權利代位原則 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [quánlìdàiwèiyuánzé]
權利代位原則
英文
principle of subrogation- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 代 : Ⅰ動詞1 (代替) take the place of; be in place of 2 (代理) act on behalf of; acting Ⅱ名詞1 (歷...
- 位 : Ⅰ名詞1 (所在或所佔的地方) place; location 2 (職位; 地位) position; post; status 3 (特指皇帝...
- 原 : Ⅰ形容詞1 (最初的; 原來的) primary; original; former 2 (沒有加工的) unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞(原...
- 則 : Ⅰ名詞1 (規范) standard; norm; criterion 2 (規則) regulation; rule; law 3 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ...
- 權利 : rightinterest
-
The author considers the legal system of intellectual property right is opening so that the domain name should be included as a kind of independent right. in the following parts of the essay, the author explores the fundamental causes of conflict and re - classifies the types of conflict between domain name and trademark, reanalyzes the similarity and the difference between domain name and trademark, makes comparison between the three major domain name dispute resolutions that have already been provided ( udrp, acpa and the domain name disputes solution of china ), it can provide ground for an effective method for solution. at last, the thesis baldly points out that it should stand an independent legal status in ip law
故,筆者欲突破在商標及商標法框架下研究域名的思維定勢,重新審視域名法律地位、分析其法律屬性;以域名與商標沖突為典型,研究導致沖突的原因;從平等中立的角度,以貫穿經典案例的方法重新劃分沖突分類:以橫向比較分析的研究方法評介全球具有代表性的沖突解決方案和我國新的域名政策以及司法解釋,為正確提出解決方案建立基礎;探討域名爭議解決的主要原則,分析域名在我國的立法模式;最後,筆者將在全文分析的基礎上,嘗試提出域名權利問題,以期能從根本上尋求解決域名的法律保護以及沖突的公平解決的合理機制。In modern company system, the shareholders " equity is the core content of capability architecture. however, the modern company administrative structure based on the “ the property is separated with the management ”, which leads to the shareholders acquiring much less management information of the company than the directorate, and the directorate controlling the company
然而,現代公司法「所有權與經營權相分離」的公司治理原則,使股東對公司經營信息的掌握處於弱勢地位,這就為董事(會)利用其優勢地位侵蝕股東權利、損害股東利益創造了條件。The author takes the views that conservatism is the representation of protecting and balancing the benefit of the proprietors of the property rights of accounting information, conservatism convention is the outcome of the institutional change of the property rights of accounting information, the inspiration of conservatism ' s innovation comes from the institutional change of the property rights of accounting information and its innovation, moreover, from the perspectives of the theory of agent - principal, since the choosing of conservative accounting polices must be provided with some economic consequences, the pursuing of economic benefits by different properties makes conservatism has its realistic conditions and objective factors that make it exist
本文經過論證認為:謹慎性原則是保護和均衡會計信息各產權主體利益的重要體現,謹慎性慣例的產生是會計信息產權制度變遷的產物,其發展動因來自於會計信息產權制度的變遷及其發展變革;另外,從委託代理理論的角度來看,在信息不對稱的現實情況下,謹慎性會計政策的選擇必然會具有一卜加沈運學院mi :學位淪上摘真定的經濟後果,各個利益關系主體對于相關利益的追求使得謹慎性原則有了其存在的現實條件或客觀因素。On the basis of the principal of traditional civil and commercial law, by the way of researching on the related legal systems of different countries and regions and relavant conventions and rules comparatively, using for reference of theories and ideas of the law and economics reasonably, this aticle clarifys the concept of international multimodal transport, making analysis of the legal status of multimodal transport operator, freight forwarder and terminal operator and the legal relationship between them and the cargo party. simultaneously, the paper mainly studies the liability regime of the multimodal transport operator and the uniformity thereof. finally, the paper designs the preliminary legal framework of the liability regime of multimldal transport operator of china and it is hoped to be beneficial to study and improve the liability regime of international multimodal transport operator
本文從傳統民商法的基本原理出發,對世界各國和地區相關法律制度以及現有公約與規則採用比較分析的方法,同時合理借鑒法律經濟學的相關理論和觀點,對國際貨物多式聯運予以界定,對國際貨物多式聯運經營人與貨運代理人、港站經營人的法律地位,他們之間以及他們與貨物利益方之間的權利義務關系進行分析,並在此基礎上著重對貨物多式聯運的核心法律問題,即多式聯運經營人責任制度進行研究,並對國際貨物多式聯運經營人責任制度的統一進行探討,最後本文提出我國多式聯運經營人責任制度的初步法律框架,希望能對國際以及我國多式聯運經營人責任制度的研究和完善有所助益。Principle of subrogation
權利代位原則On the basis of comparing the relative provisions of cmc and cil, according to the basic theories of contract law, insurance law and marine insurance law, by reference to the marine insurance act, 1906, laws in some other countries and clauses of marine insurance contract, the author analyzes in this paper the provisions of definition of marine insurance contract, disclosure, warranty, principle of indemnity, double insurance, subrogation, and modification, transfer and cancellation of marine insurance contract as well as rights and duties of the insurer and the insured. the author points out those provisions which are either duplicate, imperfect or reasonable in cmc and cil, draws the conclusion which provisions shall be deleted, which provisions shall be modified and, if so, how they shall be modified
本文以比較《海商法》與《保險法》相關規定為基礎,結合合同法、保險法和海上保險法的基本理論,適當參照英國《 1906年海上保險法》及其他一些國家的規定,並適當參考海上保險合同條款,對我國《海商法》海上保險合同的規定是否應引入投保人的概念,如何規定海上保險合同的定義,告知義務,保證義務,損失補償原則,重復保險,保險人的代位求償權,海上保險合同的變更、轉讓與解除,以及保險人和被保險人的權利義務等問題,進行了詳細深入的研究,分析了《海商法》相關規定與《保險法》的重復之處、規定不完善之處以及規定合理之處,並在此基礎上,進一步分析了哪些規定應當刪除,哪些規定應當修改以及如何修改。This article from the exercising area of subrogation, comparative law, litigation economy, the social effect of subrogation exercising, the restriction on the debtor ' s right and equality of creditors ' right, proves that the direct - discharge is more excellent than the rule of warehousing through nine different angles of view
本文從代位權的行使范圍、比較法學、訴訟經濟、行使代位權可能產生的社會效果、對債務人處分權利的限制以及債權平等多個視角對兩種學說進行考量,力證直接受償原則優于入庫原則。The contemporary civil procedural law sets up the principle of good faith because of the following reasons : it possesses the characteristics, which the basic principle of the civil procedural law should have, and three functions, with which it can prevent the rights of action and trial from being abused, uniquely explain the statutory law, and supplement the missing meaning of it. the principle is the result of adjustment and influence by the concept of the rights in the standard of society and the idea of action
現代民事訴訟法確立誠信原則的法律依據如下:它具有民事訴訟法基本原則應有的屬性和三大功能,其獨特的防止訴權和審判權的濫用,解釋成文法和規定欠缺的補充功能不可替代,是民事訴訟程序公正價值目標要求,社會本位權利思想及訴訟理念調整影響的結果,是現代公法與私法的融合、實體法和程序法相互彌補的產物。分享友人