損益兩平點 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sǔnyìliǎngpíngdiǎn]
損益兩平點 英文
b. e. p
  • 損 : Ⅰ動詞1 （減少） decrease; lose 2 （損害） harm; damage 3 [方言] （用尖刻的話挖苦人） speak sarcas...
  • 益 : Ⅰ名詞1 （好處） benefit; profit; advantage 2 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ形容詞（有益的） beneficialⅢ動詞...
  • 兩 : Ⅰ數詞1 （數目） two 2 （表示不定的數目） some; a few Ⅱ量詞（市兩的通稱） liang a unit of weight ...
  • 平 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （沒有高低凹凸 不頃斜） flat; level; even; smooth 2 （高度相同; 不相上下） on the same l...
  • 點 : Ⅰ名詞1 （液體的小滴） drop （of liquid） 2 （細小的痕跡） spot; dot; speck 3 （漢字的筆畫「、」）...
  • 損益 : 1. （減少和增加） increase and decrease 2. （賠和賺） profit and loss; gains and losses
  1. It aims to bring up to date china ' s laws and regulations of compensation for casualties at sea, so that they would better fit in with the fast - changing social, economical and legal situations in china after its accession to the world trade organization. it attempts to seek out, to be specific, a way of compensation as sound as possible which would maximally protect the legitimate rights of both the owners of vessels and the victims, hopefully by satisfactorily balancing the interests of the two parties. the ultimate purpose of this paper therefore, is to provide certain theoretical support for modifying relevant laws and regulations in this realm in china

    研究的目的在於適應我國法律法規不斷完善的新形勢，使海上人身傷亡損害賠償的法律規定與各相關法律規定接軌，與我國加入wto后的新形勢接軌；並根據我國的國情，探求一種科學合理的海上人身傷亡損害賠償辦法，盡可能地找到一個海上運輸業和受害者兩者利益間的平衡點，使海上運輸業和受害者的合法權利得到更加充分的保護；進一步研究海上人身傷亡損害賠償的法律理論基礎，為進一步修改我國海上人身傷亡損害賠償的有關法律提供依據。
  2. Because our legal system belong to the common law, but anticipatory breach is the characteristic of english - american law, can anticipatory breach solve the problems in common law ? when the anticipatory breach is introduced, are there conflicts in the institution ? how to improve the anticipatory breach with these projblems with some faults and shortcomings ? this paper inquires these things in three parts. starting bread with the two outside forms of the auticipatory and the two outside forms of the auticipatory non - permermance, the first part of the passage inquires the value and the orcial base of the anticipatory breach by surveyingjit ' s origination and changing process under the origination and changing process under the special historical background. by comparing the anticipatory breach with counterargument right for security, the second part states a viewpoint that the former is superior is superior to the latter in protection parties " lawful rights though there are many similarities and differences between them. from this, we can come to a comclusion that the counterargument right for security is no substition for conticipetory breach and that the former should be part of the latter. the third party gives a detailed explanation of anticipatory breach in english ? american law systems in chinese system of anticipatory breach. finally, the anther makes some important suggestion : first, the subject of counterargument right for security should be attend to either party of the contract

    其價值在於使受害方能提前獲得法律上的救濟，防止其蒙受本來可以避免的損失。第二部分筆者通過對預期違約與不安抗辯權的比較研究，對我國《合同法》應如何處理、協調來自不同法系的這兩項並不完全相同的法律制度的關系提出了自己的觀點。筆者認為不安抗辯權是通過對合同利益期待權的保護，實現法律「公平」和「安全」的價值，而預期違約除標示上述價值目標外，更是法律對「效率違約」這一經濟理論的認可，顯示了法律對「效益」這一價值目標的追求，從而提出預期違約與不安杭辮權二者制度功能相似而制度構造不同，預期違約制度較之不安杭辮權更有利於保護當事人的合法權益，由此得出我國《合同法》中不安抗辮權不僅不能替代預期違約，而是預期違約應該吸納不安抗辮權的結論
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書