歸責性 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [guīzéxìng]
歸責性
英文
accountability-
It consists of eight parts : from part one to part six the following are analysis and studies such as the definition and scope of products both at home and abroad, the definition and norms of judgement of the product defects, the imputation principle of pl, the subject of pl, the pl cause of counterplea, the compensation for damages of pl. etc. in part seven is a brief comparison between responsibility of quote and lawsuit limitation. and a conclusion is drawn from the above seven parts which will gives us some ideas about what we should learn and what will make it perfect for our pl
第一部分至第六部分依次就中外產品責任法中產品的定義和范圍、產品缺陷的定義和判斷標準、產品責任的歸責原則、產品責任主體、產品責任的抗辯事由、產品責任的損害賠償進行了比較研究並就以上各方面我國產品責任立法必須完善之處分別在各部分進行了闡述；第七部分就產品責任訴訟中的舉證責任和訴訟時效進行了簡略的比較；結語部分就上述七部分我國產品責任法的可供借鑒之處和完善進行了結論性的綜述。There are three stepwise stages of the procedure of the dispute solution, which includes the decision of engineers, the dab and the arbitration. chinese contractors shall take actions to protect their benefits. these actions includes the careful analysis on the claims and the strict managements of contracts, the well understanding of the contracts, especially the terms that exculpatory clause of the employers, then following of the procedure and catching the very chance to bring about claims
文章指出索賠是國際工程合同中的一種具有補償性的、非常講究時效和書面證據的歸責方式，承包商可分別基於工程變更、僱主違約、風險因素或合同瑕疵等原因對發包商提出索賠請求，工程師決定、 dab爭端裁決和仲裁是解決索賠爭端的三種遞進的基本程序，中國承包商應從採取充分論證索賠權，準確識別索賠機會，熟悉合同文件、嚴格管理合同，充分認知僱主的免責條款、切實遵守索賠程序等多個方面維護自身的利益。Compared innocent actors with innocent injured parties, the former should be more imputed and take the responsibility
由於「無辜的行為人」比「無辜的受害人」更具可歸責性，故應對前者歸責。This part gives discussion and makes statement about the principle of certainty, guarantee right, distinguishment and independence, which are all related to the construction of civil liability in security transaction. the principle of certainty mainly refers that civil liability in security transaction must hare clear definite
確定原則主要是指證券交易民事責任要具有確定性，在民事責任的設定中必須明確規定違法行為、責任主體、歸責原則、損失計算方法、責任形式等。With the thought of " economic priority ", government always neglect the protection of the environmental rights. as we know, environmental civil litigation, one of litigation remedies, only deal with the conflicts between individuals, which can not play a role in directly supervisory the public powers, while one of the aims of administrative litigation is to superintend the administrative actions. so we must pay attention to the study of the environmental administrative litigation
但是民事的救濟具有事後性、個別性的特點，不能對將要發生的環境危害及早預防控制，也不能對跨越相當大范圍的區域的環境污染進行控制，所以在環境危機日益深化的今天，環境管理成為了環境保護的最主要的手段，當今各國環境質量的好壞，很大程度上可以歸功于或者歸責于政府行政主管部門。The theories include : character of the employer ' s duty, namely it is the impinging rights " duty, not contract duty ; principles of the employer ' s returning responsibility, namely it exists the engage relation between the employer and the employee, and the reason of employee ' s hurt is happened in the scope of implementing principleship and is the enterprise ' s trouble, and also four important terms of the employer not being dismissed the duty
包括：僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的性質，即這種責任為侵權責任，而非契約責任；僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的歸責原則，即為無過錯歸責原則；僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的構成，即僱主與雇員之間存在雇傭關系、雇員是在執行職務范圍內受害、企業事故是雇員損害的原因以及僱主須沒有免責事由四個要件。In contrast, the author believes that it is unreasonabie that the carrier have immunity from the fault of his crew under up - todate navigation condition. the author will justify his opinion by ; ( 1 ) discussing the history of liabiiity basis system and the evoiution of its civii iaw standardi the iiabiiity basis system experienced objective distribution stage to subjective stage, which indicates the negation of subjective f8ult
本文將從以下幾個方面進行論述： （一）分析歸責原則的發展歷程、民法基本觀念（即民法的本位）的演進，從宏觀的法律原理方面抽象論證航海過失免責的非正當性；歸責原則從客觀歸責到主觀歸責的發展，表明人類對主觀過錯的否定，雖然在意思自治原則下出現了一些過失免責，但各國都對此給以了限制。By the analysis of the actors, infringing object, principles, the scope of liability, nature function and methods of damages, etc., the thesis proposes the necessity of constructing and improving this system, and makes further discussion and argument
文章從行為主體、侵犯客體、歸責原則、責任范圍、賠償性質、功能和賠償方式、標準等方面進行分析，提出了完善、構建這一制度的觀點，並逐一進行探討和論證。But in the theory field, the systematical and deeply research is not given, so the application of the rule of foreseeability appears the hazy and confused in the judicial practice. according to many questions about the rule in theory, the thesis expounds the theoretical development and legal values of this rule at first. then the thesis discusses about the theoretical composition of the rule, and holds the delinquent party should foresee that the range of compensation of damages is the damages caused by his breaking contract when he negotiates a contract. finally separately discusses on the relationship between the rule of foreseeability and the principle of complete compensation, between the rule and the doctrine of liability fixation for breach of contract, between the rule and the theory of causal relationship
然而，理論界對可預見性規則尚缺乏系統、深入的研究，導致在司法實踐中對該制度運用時的迷茫和混亂。針對可預見性規則的諸多理論問題，本文首先對可預見性的理論發展、法理價值進行了闡述;其後就可預見性規則的理論構成進行了探討，認為違約一方在合同締結之時預見或應當預見到的因違約造成的損害為其損害賠償的范圍;最後對可預見性規則與完全賠償原則、違約歸責原則和因果關系理論的關系作了探討，認為可預見性規則存在的積極意義在於合理限制違約損害賠償范圍。Although our criminal law has already announced that the drunk criminal should undertake penal responsibility, the peculiarity of the drunk crime leads to the conflict of the imputation of the drunk criminal and the traditional theory on penal responsibility, thus leading to the problem of lacking theoretical basis to punish the drunk crime
雖然刑法已明確規定醉酒的人犯罪應當負刑事責任，但由於醉酒犯罪行為的特殊性，導致了對醉酒犯罪人歸責問題上與傳統刑事責任理論的沖突，從而產生了處罰醉酒犯罪理論依據不足的問題。Chapter 2, centering on the particularity of securities misrepresentation in the following aspects : categories, natures, litigants, causation, imputation principles and civil liability undertaking ways, etc, introduces systematically the basic theory of the civil compensation for tort damages caused by misrepresentation in stock markets, which forms the dissertation ' s theoretical foundation
第二部分：圍繞證券虛假陳述行為在其行為類型、性質、當事人、因果關系、歸責原則、民事責任承擔方式等方面，系統闡述了證券市場虛假陳述民事損害賠償基本理論。這是本文的理論基礎。On the other hand, the basis of liability, the rule of allocation of liability, the exemption circumstances and the special characteristics of shipping operation together with other substantial aspects in maritime law are different from civil law, which leads to the existence of distinguishing principles in marine cargo claims
另一方面，海商法作為民法的特別法，海事實體法中的責任基礎、歸責原則、免責事項、以及航運實務的特點決定了海運貨損索賠舉證責任又有著區別於一般民事舉證責任的特殊性。The only few legal provisions concerning the civil liability is essentially useless due to lack of feasibility. for the above reasons, to conduct study on some basic issues concerning the civil liability of certified public accountants, such as the nature of civil liability, review standard of false audit report, standard of duty of certified public accountants, burden of proof, etc, is important legal means to effectively resolve t
僅有的關於民事責任的法律規定操作性極其差，形同虛設，因此，開展對注冊會計師民事法律責任的基礎性問題，如民事責任性質、虛假報告鑒定標準、歸責原則、舉證責任設置、民事賠償制度等的研究，是有效解決虛假陳述問題的重要法律手段。To join the international convention in practice does not necessarily conform to china ' s national conditions. thus, as soon as the ship built in conformity with china ' s national conditions accidental discharge pollution damages the legal system is imperative. this article is based on the foregoing, the use of available research and advanced foreign experience to the legislative study
本文討論了船舶事故性排放造成油污損害賠償立法中的權利主體、義務主體、賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任等問題，對于船舶事故性排放造成油污損害賠償的相關法律問題進行了分析並提出立法建議，期望對完善該方面立法有所裨益。They include assumption of the risk, borrowed servant and captain of the ship doctrines, comparative negligence, contributory negligence, good samaritan laws, intervening cause, statute of limitations in the u. s.
其墓本含義與美國是相似的，只是四要素說更強調過失的主觀心理的可歸責性In chapter three, i introduce contract for securities investment consultancy, securities brokerage contract and securities sale contract, and make preliminary investigations on doctrine of liability fixation and important constructive conditions etc. in chapter four, i make a research on the fulfillment system of civil liability of security through civil litigation, and make a suggestion that china should introduce class action system from usa
對各種具體的證券侵權行為從行為的特徵、責任主體、請求權人、責任的構成等方面進行分析研究，以使對問題的探討具有一定的深度、可操作性。對于證券違約責任，簡要介紹了幾種典型的證券合同，如證券投資咨詢合同、證券經紀合同、證券買賣合同，對證券違約責任的歸責原則、構成要件等進行了嘗試性的探討。Third, the author probed into the value of responsibility system for the shortage, such as order, impartiality, sureness and efficiency, and such values interrelationship. part three is about shareholders responsibility in public law, for the shortage of capital contribution. the author made a brief discussion about the difference between the responsibility in public law and the responsibility in civil law
文中，以我國現行立法為重點，對于出資瑕疵股東對足額出資股東的責任、出資瑕疵股東對公司的責任、出資瑕疵股東對公司債權人的責任、足額出資股東的資本充實責任、公司首任董事的擔保責任從責任性質、構成要見、歸責原則、責任內容等方面進行了分析和探討。According to securities law of our country, civil subjects assuming the civil lialility of stock cheating include : issuers, initiators ; issuers " directors, supervisors and managers holding responsible ; securities underwriters and directors, supervisors and managers thereof holding responsible, accountant office, assets valuation agencies, law firms and other specialties originations and people thereof being responsible
第四部分重點闡述證券欺詐民事責任的構成要件和歸責原則。本章主要從證券欺詐民事責任的行為違法性、損害事實、因果關系、過錯和歸責原則、免責事由等幾方面加以敘述。 （一）行為違法性及其具體表現和認定。Finally analyze by the means of economic analysis of law how the road traffic participators will act in different road traffic accidents responsibility principles, the influence on social welfare from different responsibility principles and the superior and shortcoming of the strict responsibility principle, give advice on how to improve it
最後，運用法經濟學的方法分析了機動車與非機動車、行人之間發生的道路交通事故適用不同的歸責原則對道路交通主體行為模式產生的影響，以及不同的歸責原則對社會福利水平的影響，並分析了嚴格責任原則的優越性和不足之處，提出了改進建議。It is not right to say generally which relation should be protected. to answer that, the behavior party who caused the appearing fact is to be judged whether he is responsible, and as for the opposite party and the third party, they are to be judged whether they have the reliable interests to protect
保護那一個民事法律關系，不能一概而論，對于造成表見事實的行為人來講，要看他是否有歸責性，對于相對人和第三人來講，應當是否有信賴利益可以保護。分享友人