教唆犯罪的 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [jiāosuōfànzuìde]
教唆犯罪的
英文
promoting feudal superstitions sexually suggestive material gambling violence murder- 教 : 教動詞(把知識或技能傳給人) teach; instruct
- 唆 : 動詞(唆使) instigate; abet
- 犯 : Ⅰ動詞1 (抵觸; 違犯) go against; offend; violate 2 (侵犯) attack; violate; work against 3 (發...
- 罪 : Ⅰ名詞1 (犯法的行為) crime; guilt 2 (過失) fault; misconduct; blame; wrongdoing 3 (苦難; 痛苦...
- 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
- 教唆 : instigate; abet; put sb. up to sth. ; incite
- 犯罪 : commit a crime [an offense]: 犯罪的中止 desistance from offense; 犯罪和青少年犯罪 crime and delin...
-
O lord, heavenly king, comforter, spirit of truth, have compassion and mercy on thy sinful servant and pardon my unworthiness, and forgive me all the sins that i humanly committed today, and not only humanly but even worse than a beast - my voluntary sins, known and unknown, from my youth and from evil suggestions, and from my brazenness, and from boredom
主,天上的君王,護慰者,真理之靈,求你同情並憐憫你有罪的僕役,原諒我的不配,並寬恕我今天所犯的一切人性的過犯,甚至不止出於人性的惡習,而是比禽獸更卑劣的罪孽或有意或無意,自知或不自知,出於我的幼稚或來自魔鬼的教唆,出自鹵莽及出自懈惰。Based on the analysis of autonomous attributes of abettors, this paper analyses the inherent unification of special attributes of abettors : joint crime, inchoate crime and quantity of crime
摘要在教唆犯獨立性質基礎之上,教唆犯的共犯形態、未完成形態、罪數形態的內在統一,構成教唆犯的特殊形態。The second section is concerned with joint crime theory related to the instigator in civil law
第二部分大陸法系有關教唆犯的共同犯罪理論。" what has become of danglars, the instigator, and therefore the most guilty ?
「騰格拉爾,那個教唆犯,就是那個罪名最重的人,他怎麼樣了? 」How to delimit the quality of instigator directly influences the delimitation of the nature of joint crime
教唆犯的性質的定位直接影響著共同犯罪的性質的定位。Article 29 anyone who instigates another to commit a crime shall be punished according to the role he plays in a joint crime
第二十九條教唆他人犯罪的,應當按照他在共同犯罪中所起的作用處罰。Since the concept of instigator can be ascertained through explaining the concept of instigation, we can also observe that " an instigation is an offence carried out to instigate someone to commit a crime.
同時,由於教唆犯既可以從行為人的角度理解,也可以從行為的角度理解,所以教唆犯的概念可表述為:教唆犯是教唆他人犯罪的人(或行為) 。There are various statements, of instigator, which are somewhat different. the received definition of instigator, namely " an instigator is a person who instigates someone to commit a crime ", is concise but adequate to reveal the connotation of instigator, so it is a rather ideal statement
國內有幾種關于教唆犯的概念的表述,這些表述有其不同之處,其中通說所認同的「教唆犯是教唆他人犯罪的人」的表述是最為簡潔的表述,同時也能夠揭示教唆犯的應有內涵,與其他幾種表述比較,是更為可取的一種定義。Instigation has only independence but not dependence from the following angles : revised constitution of crime can directly be utilized to convict ; instigation has serious harmfulness, violates the social relations protected by criminal law and deserves conviction and penalty itself ; to ponder over the circumstances of instigatee during conviction does not indicate the dependence of instigation ; there is causality between instigation and the harmful consequences brought by the crime committed by the instigatee ; literate dependence is not equal to the dependence of instigation ; insisting on the independence of instigation will not lead to convicting by thought ; to recognize the independence of instigation is required by the principle of personal responsibility ; it is a worldwide tendency to accept the independence of instigation in legislation
從下列八個方面可以得出教唆犯只應具有獨立性,而不具有從屬性:修正的犯罪構成可直接作為定罪的根據;教唆犯罪具有嚴重的社會危害性,本身就侵犯了刑法所保護的社會關系,具有犯罪性和可罰性;教唆犯的定罪、處罰要考慮到被教唆人的情況,但這並不是教唆犯從屬性的體現;教唆行為對被教唆人實施的犯罪所造成的危害結果具有原因力;文理上的從屬性並不能證明教唆犯具有從屬性;教唆犯獨立性說並不是主觀歸罪;堅持教唆犯獨立性說是貫徹刑法個人責任的要求;教唆犯獨立性說是各國立法的趨勢。This section firstly discusses divergence of views in academic circles of china, and, rejecting the former method of research on the instigator that did not differentiate whether the instigated committed the crime of instigation or not and distinguishing the two cases of instigation, redefines the scope and nature of the instigator
這一部分從我國學界認識上的分歧談起,拋開了學界過去研究教唆犯不分被教唆者犯與沒犯被教唆之罪而籠統地對教唆犯研究的方法,釐清了教唆犯的兩種不同情況,對教唆犯的范圍、性質進行了重新定位。In complicity, in order to constitute crime discontinuance, the conductor should not only take measures to prevent the result of his or her action, but also take measures to prevent the result of his or her accomplice ' s action and practically avoid the happening of crime result
以此為標準,文章根據共同犯罪行為人的分類分別對主犯、從犯、脅從犯和教唆犯成立犯罪中止的情形進行了論述。在對犯罪中止進行上述分析和探討的基礎上,文章最後對完善我國刑法犯罪中止制度提出了自己的觀點。Uncompleted pattern of abettor is one of the most complicated issues in the theory of complicity
教唆犯的未遂是共同犯罪理論中最為復雜的問題之一,一向就有爭論。It is shown that there are different degree defects in a few definitions in the theories field. in overview of the general requests for giving a definition and the character of the offense of insurance fraud, the writer views that the offense of insurance fraud refers to the act of policy holder, the insured and beneficiary in the insurance contract relation violating the regulations of insurance law to illegally occupy as its purpose, adopt deliberately falsifying the subject matter of the insurance ; or cooking up the cause of an insured accident or overstating the extent of loss ; or inventing stories an insured accident that does not occur ; or deliberately causing the occurrence an insured accident that leads to property ; or deliberately making insurance accidents to swindle large sums of insurance. it has the characteristics as follows : their being subjectively in the diversity of the criminals, the combination of intelligence and cruelty of the criminals, simpler in criminal suspect ; their being objectively in deceptive, crime means " profession to turn, the crime activity concealment very strong, be involved amount of money huge, usually living with other crime companions, the severity of the consequences of the crime, higher black number of crime, and having a thing
筆者認為:保險詐騙罪的犯罪客體不屬于本罪的構成要件,保險詐騙罪的成立僅須具備犯罪主體要件、犯罪主觀要件和犯罪客觀要件三個要件即可;鑒于保險詐騙罪的預備形態在現實中的危害性不大,本文僅就保險詐騙罪的未遂形態和中止形態進行了探討;著重探討了保險詐騙罪共犯中的身份問題,對保險詐騙罪的教唆犯和幫助犯的構成特徵及刑事責任進行了探討;逐一對保險詐騙罪的實質一罪(法規競合與想像競合)和處罰一罪(牽連犯與吸收犯)進行了分析;同時,從犯罪數額和主觀目的上討論了保險詐騙罪的成罪條件,將保險詐騙罪與普通詐騙罪和合同詐騙罪進行了區分;最後,在對保險詐騙罪立法沿革和立法模式分析的基礎上,從保險詐騙罪的主體、主觀方面、客觀方面以及立法技術等幾個方面對保險詐騙罪的缺陷及其完善提出了自己的看法。The subjective aspect of instigation is " to have the intention to instigate someone to commit a crime ", namely the intention of instigation. the awareness factor of instigation means recognizing the instigatee ' s liability, the instigatee ' s lacking criminal intention and the instigating action ' s possibility to cause the instigatee to commit a crime. the will factor of instigation includes the attitude towards the instigatee ' s committing the crime and the attitude towards the harmful consequences brought by the crime instigated to committed, both of
教唆犯的意識因素包括對被教唆人刑事責任能力的認識,對被教唆人原先沒有犯罪意圖的認識,以及對自己行為將使被教唆人產生犯罪意圖並實施該犯罪的認識;教唆犯的意志因素包括其對被教唆人實施被教唆的犯罪的態度及對被教唆人接受教唆實施犯罪造成的危害結果的態度,這兩種態度都既可能是希望,也可能是放任;對于為陷害他人而教唆他人實施只能達于未遂的犯罪的教唆行為,在目前的情形下,應依教唆犯處理, .但若刑法對此類行為予以明確規定,尤其是在刑法分則中將其規定為獨立的罪名,則更為可取。Serious offenders, including, for example, murderers, robbers, members of criminal gangs, instigators of crime, habitual criminals who continue to pass on their criminal skills to others while being reformed or educated through labour, traders in human beings and proprietors of brothels, should be arrested and prosecuted without fail, reformed through labour or severely punished according to law
對嚴重刑事犯罪分子,包括殺人犯、搶劫犯、流氓犯罪團伙分子、教唆犯、在勞改勞教中繼續傳授犯罪技術的慣犯,以及人販子、老鴇兒等,必須堅決逮捕、判刑,組織勞動改造,給予嚴厲的法律制裁。Traditional theories of criminal laws of foreign countries have opposite views on joint negligence offense, some deny the existence of joint negligence offense on the basis of theory of offense in common ; some approve the existence on the basis of theory of behavior in common
對于過失教唆犯和過失幫助犯,筆者在介紹與評析相關學說的基礎上,對過失教唆犯和過失幫助犯的成立予以肯定。同時對過失共同犯罪的刑事責任問題提出了自己的觀點。Anyone who instigates a person under the age of 18 to commit a crime shall be given a heavier punishment
教唆不滿十八周歲的人犯罪的,應當從重處罰。If the instigated person does not commit the instigated crime, the instigator may be given a lesser punishment or a mitigated punishment
如果被教唆的人沒有犯被教唆的罪,對于教唆犯,可以從輕或者減輕處罰。Any aider and abettor in such offence is also liable to criminal prosecution
任何協助或教唆他人觸犯此等罪行的人士,亦可遭刑事檢控。But the explanation is limited, so the subjective elements of crime are not status. the conception of status in chinese penal code is that the legal and special individual factor. the statuses in the penal code have the character of law, responsibility personality and durative compare to other status
復數之行為人如果均具有構成要件所規定的特殊資格或條件,而參與身份犯之教唆、幫助或共同實施的,不論該犯罪為純正身份犯或不純正身份犯,參與者均可以構成身份犯之廣義共犯,對其定罪量刑沒有疑義。分享友人