tort of negligence 中文意思是什麼

tort of negligence 解釋
過失侵權行為
  • tort : n. 【法律】侵權行為。
  • of : OF ＝Old French 古法語。
  • negligence : n. 1. 玩忽,疏忽；失職；【法律】過失；不留心,粗心大意；不介意,冷淡。2. 懶散,邋遢,不整齊。3. 【文藝】奔放不羈。
  1. User explicitly acknowledges and agrees that, except as expressly provided in the preceding paragraph, to the fullest extent allowed by law, hktb shall not be obligated or liable for any direct damages, contract damages, indirect damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, special damages, exemplary damages, warranty, tort including negligence damages, product liability damages or liabilities including, but not limited to, loss of digital content, prints, digital storage media, revenue and or profit, etc damages arising with respect to your use of discoverhongkong. com e - invites and the service, even if we have been advised or have knowledge of the possibility of such damages

    用戶明確確認及同意，除非前文各段有明確規定，否則在法律許可的最大限度下，香港旅遊發展局無需就閣下使用discoverhongkong . com e請卡及本服務而引起的任何直接損害賠償合約損害賠償間接損害賠償附帶損害賠償相應損害賠償特別損害賠償懲罰性損害賠償保證侵權包括疏忽損害賠償產品責任損害賠償或法律責任包括但不限於數碼內容列印本數碼儲存媒體收益及或利潤的損失而承擔任何責任，即使香港旅遊發展局已獲知會或已知悉該等損害賠償的可能性亦然。
  2. Environmental tort law in japan has originated in liability without negligence in public nuisance, today, liability without negligence and presumption of causation have become common legislation systems in environmental tort law all over the world, compensation and get rid of infringe are the major remedies in civil legal systems

    各國環境侵權法律制度中，無過失責任原則和因果關系推定規則已成為通制。在民事救濟上，主要是賠償損失和排除侵害，其中，在排除侵害的適用上，各國都帶有濃厚的利益權衡色彩。
  3. According to the status quo accredited point of view, concerning the man ' s actus reus and mens rea, his conduct is neither justifiable homicide, nor unpremeditated manslaughter ( negligence or imprudence ), nor mayhem, nor tort, but indirect intentional homicide

    根據目前的通說，考慮到該男子的犯罪客觀方面和犯罪主觀方面，他的行為既不是特別防衛，也不是過失致人死亡（包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失） ，也不是故意傷害，更不是民事侵權行為，而是間接故意殺人。
  4. In china environmental tort law system in modern sense has already, the forms of it are constitution law, civil law, environmental protection law, interpretation of law, etc. china ocean environmental protection law ( 1982 ) has established the criterion of liability without negligence, the requisites to constitute an environmental tort are injurious act, damage, causation, etc. among of them injurious act is the prerequisite of environmental tort

    我國環境侵權法的無過失責任原則最先是由《海洋環境保護法》確立的。環境侵權的構成要件有行為的違法性（侵害行為） 、損害事實、侵害行為與損害事實之間的因果關系等三個條件構成的。其中行為的違法性（侵害行為）是構成環境侵權的前提，因為合法行為不能引起民事責任的產生。
  5. And cpa will be liable for intentional tort liability or civil liability of negligence because of intention or negligence under tort law

    而在侵權法下，注冊會計師因主觀上的故意或過失作出虛假陳述時將承擔故意侵權或者過失侵權民事責任。
  6. Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action

    作者指出，董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事，而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外，第三人還包括二些特殊債權人，如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任，但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失，實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外，在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施，以保證公平受償。
  7. Every negligent tort shares three requirements : duty of care, breach of duty, and damage. based on the said three requirements, the article addresses the cpa ’ s civil liability for negligence

    本文主要以普通法國家過失侵權的構成要件:注意義務、注意義務的違反及損害為主線來論述過失侵權下注冊會計師民事責任問題。
  8. The ca should take the liability of tort when the relying party suffers for its negligence. the onus of proof should be on the ca as it is a professional organization. also, as the ca runs a high risk, it is necessary to put a reasonable limitation on its liability

    通過比較借鑒專家對第三人的民事責任制度，筆者認為認證機構和信賴方之間沒有合同關系，二者間是一種「信賴關系」 ;在認證機構因過失對信賴方造成損失時，認證機構應承擔侵權責任;因為認證機構的專業性，故應適用過錯推定原則;又因為認證機構的高風險性，故還應對其責任進行合理限制。
  9. Because a defendant is not liable, no matter how reckless his conduct, unless he owes a duty to the plaintiff. according to the accepted definition of restatement second of tort, negligence is conduct, which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm

    美國第二次侵權法重述給過失侵權下的定義是：過失侵權是指一個人沒有在法律所規定的，以保護其他人免受不合理的傷害危險的法律義務范圍內行為。
  10. Based on the comparison and analysis of the theories and practices of professional liability of both domestic and abroad, this thesis analyses the definition, characters and catalog of “ professional ”, the scope of “ third party ” and focuses on the doctrine of “ assumption of fault ”, the identification of “ negligence ” and “ the causation relation ” in a professional ’ s tort by negligence. this thesis also discusses how to reasonably limit the professional ’ s liability taking the high risk of the profession into account and proposes the professional liability insurance

    通過比較分析國內外的理論和實踐，本文論述了專家的概念、特徵和分類，第三人的范圍;並重點論述了「專家過失」侵權時適用的過錯推定原則，以及對專家「過失」 、 「因果關系」的具體認定;鑒于專家行業的高風險性，文章還對如何合理限制其責任進行了探討，主要論述了專家責任保險制度。
  11. 5. 3 under no circumstances shall egate2china be held liable for an delay or failure or disruption of the service resulting directly or indirectly from acts of nature, forces or causes beyond its reasonable control, including without limitation, internet failures, computer, telecommunications or any other equipment failures, electrical power failures, strikes, labour disputes, riots, insurrections, civil disturbances, shortages of labour or materials, fires, flood, storms, explosions, acts of god, war, governmental actions, orders of domestic or foreign courts or tribunals or non - performance of third parties. 5. 4 egate2china shall not be liable for any special, direct, indirect, punitive, incidental or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever including but not limited to damages for loss of profits or savings, business interruption, loss of information, whether in contract, negligence, tort or otherwise or any other damages resulting from any of the following : the use or the inability to use the service ; any defect in goods, samples, data, information or services purchased or obtained from a member or a third - party service provider through the site ; unauthorized access by third parties to data or private information of any member ; statements or conduct of any user of the site ; or any other matter relating to the service however arising, including negligence

    您與在「服務」上或通過「服務」物色的刊登廣告人士通訊或進行業務往來或參與其推廣活動，包括就相關貨物或服務付款和交付相關貨物或服務，以及與該等業務往來相關的任何其他條款、條件、保證或聲明，僅限於在您和該刊登廣告人士之間發生。您同意，對于因任何該等業務往來或因在「服務」上出現該等刊登廣告人士而發生的任何種類的任何損失或損毀，中國經濟門戶網無需負責或承擔任何責任。您如打算通過「服務」創設或參與與任何公司、股票行情、投資或證券有關的任何服務，或通過「服務」收取或要求與任何公司、股票行情、投資或證券有關的任何新聞信息、警戒性信息或其他資料，敬請注意，中國經濟門戶網不會就通過「服務」傳送的任何該等資料的準確性、有用性或可用性、可獲利性負責或承擔任何責任，且不會對根據該等資料而作出的任何交易或投資決策負責或承擔任何責任。
  12. Except in the event of breach of confidentiality, in no event shall either party be liable for any damages, including loss of data, lost profits, cost of cover or other special, incidental, consequential, direct or indirect damages arising from the use of the products, or provision of, or failure to provide, support, however caused and whether based on agreement, tort ( including negligence ) or any other theory of liability

    除非違反了保密規定，任何一方在任何情況下，對因使用產品、或提供或未提供支持，無論何種原因，亦無論基於協議、侵權（包括過失）或其他責任理論而引起的損害，包括數據丟失、利潤損失、服務費用或其他特殊的、附帶的、後果性的、直接的或間接的損害均不負賠償責任。
  13. In no event shall either party be liable to the other for any special or other indirect damages of any kind, including but not limited to, loss of profits or damages, however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in any action for contract, strict liability or tort ( including negligence ) or any other legal or equitable grounds

    在任何事件中，對于任何特殊和間接的損害雙方都要承擔責任，包括不受限制的利益損失或損害，無論什麼原因和責任推斷，是否屬于合同規定內的行為，都要以法律和公平為依據，明確責任和民事侵權行為（包括因疏忽造成的後果） 。
  14. By entering the promotion, entrant or, in the case of a minor, his her parent or legal guardian releases and shall procure his her nominees to release hktb and any of its directors, officers, employees, agencies and sponsors collectively, the " released parties " from any liability whatsoever, and waive any and all causes of action, for any claims, costs, injuries, losses, or damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the contest or the use of the prize and related activities including, without limitation, claims, costs, injuries, losses and damages related to personal injuries, death, damage to or destruction of property, rights of publicity or privacy, defamation or portrayal in a false light, whether intentional or unintentional, whether under contract, tort including negligence, warranty or others

    參加本推廣活動，即表示參賽者如參賽者並未成年，則為參賽者之父母或其合法監護人就由於或關於是次比賽或獎品的使用及相關活動而根據合約侵權包括疏忽保證或其他基礎提出的任何種類的申索費用傷害損失或損害賠償包括但不限於有關人身傷害死亡財物損毀公開或私隱權利有意或無意誹謗或失實描述的索償費用傷害損失或損害賠償，免除並促使其提名人士免除旅發局及其任何董事高級職員雇員代理及贊助商統稱獲免責人士的任何責任及放棄任何及所有訴訟因由。
  15. In no event will 2000fun be liable for any damages caused by subscriber s failure to perform subscriber s obligation or for any loss of use, loss of time, inconvenience, commercial loss, loss of profits or savings, costs or expenses or other incidental or consequential damages howsoever arising, whether in contract, or in tort and whether resulting from interference with transmission for any cause whatsoever, over - loading, negligence or strict liability in tort or by reason of any act, omission or default of 2000fun, it s employee, agent consultant or contractor

    2嚴禁所有用戶利用2000fun的網路設備從事不法活動，包括派發傳送和刊登商業機密淫褻侵權物品，或其它法律上被評定為恐嚇性和淫褻不雅的物品，若違法，們將會立即終止服務協議，並不作另行通知，若因此對2000fun造成任何損失，客戶需負全部責任並賠償損失。 3嚴禁用戶利用2000fun的網路設備發放大量的宣傳電郵。
  16. Environmental tort has had great influence on civil rights systems, so the criterion of liability, requisites to constitute an environmental tort and the function of liability without negligence are emphasized in this thesis

    環境侵權對民事權利制度產生著重大影響。本文著重論述了環境侵權的歸責原則和環境侵權的構成要件以及無過錯原則的作用和意義。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書