedings, take part in the proceedings and raise procuratorial suggestions
一是民事檢察監督的形式過于單一，僅規定了人民檢察院對人民法院確有錯誤的民事判決、裁定有權提出抗訴這一種監督方式，除此之外並未規定其他的監督途徑；二是民事檢察監督的范圍過于狹窄，僅規定對已經發生法律效力的判決、裁定有權提出抗訴，而對未發生法律效力的判決、裁定能否監督未作規定，不僅如此，最高人民法院還不斷地作出司法解釋，對檢察機關可以抗訴的民事裁定的范圍逐步加以限制；三是基層人民檢察院沒有抗訴權，使大量案件集中在市級以上人民檢察院；四是人民檢察提出抗訴后，案件由哪一級人民法院再審，未作明確規定，造成了審級上的混亂。
分享友人