trial supervision 中文意思是什麼

trial supervision 解釋
審判監督
  • trial : n. 1. （好壞、性能等的）試驗；（人或物的）試用；試車。2. 【運】選拔賽，預賽。3. 考驗，磨難，困難，患難；討厭的人[東西]；【法律】審問；審判。adj. ＝trinal.
  • supervision : n. 監督；管理。 under the supervision of 在…監督下。
  1. Civil adjudication supervision procedure is an important part of china ' s trial system. studying and probing the connotation, function and jurisprudence basis of the system is beneficial to objectively recognize, evaluate and upgrade china ' s current judicial system. moreover, it is also beneficial to the research and development of china ' s system of action

    民事審判監督程序是我國審判制度的重要的組成部分，研究和探討該制度的涵義、功能和法理基礎等，有利於客觀認識、評價和完善我國當前的司法體制，有利於我國訴訟體制的研究和發展。
  2. The new trial system is one of the important systems of remedy, supervision and correction, and it also the last guardline of the last protective screen

    再審制度就是其中一項重要的救濟、監督與糾錯制度，而且是最後屏障的最後一道閘口。
  3. Part 3 points out that power of criminal trial and power of criminal adjudication are the expressions of criminal judicial power, so the supervision should be carried out from the angles of legality of judges " judicial acts and appropriateness of adjudication

    法官在將刑事司法權變現的過程中，其行為的適當與否、合法與否、公正與否，以及法官在客觀條件下的行為理性，不僅與刑事司法的效果相關聯，而且與個人的權利能否得到維護相關聯。
  4. Thinking about issues concerning the procedure for civil trial supervision

    關於民事訴訟審判監督程序的幾點思考
  5. Procedure for trial supervision

    審判監督程序
  6. The value of open trial is that it create the condition of social supervision and make contribution to the justice of trial procedure and judgment

    文章認為，審判公開原則的基本意義在於創造了社會監督的條件，促進了審判程序公正和裁判結果公正。
  7. As an error - correcting procedure, the procedure for trial supervision is not a necessary adjudicative procedure for every case, but a legal form to realize trial supervision. the procedure for trial supervision plays an unsubstituted important role in protecting the people ' s legitimate rights and interests, and safeguarding judicial justice

    作為一種糾錯程序，審判監督程序不是每個案件都必經的審判程序，是實現審判監督的一種法定形式，對保護人民群眾的合法權益，維護司法公正，有著不可替代的重要作用。
  8. In addition, despite regulations on protest against effective court decisions, exercise of supervision in the form of protest is still riddled - with difficulties as a result of lack of clarification on issues essential to fully function of the protest system such as transfer of documents for review, protest and trial level

    另外，雖然在《民事訴訟法》中對生效裁判的抗訴制度作了規定，但是對確保抗訴制度正常運作的調卷審查，抗級審級等問題未予明確，以致使抗訴監督的實施困難重重。
  9. In the treatise, the author believes that civil procedure for trial supervision is a procedure that people ' s procuratorate, on the basis of legal supervision rights, or a party to an action, on the basis of rights to apply for retrial, finds that there is error in a legally effective judgment or mediation agreement made by a people ' s court and asks for the court to retrial

    筆者認為，民事審判監督程序是指人民檢察院基於法律監督權，當事人基於再審申請權，認為人民法院已生效的民事判決或調解協議確有錯誤，依照法定程序，要求人民法院並由人民法院依法對該案件進行再審的程序。
  10. Thoughts on giving full play to the role of civil trial supervision system

    對充分發揮民事審判監督制度作用的思考
  11. Besides the different subjects men - tioned above, there are other differences, such as limita - tion without institution deadline in trial supervision pro - cedure, compare the institution causes principle, simple trial procedure, formal trial usually, essential trial by law of court ( not like institution retrial on the basis of new evidence )

    但其審判監督程序的提起，與依新證據提起再審程序的區別很大，主體不同前邊已講過，還有審判監督程序的提起無期限限制，提起事由規定得比較原則、審查程序很簡單，一般為形式審查，不象依新證據提起再審那樣，法院要進行實質審查。
  12. From the procedural function, the trial supervision system can be used to remedy the faults in trial process and litigants ’ legal rights, to restrict and supervise public power, to safeguard justice and the dignity of law and to change the traditional ides of complain

    從制度功能來看，民事再審制度具有在程序上對訴訟過程補強的功能;具有權力制約、程序監督的功能;具有對當事人合法權益救濟的功能;具有維護司法公正、法的尊嚴和司法的輿論效果的功能;具有改變中國傳統申訴觀念的功能。
  13. Unscrambling of the procedure for civil trial supervision ' s structure defect

    管理人員績效評估的初步探索
  14. Then i compare the concept, characteristic, subject, object, the conditions on which a case is brought to court for retrial and court procedure of retrial procedure in western countries with the popular trial supervision in china, distinguish their sameness and differences, declare that i will discuss and study the compare between china and foreign countries and the innova - tion orient of the retrial procedure institution subject system in the name of the more scientific retrial procedure

    其次，對西方國家的再審程序與中國現行的審判監督程序，在概念、特徵、主體、客體、提起條件、審理程序等方面作以比較，區別其異同，陳明本文要以較科學的再審程序為名，來討論、研究再審程序提起主體制度的中外比較、改革方向。
  15. Basic thoughts on the reformation of the trial supervision procedure

    試論我國再審改革的基本思路
  16. The present procedure for civil trial supervision for our country refers the pattem of the soviet union, which over emphasizes state intervention ; and emphasizes that " truth " is discovered by court instead of by state

    我國現行民事審判監督程序參照了前蘇聯的模式，國家干預色彩較重，強調由法院代表國家發現「真理」 。
  17. Therefore set out the actual state of our country, according to the advanced way of some nations in the world, the perfection of our country of the procedure of criminal trial supervision goes necessarily

    在分析我國現行刑事審判監督程序的實際情況的前提下，結合我國的具體國情，比較國際上的先進做法，有選擇地找出適合借鑒的對象，嘗試著提出幾點發展出路。
  18. Procedure for trial supervision is a measure and method that must be obeyed when a case should be properly handled, which is only aimed at the case that has possessed legal effect. but still has errors too. the procedure for trial supervision will correct such case through a trial again

    審判監督程序，是對判決和裁定已經發生法律效力而又確有錯誤的案件，通過重新審判，加以糾正，使案件得到正確處理時所應遵循的步驟、方式、方法。
  19. Furthermore, the author puts forward his suggestions on perfecting chinese trial supervision system which could comply with basic theory of civil procedural law, protection of litigant ’ s procedural rights, with the function of res judicata and the very characteristic of the trial supervision system

    在此基礎上，對我國建構符合民事訴訟基本法理、保障當事人程序權利、維護審級制度應有效力、體現再審制度本質特徵的民事再審制度，提出了設想和方案。
  20. From the system value, the value basis of the trial supervision system is the fair judgment on private dispute, the right basis is the actio and disposition right of litigants, the objective basis is the pursuit to res judicata. the second part proceeds the comparative research on civil retrial system

    從制度價值來看，對私權爭議的公正裁判是民事再審制度存在的程序價值基礎;當事人的訴權與處分權是民事再審制度構築的權利基礎;對判決既判力正當性的追求是民事再審制度構築的目的基礎。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書