法律的推理 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [fǎlǜdetuīlǐ]
法律的推理 英文
analogy of law
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 律 : Ⅰ名1 （法律; 規則） law; rule; statute; regulation 2 （律詩的簡稱） short for lüshi 3 （姓氏） a ...
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 推 : 動詞1 （向外用力使物體移動） push; shove 2 （磨或碾） turn a mill or grindstone; grind 3 （剪或削...
  • 理 : Ⅰ名詞1 （物質組織的條紋） texture; grain （in wood skin etc ） 2 （道理;事理） reason; logic; tru...
  • 法律 : law; statute法律保護 legal protection; 法律程序 legal procedure; 法律承認 de jure recognition （...
  • 推理 : [邏輯學] inference; ratiocination; illation; reasoning; ratiocinate
  1. Legal logic is useful in the processes of commanding legal concept, using legal concept, upbuilding and grasping proposition logically and carrying on legal reasoning accordingly, and doing logic reasoning for the legal arbitrament and legal ideas which are to be made

    法律邏輯有助於準確掌握和運用法律概念，合乎邏輯地建立和把握命題並進行法律推理，對即將作出的法律裁決或法律意見進行邏輯論證。
  2. Secondly, my paper discusses the basic process of legal reasoning

    接下來，本文討論了法律推理的基本過程。
  3. Here the big premises mainly consists of statue and case law

    法律推理的大前提主要有制定法和判例。
  4. In preparing his brief he gave only two pages to conventional legal reasoning and citation of precedents.

    他在準備辯護狀時，僅用兩紙進行通常的法律推理和援引判例。
  5. This dissertation takes feuerbachs meticulous logical structure as masterstroke, explains his whole deduction process, which from the conception of civil penalty to the theory of psychological coercion, again from law deterrence to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. and it also states that, feuerbach takes the external behavior for condemnatory object, obviates the intervention of sentiment, abandons moral punishment or moral principles, moreover, excludes judiciary arbitrariness by means of law restriction, besides, emphasizes law deterrence and creates the theory of psychological coercion, and as a result establishes the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime

    本文以費爾巴哈嚴謹縝密的邏輯結構為主線，梳理了其從市民刑罰概念的構築到心理強制說的提出、再到確定刑罰法規中法律威懾思想的確立直至罪刑法定主義原則的整個推論過程，闡釋了費爾巴哈把客觀的、外部的行為作為處罰的對象，排除情操的介入，把法律置於可罰性的絕對根據之中，擯棄道德性刑罰或道德性原理，通過把法官約束在法律之中的方式排斥了法官的恣意專斷，又強調法律的威懾，創立心理強制說，從而確立了罪刑法定主義的刑法思想。
  6. On defeasible reasoning in law

    法律中的可辯駁推理
  7. You may travel or attain a higher education, deal with legal principles, teach a class dealing with religion or philosophy, and editorialize, promote, or bring understanding to difficult situations

    你可能會走向或得到關於法律原則的高等教育，講授關于宗教或哲學的課，編輯，推銷，或者對困難形勢的理解力。
  8. Article two state - owned enterprises ' utilizing of foreign investment for reshuffling, primarily means that state - owned enterprises ' utilizing direct foreign investment to annex other domestic enterprises ( hereinafter annexation projects ), to complement self - owned floating assets ( hereinafter complement projects ) and to reimburse enterprise debts ( hereinafter reimbursement projects )

    第一條為了加強對國有企業利用外商投資進行資產重組的管理，切實貫徹「積極、合理、有效」利用外資的方針，維護國有資產權益，推動國有企業改革，根據《中華人民共和國中外合資經營企業法》 、 《中華人民共和國中外合作經營企業法》 、 《中華人民共和國外資企業法》及其他法律法規，制定本規定。
  9. As long as such accidents do not occur because of mistakes on the part of sic, under conditions not against the law, ticket holders shall waive damage claims, demands or law suits against sic, china auto sports association, fia, foa, fom, sponsors of f1 world championship, the 2004 china grand prix, other companies designated by sic and organizers, operators and promoters

    只要該等事故非上海國際賽車場有限公司過錯造成，並且在不違背法律的前提下，持票觀眾同意放棄或免除對上海國際賽車場有限公司、中國汽車運動聯合會、國際汽車運動聯合會（ fia ） 、一級方程式賽車行政管理有限公司（ foa ） 、一級方程式賽車管理公司（ fom ） 、 f1世界錦標賽2004年中國大獎賽賽事贊助商、其他上海國際賽車場有限公司指定的公司以及所有參與組織，運作，推廣賽事的人員因事故所發生的損失、損害等提出任何請求或訴訟。
  10. The third part of this article mainly discusses the causal relationship in market manipulation, which is a block of the enforcement of the law against market fraudulences. because market manipulation is a kind of special tort, the author agree on the use of the " proof to the contrary " theory to lighten the proof burden of the damaged party in causal relationship. besides, this part also discusses such issues as how to decide the scope of legal plaintiffs, how to assess the losses of the damaged party

    本文第三部分「操縱市場的因果關系研究」從民法一般的因果關系理論入手，並結合操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系的特殊性，論述了操縱市場的侵權行為中因果關系是否成立的判斷標準，並主張對因果關系在民事訴訟中舉證責任的分配應突破「法律要件分類說」的要求，適用因果關系舉證責任倒置的做法，即由操縱市場案件中的被告負擔證明責任成立因果關系不成立的舉證責任，否則即推定因果關系成立。
  11. Based on these defects, the article put forward some legal countermeasures to perfect the acclp for nine aspects in order to motive the acclp " s successful conduction. the nine aspects are : borrowing the western countries " acclp " s advanced experience ; building up the correct concept of acclp, decentralizing the high - centralized stockholder " s structure, re - distributing the power of company " s institutional framework and establishing the legal proceedings system during the stockholders in order to protect middle and little stockholder " s profits ; joint liability for guarder " s of the board and legal person " s personality deny system ; improving the framework of the board of directors ; perfecting the market mechanism

    在此基礎上，本文從借鑒發達國家公司法人治理結構的先進經驗；樹立公司法人治理結構的正確理念；分散高度集中的股權結構；重新配置公司內部權力結構；建立股東代表訴訟制度，保護中小股東的利益；建立監事（會）連帶賠償制度；建立公司法人人格否認制度；改善董事會結構；完善市場機制等九個方面提出了完善我國公司法人治理結構的法律措施，以便推動我國公司法人治理的順利進行。
  12. On the foundation of that, the paper took into discussion on how to perfect the legislation of the crime of significant accidents due to environmental pollution. the discussion was mainly on the requisites to constitute of the crime, the determination of the crime and the principles of how to punish the crime. at last the paper came into the conclusions : 1

    筆者寫作本文主要是出於對環境污染的憂慮，認為環境刑法作為法律的最後一道防線，應當在打擊犯罪，實現人類可持續發展的斗爭中發揮其應有的作用，本文雖然僅以重大環境污染事故罪為研究對象，但作者希望能夠以小見大，推而廣之，為我國環境刑法理論的完善盡一份微薄之力。
  13. Rechtgeshafteljunstic acts ), which was created by heise & hugo, has no counterpart in anglo - american legal system. it is praised highly in civil law system

    德國歷史法學派法學家創造的法律行為理論在大陸法系民法學倍受推崇。
  14. And from thence, from this common political community comes also our very intellectual faculty and reasoning faculty and our capacity for law ; or whence do they come

    由此出發，我們的智性能力、推理能力和制定法律的能力也來自這一公共政治共同體；否則它們來自何處？
  15. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  16. Legal reasoning presents mainly the features as followings : first, the thinking function of legal reasoning is argument reasoning. second, the thinking mode of legal reasoning on the whole belongs to " deductive demonstration mode ". third, the logic structure of legal reasoning is a combination of formal logic reasoning and argument reasoning

    作為法律實踐的論證方法，法律推理主要有以下特點：第一，法律推理的思維功能是論辯推理；第二，法律推理的總體思維模式屬于「演繹論證模式」 ；第三，法律推理的邏輯結構是形式邏輯推理與論辯推理的綜合運用；第四，法律推理的推理功能表現為一種實踐推理。
  17. Analogy of law

    法律的推理
  18. And in the computer - aided law agency, causal reasoning of legal rules is the core of the system and results can help lawyers have more efficient law documentation. the use of causation is one of basic intelligence for human beings

    在法律推理應用中，把法律條文表示成因果規則，按照所建立的因果模型進行有效的推理，作為計算機輔助法律事務所的核心系統。
  19. The development of international legal system in the future shall focus on the building of an effective legal mechanism which can not only improve the liberalization of international investment but also respect the permanent sovereignty over national resources and the basic economic rights of every country, this mechanism should not only be helpful for the protection of foreign direct investment and the improvement of treatment standards of foreign investors, but also should be helpful for the control of negative influence of trans - national corporations by the host states and the establishment of a new international economic order

    第二，法律框架的構造過多地依賴于以國內機制來協調跨國公司法律問題上的矛盾，不僅妨礙了統一法制的構築和推進，而且使跨國公司法律問題更加復雜，使得矛盾更加尖銳化。第三，對跨國公司在現代國際經濟生活中的作用存在認識上的分歧，制約了跨國公司的國際法制的統一化發展。總而一言之，只有運用現實主義的觀點，準確把握跨國公司在現代國際經濟生活中的積極、消極作用，才能為其國際法制的合理構築創造理念卜的根據。
  20. The axiom system of law theory insist : the reasoning of law science is the same as the one of natural science, one proposition is deduced from another proposition, the correctness of the first proposition depends on the correctness of the second proposition, the correctness of the second proposition depends on the third proposition, and so on

    法律的公理體系理論主張:法學的推理與自然科學推理的方式是相同的，都是由一個命題出發經過邏輯推理得出另一個命題。后一個命題的正確性取決於前一個命題的正確性，而前一個命題的正確性又取決于再前一個命題的正確性，一直可以追溯到一個不能再行追問的而必須被確認為真的命題? ?公理，而公理的正確性則取決于公眾的一致承認。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書