搶奪罪 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qiāngduózuì]
搶奪罪 英文
crime of forcible seizure
  • : 搶動詞1 (搶劫) rob; loot 2 (搶奪) snatch; grab 3 (搶先; 爭先) vie for; scramble for 4 (趕...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (犯法的行為) crime; guilt 2 (過失) fault; misconduct; blame; wrongdoing 3 (苦難; 痛苦...
  • 搶奪 : snatch; wrest; seize; grab
  1. Whoever forcibly seizes public or private money or property, if the amount is relatively large, shall be guilty of seizing, and shall be imaginative joinder of offences of negligently causing another serious injury or negligent homicide if at the same time he causes another serious injury or death and then shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions for a heavier punishment

    實施公私財物行為,構成搶奪罪,同時過失造成被害人重傷、死亡等後果的,是搶奪罪與過失致人重傷、過失致人死亡的想象競合,擇一重處罰。 「攜帶凶器」作為搶奪罪的從重情節來處罰是比較合理的,從目前立法狀況下, 「攜帶凶器」可以說是對脅迫行為不能包含的內容進行補充。
  2. This paper compares the legal regulations concerning the applicable conditions and the recognition of the crime and proposes : ( 1 ) the prerequisites should be extended to include the acts of robbery. snatch, and deception ; ( 2 ) the " violence " as an objective condition should be interpreted as the violent and forcing actions in robbery, while " on site " should be the site of the stealing, deception, or snatch, or the area involved in the crime with the site as the center ; ( 3 ) the connotation of the subjective condition " harboring the stolen goods, resisting an - eat, destroying criminal evidence " needs expansion ; ( 4 ) dual criteria should be adopted emphasizing on both the act and the consequence in distinguishing the completed crime and the criminal attempt ; and ( 5 ) in case of overlap of law and imaginary concurrence of crimes only by convicting the crime as theft, snatch, and deception can it be regarded as transformed robbery

    本文通過比較不同國家該的有關法律規定,對我國轉化型的適用條件及法律認定問題進行分析,認為: ( 1 )前提條件應擴展為實施盜竊、、詐騙行為; ( 2 )客觀條件中「暴力」應與中的暴力與脅迫行為作同樣理解, 「當場」應是實施盜竊、詐騙、行為的當場或以犯現場為中心、與犯分子活動有關的范圍; ( 3 )主觀條件中「窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕、毀滅證」的內涵應有所延伸; ( 4 )既遂與未遂的判定應採用既主張行為又注意結果的雙重標準; ( 5 )在想象競合或法條競合時只有以盜竊、、詐騙論處方可轉化為
  3. As for his father, because he cruelly oppressed, spoiled his brother by violence, and did that which is not good among his people, lo, even he shall die in his iniquity

    結18 : 18至於他父親、因為欺人太甚、弟兄、在本國的民中行不善、他必因自己的孽死亡。
  4. A comparison between the crime of robbery and crime of snatching

    搶奪罪辨析
  5. Crime of stealing or seizing guns, ammunition or explosives

    盜竊槍支彈藥爆炸物
  6. But his father will die for his own sin, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was wrong among his people

    18至於他父親、因為欺人太甚、弟兄、在本國的民中行不善、他必因自己的孽死亡。
  7. As for his father, because he was cruel, took goods by force, and did what is not good among his people, truly, death will overtake him in his evil - doing

    至於他父親。因為欺人太甚,弟兄,在本國的民中行不善,他必因自己的孽死亡。
  8. " as for his father, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was not good among his people, behold, he will die for his iniquity

    結18 : 18至於他父親、因為欺人太甚、弟兄、在本國的民中行不善、他必因自己的孽死亡。
  9. First of all, robbery is defined as an illegal act of possessing owners ’ property with violence, threats, or other illegal methods. the transforming crime refers to the crime of an executor when or after carrying out an act of one crime, his act has met constitute of another crime due to the appearance of certain special fact or element

    我國《刑法》第二百六十九條規定: 「犯盜竊、詐騙、搶奪罪,為窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕或者毀滅證而當場使用暴力或者以暴力相威脅的,依照本法第二百六十三條的規定定處罰。 」
  10. Article 269 whoever commits the crime of theft, fraud or forcible seizure of money or property and uses violence on the spot or threatens to use violence in order to conceal the booty, resist arrest or destroy the criminal evidence shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of article 263 of this law

    第二百六十九條犯盜竊、詐騙、搶奪罪,為窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕或者毀滅證而當場使用暴力或者以暴力相威脅的,依照本法第二百六十三條的規定定處罰。
  11. The targets of crime of seizing all can be those of theft, but the targets of theft are not included by those of seizing

    搶奪罪的犯對象都可以成為盜竊的犯對象,但盜竊的犯對象搶奪罪並不一定能夠涵括。
  12. The amount involved is the one of constitutive requirements in determining crime of seizing, while the circumstances have no functions in this aspect

    的數額是成立搶奪罪的構成要件結果,的情節在定中不起作用。
  13. In theory, crimes of robbery and theft have been deeply studied, but the researches on crime of seizing, which exists independently between the above - mentioned crimes, are relatively few

    理論界對和盜竊研究甚多,而對在與盜竊夾縫中獨立的搶奪罪探討的專文甚少。
  14. However, in the countries and districts where crime of seizing is considered as a kind of independent crime, its range changes according as the violence of robbing is required in various degrees and whether secretly stealing is one of constitutive requirements of theft

    在專門設立了搶奪罪的國家和地區,對暴力程度的限定不同和對盜竊是否規定為秘密竊取,搶奪罪的外延隨之存在寬窄之別。
  15. In the judicial practices, the cases of forcibly seizing especially seizing by means of utilizing the motor vehicles are increasing daily, and thus many controversial questions about their conviction and punishment arise, so the study on crime of seizing has great theoretical value and realistic meaning

    在司法實踐中,案件特別是飛車案件日益增多,在定性量刑上出現了一些爭議較大的新問題,所以對搶奪罪進行研究具有一定的現實意義和理論價值。
  16. The precedent conduct in converted robbery under article 269 of criminal law does not necessarily to be larceny, fraud or larceny in presence. the " scene " for the subsequent conduct may be the scene of larceny, fraud or larceny in presence, it may also be the chasing place after the perpetrator was found on the crime committing site or the place immediately next to the crime committing site

    刑法第269條規定的轉化型,不要求行為人的前提行為構成盜竊、詐騙、搶奪罪,後行為中的「當場」既可以是實施盜竊、詐騙、行為的現場,也可以是行為人在實施盜竊、詐騙、行為的現場或剛一離開該現場就被人立即發現並及時進行追捕的場所。
  17. In most countries of continental law and anglo - american law systems, the act of forcible seizure is classified into robbery or theft

    英美法系和大陸法系均把行為併入了盜竊
  18. Theft, snatch, rob, defraud and blackmail are all the crimes that transfer possession of property from one to the other. but establishment of misappropriation need n ' t transfer possession of property

    盜竊、劫、詐騙和敲詐勒索是轉移財產佔有的犯,侵佔是不轉移佔有的犯,在這些直接領得型犯中,都涉及到財產佔有概念問題。
分享友人