校勘的 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [jiàokānde]
校勘的 英文
collative
  • 校 : 校名詞1. （學校） school 2. （校官） field officer3. （姓氏） a surname
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 校勘 : emendation; collate校勘學 textual criticism
  1. His poetical works are comprehensible and generally welcomed. however, the comments concerning how his poetry were compiled and how they spreaded, are incomplete. this thesis will reveal the true relations among zheng gu ’ s poetry anthology editions by emending all his anthology editions and his poems scattered in other florilegiums and referring to bibliothecas and other material

    今通過校勘國內現存各種版本鄭谷別集與散見于總集、選集及其他文獻中所收鄭谷詩，結合官私書目中鄭谷詩集的著錄情況，並參考歷代詩話、筆記及今人研究成果，試圖揭示鄭谷詩集之版本源流及傳承關系。
  2. On shen jiaben ' s collating methods of legal literature

    論沈家本校勘法律文獻的方法
  3. On lu xun ' s his great contribution to collation science

    試論魯迅對校勘學的貢獻
  4. On the emendation thoughts of mr. zhang shunhui

    張舜徽先生的校勘學思想探析
  5. The paper suggests that there are emendations of nine interpunctions in three scholars ' annotation to historical records published by zhonghua publishing house

    摘要文章校勘了中華書局點校本《史記》三家注部分的標點訛誤凡九條。
  6. And efforts have also been tried, at the viewpoint of the history of academic studies, to give accounts of and comments on the various specific subjects including philology, phonology, critical interpretation of ancient texts, bibliography, edition study, textual criticism, false detecting, compiling, note, nomenclature, institution, epigraphy, official rank, geomancy, taboo, astronomy, mathematics and temperament, etc., from which to extract the academic consciousness, mothed and achievements of the scholars in qianlong ( ) and jiaqing ( ) period

    本文也試圖對眾多的專門學科如文字、音韻、訓詁、目錄、版本、校勘、辨偽、輯伙、注釋、名物、典章、金石、職官、輿地、避諱、天文、歷算、樂律等學做出學術史的描述與評價，從中提煉出乾嘉學人的學術意識、方法以及人文成就。
  7. So ， this dissertation focused on these main ways of traditional chinese philology ， such as the ways of philology ， phonology and exegetics ， and basing on the particularity of medicine documents ， summed up roundly a system of the ways of anhui - school plain - ology about collating and exegetics of suwen ( 素 問 ) from five angles - the way of distinguishing the forms ， the way of discussing the pronunciations ， the way of explaining the meanings ， the way of collation ， the way of explaining the medical principles ， and by comparing it with the exegetic school ， made a farther summarization to the characteristics of the collative school from such ways - the style of study ， the spirit of study and the way of study ， etc

    論文從五個角度全面歸納了皖派樸學《素問》校詁的方法體系:辨形方法、考音方法、釋義方法、校勘方法、釋醫理方法。在比較「注釋派」的基礎上，本文從治學風格、治學精神、治學方法諸方面，進一步總結了校詁派的獨到特色。第四，中國學術史上的「漢宋之爭」是形成《素問》校詁派與注釋派的重要學術背景因素。
  8. The people who studied neijing ( 內 經 ) historieally can be classified as two sorts ? the exegetes in collation and exegetes in commentaries of medicine books. the former such as duanyucai ( 段 玉 裁 ) 、 hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孫 詒 讓 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ), who belonged to anhui school of the experts in plain - ology ， paid their attentions to textual researeh for contextual contents as their style of study ， and the latter sueh as wangbing ( 王 冰 ) 、 wukun ( 吳 昆 ) 、 zhangjiebin ( 張 介 賓 ) 、 mashi ( 馬 蒔 ) 、 zhangzhicong ( 張 志 聰 ) ， who all were famous physicians ， paid their attentions to the explaining of medical principles as their style of study. a famous professor of the conteeporary era ， qianchaochen ( 錢 超 塵 ) ， pointed out clearly that there are two schools in the exegetical history of neijing ( 內 經 ) - the collative school and the exegetic school. but up to date ， in the field of chinese medicine ， the collative school has been short of being studied. this dissertation mainly study the collative school ， and select suwen ( 素 問 ) collative school ， which is consisted of hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孫 詒 讓 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ), as the object to discuss the far - reaching influence of plain - ology to the study of medical documents

    歷史上研究《內經》的群體主要有兩大類:校勘訓詁家類和醫學注釋家類。前者以段玉裁、胡澎、俞樾、孫詒讓、于鬯等皖派樸學家為核心力量，治學風格上偏於文理的考證;後者以王冰、吳昆、張介賓、馬蒔、張志聰等醫學大家為主要代表，治學風格上偏於醫理的解釋。當代著名醫學文獻研究專家錢超塵則明確提出了「校詁派」與「注釋派」兩大派別概念。
  9. Then ， in order to open out the difference of the ways of their study between the collative school and the exegetic school ， we have introduced 53 typical cases of textual research ， which separately belong to five parts - distinguishing the forms ， discussing the pronunciations ， explaining the meanings ， collation ， explaining the medical principles ， in the latter part of dissertation ， and introduced every case by the order - [ original text ] [ collation and exegesis of past years ] [ textual research of anhui school ] [ commentary ]

    論文下篇則選擇了53例典型的考證釋例，分辨形例、考音例、釋義例、校勘例、釋醫理例五個部分，逐條按原文、歷代校注、皖派考釋、評析進行介紹，以展示「校詁派」與「注釋派」的治學方法的差異。
  10. Mr. chen yuan ' s contributions to textual criticism

    陳垣先生對校勘學的貢獻
  11. This paper expounds the accomplishment of the study of ancient books edition at that time from the study of same book with different edition, collating activities, edition scholars and the symbolic achievements in this field

    論文從同書異本、校勘活動、版本學家和標志性成果四個方面，論述了當時古籍版本學的成就。
  12. Nowadays, there are two popular editions on the market - - one guided and checked by zhang chenshi ( the china press, published in 1986 ), and the other by meng zhaogeng and sun shuqi ( shanghai ancient books press, published in 1987 ), two of which all absorbed the research results of our forefathers, achieved considerable successes in terms of the emendation and adjustment to jiankang shilu, and provide great convenience for scholars all over the world to study and make use of this book

    目前通行之本有張忱石點校本（中華書局1986年版）和孟昭庚、孫述圻等點校本（上海古籍出版社1987年版）兩種，二者吸收了前人的研究成果，在《建康實錄》的校勘整理方面取得了相當可觀的成績，為天下學人研究與利用《建康實錄》提供了極大的方便。
  13. Thus, dongpo su gong tie is without doubt the finest extant example of su shi ' s calligraphy and is of inestimable value for studying his opus and the history of the study of rubbings

    因此，東坡蘇公帖碑無論在保存東坡書跡方面，還是于蘇軾詩賦校勘研究方面，都具有重要的價值，也是帖學研究中應該關注的重要對象。
  14. The first part is the introduction of the finding and character of the wall plate. then the second is about the time of the plate and he agrees with the idea for the term of gongwang of zhou dynasty. the third part is to explain the problem of the copy of the wall plate and appreciate the different edits. the last part is to compare the metal characters with the literal material and its notes

    本文第一部分介紹了墻盤的出土與形質，第二部分評述了有關墻盤的年代問題，支持墻盤為共王時器的觀點，第三部分主要說明墻盤拓本問題，作了簡單的校勘，並評定各本的優劣。本文的最後一部分是將墻盤銘文與傳世文獻互相印證，糾正傳世文獻及其注釋的錯誤。
  15. A distinguish to four storeroom books abstract, shi shuo xin yu " s notes and commentaries, are his representative works. he was good at using edition and textual criticism etc. knowledge to identify historical events and materials and steive to recover history true feature. because textual research " s object is ancient books, ancient books had different style and easy to cause all kinds of questions which would effect correct understanding. so, in a work of ancient books stylistic rules and layout, he studied ancient books style from the view of true and false, name, compile, appendix, inside section and outside section of book 4 to use story to explain problem. what he said is quote copiously from many sources, and gave a minute description

    余嘉錫在考據學方面亦有重大的成就， 《四庫提要辨證》 、 《世說新語箋疏》等書就是他在這方面的代表作。他擅長運用版本、校勘等知識對史乎、史料進行認真而細致的考據，力求還歷史以本來面目。岡為考據對象多為占書，而且古書體例不一，易出現各種問題，影響人們對書中內容的理解，為此，他寫成了《古書通例》一書，從宏觀的角度研究古書體例，對古侈的真偽、命名、編定、附益以至書分內外篇和諸子書中用故事說明觀點等問題，旁徵博引，詳加解釋，對學術史貢獻極大，這是當肘許多學者所不及的。
  16. The content of lushi - chunqiu ' s annotations by gao you is extremely affluent. definition, pronunciation, verification, collation etc, which comprising the most important part of the gao ' s annotation, while definition is the core of it

    高誘注《呂氏春秋》的內容極為豐富，其中釋義、標音、考證、校勘等內容構成了高注的最主要部分，而釋義部分是其注的核心內容。
  17. Collating lingshu classics according rhyme

    的依韻校勘
  18. Collating and interpretation are the two most basic primary tasks in the study of excavated documents

    摘要校勘與考釋是整理出土文獻的兩項基本工作。
  19. This paper will dwell upon the special study on it from the angle of documentation > xun gu xue ( critical interpretation of ancient texts ) ^ edition and collation, along with the concern to the contrastive study between zhan guo ce annotated by gaoyou and zhanguo zongheng / ia shu copied on silks

    本論文主要從文獻學、訓詁學、版本、校勘的角度對高誘注作專題研究，同時也涉及到高注《戰國策》與帛書《戰國縱橫家書》的比較研究。
  20. The whole body of the dissertation is divided into four parts : 1, preface. telling the writing motives, the main problems existing in < < annotations > > and our collating rules

    一、前言：主要述及本文的寫作動機、 《釋文》存在的主要問題及我們校勘的原則。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書