憲制文件 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [xiànzhìwénjiàn]
憲制文件
英文
constitutional instrument- 憲 : 名詞1. (法令) statute2. (憲法) constitution 3. (姓氏) a surname
- 制 : Ⅰ動詞1 (製造) make; manufacture 2 (擬訂; 規定) draw up; establish 3 (用強力約束; 限定; 管束...
- 文 : Ⅰ名詞1 (字) character; script; writing 2 (文字) language 3 (文章) literary composition; wri...
- 件 : Ⅰ量詞(用於個體事物) piece; article; item Ⅱ名詞1. (指可以一一計算的事物) 2. (文件) letter; correspondence; paper; document
- 文件 : 1 (公文、信件等) document; file; papers; instrument 2 [自動化] file; 文件保護 file protection; ...
-
For example, american judicial review is activism. japanese judicial review is passivism. but it ’ s important for separation of powers and rights of people. the aim of this dissertation is to introduce and research the constitutional review of japan
本文從探討日本違憲審查制度建立的歷史背景入手,對日本違憲審查的性質、主體、對象、違憲審查行使的條件與界限以及違憲審查的效力等基本問題進行了詳細的分析。The olympic charter is the codification of the fundamental principles of olympism, rules and bye - laws adopted by the international olympic committee
奧林匹克憲章olympic charter是國際奧委會制定的關于奧林匹克運動的最高法律文件。The basic law provides a constitutional framework for the hong kong special administrative region. it institutionalises the concept of " one country, two systems "
《基本法》是香港特別行政區憲制性的法律文件,把一國兩制的概念,以法律形式鄭重地規定下來。At the same time, our national leaders have stressed that under the commitments of " one country, two systems " and " hong kong people running hong kong " with a " high degree of autonomy ", it is up to us to make our own decisions and to chart our own course
與此同時,國家領導人強調,根據一國兩制、港人治港和高度自治的承諾,香港享有自主權、自決權。我們的憲制文件《基本法》已保證賦予香港自治的權力。While the hong kong courts have demonstrated a generous and purposive approach to interpretation of the basic law, mainland interpretations have shown a greater affinity for the original meaning of the words. different views on interpretation highlight the inherent tensions within the basic law, which exists as both a chinese law and a constitution in hong kong s common law system of justice
去處理,而內地則較多傾向採用字面意義解釋法,這些對釋法的不同觀點正突出基本法自身的張力-既是中國法律的一部份,亦是香港普通法法制下的憲法性文件。The basic law, hong kong s constitutional document, came into effect guaranteeing hong kong s way of life for 50 years after 1997
香港的憲制文件基本法開始實施,保證香港的生活方式在一九九七年後最少50年不變。The basic law - which is the constitutional document of the hong kong special administrative region ( hksar ) - came into effect when british administration ended at midnight on june 30, 1997
香港特別行政區的憲制文件《基本法》 ,隨英國在一九九七年六月三十日午夜結束在香港的管治而宣告實施。In the uk, it takes the principle of the slander system in the common law and forms maturity burden of proof system ; the case of new york times co. v. sullivan in 1964, takes the american media defamation into a new step of adjustment of constitution law, and the american law field also makes an effort to construct a better reasonable burden of proof system besides the tortious law
英國秉承著傳統普通法在誹謗制度上的原則,形成了一個較為完備的證明責任體系; 1964年的「 《紐約時報》訴薩利文案」則使美國媒體誹謗案件進入了憲法調整的新階段,美國司法界一直努力在侵權法體系之外構建一個更合理的證明責任制度。The ultimate source of our confidence in this respect is, of course, the solid promises of the constitutional document, our basic law
我們的信心當然是來自香港的憲制性文件《基本法》給我們作出的確切承諾。As hong kong s constitution, the basic law is the supreme law in the region, and other laws inconsistent with it can be invalidated by the courts
作為一份憲制性文件,基本法是香港特別行政區的最高法律依據,而違反基本法的法例,可被法院視?不具法律效力。The writer tries to study and analyse the history that how the foreign procuratorates started the legal proceedings of the civil lawsuits, and tries to introduce the practical research on it, in the recent years in our country. the writer also tries to emphasize the necessary and reality to set up again the system of the above item. at the sametime, the writer tries to study about the theoretical basis, the constitution basis and practical necessary
本文通過分析各國檢察機關提起民事訴訟的歷史沿革,結合我國檢察機關近年來逐步開展的對部分民事案件提起訴訟的做法,闡述重新確立我國檢察機關提起民事訴訟制度的現實必要性;同時,探尋檢察機關提起民事訴訟的理論依據、客觀需要和憲法基礎;並就檢察機關提起民事訴訟需遵循的原則、民事案件的受案范圍和法律地位等實現檢察機關提起民事訴訟的關鍵問題,筆者不揣淺陋,試圖就上述問題作些粗淺的探討。This paper discusses the innovation of the eu judicial system under the nice treaty and draft treaty establishing constitution for europe
本文結合尼斯條約和歐盟憲法草案這兩個法律文件,就歐盟司法制度的改革問題進行初步的探討與分析。分享友人