搶劫未遂 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qiāngjiéwèisuì]
搶劫未遂 英文
attempted robbery
  • : 搶動詞1 (搶劫) rob; loot 2 (搶奪) snatch; grab 3 (搶先; 爭先) vie for; scramble for 4 (趕...
  • : Ⅰ副詞1 (沒) did not; have not 2 (不) not Ⅱ名詞1 (地支的第八位) the eighth of the twelve ear...
  • : 遂Ⅰ動詞1. (順; 如意) satisfy; fulfil 2. (成功) succeed Ⅱ副詞[書面語] (就; 於是) then; thereupon Ⅲ名詞(姓氏) a surname
  • 搶劫 : rob; loot; plunder
  • 未遂 : not accomplished; not fulfilled
  1. This paper compares the legal regulations concerning the applicable conditions and the recognition of the crime and proposes : ( 1 ) the prerequisites should be extended to include the acts of robbery. snatch, and deception ; ( 2 ) the " violence " as an objective condition should be interpreted as the violent and forcing actions in robbery, while " on site " should be the site of the stealing, deception, or snatch, or the area involved in the crime with the site as the center ; ( 3 ) the connotation of the subjective condition " harboring the stolen goods, resisting an - eat, destroying criminal evidence " needs expansion ; ( 4 ) dual criteria should be adopted emphasizing on both the act and the consequence in distinguishing the completed crime and the criminal attempt ; and ( 5 ) in case of overlap of law and imaginary concurrence of crimes only by convicting the crime as theft, snatch, and deception can it be regarded as transformed robbery

    本文通過比較不同國家該罪的有關法律規定,對我國轉化型罪的適用條件及法律認定問題進行分析,認為: ( 1 )前提條件應擴展為實施盜竊、奪、詐騙行為; ( 2 )客觀條件中「暴力」應與罪中的暴力與脅迫行為作同樣理解, 「當場」應是實施盜竊、詐騙、奪行為的當場或以犯罪現場為中心、與犯罪分子活動有關的范圍; ( 3 )主觀條件中「窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕、毀滅罪證」的內涵應有所延伸; ( 4 )既的判定應採用既主張行為又注意結果的雙重標準; ( 5 )在想象競合或法條競合時只有以盜竊、奪、詐騙罪論處方可轉化為罪。
  2. Bemused diners watched as three hapless thieves unsuccessfully tried to kick open a sliding door in a botched attempt to rob an australian seafood restaurant

    22日,在澳大利亞一家餐館門口日前上演了一場無驚無險的搶劫未遂案。 3名歹徒兩手空空地離開現場,而食客則平靜地"欣賞"了整個過程。
  3. Part iv addresses capital punishment on robbery. the author demonstrates the concept, features of robbery and the line between completed robbery and attempted robbery, guilt and not guilt for robbery, robbery and other crimes in part i. in his view, the perpetrator ' s actual taking should be the standard to distinguish completed robbery from attempted robbery

    在第一部分,筆者闡述了罪的概念、特徵、罪既、罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的界限問題,認為應以行為人是否實際得財物,作為區分罪既的標準。
  4. The penal code article 263 for the aggravation of robbing offense to make of provision as follows : “ there is one of the following situations of, place imprisonment for a specific term with above decade, life imprisonment or death penalty, and fine money or confiscate property : ( 1 ) rob going into the door ; ( 2 ) rob on the public vehicle ; ( 3 ) rob bank or other financing institutions ; ( 4 ) rob for many times or huge of ; ( 5 ) rob with the result that person ' s severely wounded or death of ; ( 6 ) rob pretend to be what military police rob he is ; ( 7 ) rob holding gun ; ( 8 ) rob for use by the military supplies or rob insurance, relief, relief supplies. ” the writer tallies up, the aggravation of robbing offense is a special criminal behavior

    本文圍繞罪加重犯構成特徵、類型劃分以及既問題,將罪加重犯分為五種表現形態? ?地點加重犯、手段加重犯、結果加重犯、對象加重犯以及數額、數量加重犯,針對理論界和實踐中的罪加重犯八種情形中的熱點問題,筆者一一進行探討,努力提出自己的新觀點。當然,筆者水平有限,難免存在不足之處,筆者希望以本文為契機,在以後的學習中能進一步鉆研,使自己的專業知識更上一層樓。
  5. According to peculiarity of crime of robbery, the author asserts that crime of robbery has double object. combining the general provision and the specific provision, the author asserts that crime of robbery can be regarded as completion of a crime when any of its objects is harmed

    二、罪既的界限筆者根據本罪的特殊性,結合刑法總則與分則,認為在雙重客體當中,任何一種客體受到實際損害都應該認定為既
分享友人