濫用專利權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [lànyòngzhuānlìquán]
濫用專利權
英文
abuse of patent- 濫 : 動詞(泛濫) overflow; flood; inundateⅡ形容詞(差的; 陳腐的) shoddy; hackneyed; stale; trite Ⅲ副...
- 用 : Ⅰ動詞1 (使用) use; employ; apply 2 (多用於否定: 需要) need 3 (敬辭: 吃; 喝) eat; drink Ⅱ名...
- 專 : Ⅰ動詞(獨自掌握和佔有) monopolize; take possession alone Ⅱ形容詞(集中在一件事上的) concentrate...
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 濫用 : abuse; misuse; use indiscriminately
-
On patent misuse in patent pool
美國專利權濫用規則的發展The third part gives relevant legislation suggestions and strategies in three aspects in the light of the shortages of demurring patent tort. these suggestions and strategies are : 1 ) constitute law of anti - monopolization imitating countries that have advanced legislation of intellectual property rights to prevent patentee from abusing his rights ; 2 ) smooth the way of administrative law execution of patent and delimit properly the bounds between administrative law execution and judicial review ; 3 ) strengthen imitational communication and academic discussion in demurring patent tort and increase the strength of being in line with the world
第三大部分是針對目前我國在專利侵權抗辯問題上存在的不足之處提出了三個方面的立法建議及對策,一是效仿知識產權立法先進國家制定一部反壟斷法,防止專利權人對其權利濫用;二是理順專利行政執法途徑,正確界定專利行政執法與司法審查之間的界限;三是加強專利侵權抗辯方面的國際交流與理論探討,加大與國際接軌的力度,充分利用國際條約,最大限度地保護我國的國家利益。Take the united states, european union as well as taiwan correlation rules and theories as a foundation, discussing the relationship among patent, industry standard and anti - competition
在知識經濟時代的產業結構下,以專利授權聯盟之銷售交易模式逐年遞增,使得專利權過度擴張或濫用,所牽涉到的反競爭問題受到關切。To peter gregory, the investigation tested the professionalism and integrity of the icac - a test they passed with flying colours : " the evidence was hidden behind huge volumes of complicated documents. investigators had to rack their brains to track every tiny detail, but were dauntless despite the possibility of confronting the rich and the powerful. the high social status of the suspects did nothing to dampen our commitment to see justice done
作為專案小組的主要成員,祁國利指出:本案罪證隱藏在大量文件當中,十分復雜和繁瑣,調查人員要費盡心力去挖掘,大家本著鍥而不舍和無畏權貴的精神,追查每一個細節,終能成功破案,對身居高位的受疑人亦秉公處理,絕不容許濫用職權,謀取私利。This text studies patent rights abusing and its control from three aspects
鑒于上述,本文從三個方面對專利權的濫用及其控制進行了探討。The most common type of misuse occurs when the patent holder uses the patent to violate the antitrust laws
最常見的濫用專利權常發生在專利權人利用其專利違反反壟斷法的時候。The most common type of misuse occcurs when the patent holder uses the patent to violate the antitrust laws
最常見的濫用專利權常發生在專利權人利用其專利違反反壟斷法的時候。At the same time, in order to prevent patentee from abusing patent and unlawfully exercising rights, a series of measures have been made in many aspects to restrict exertion of the right
同時,為了防止專利權人濫用專利權及其他不正當權利的行為發生,又從許多方面對該權利的行使規定了一系列的限制措施。Patent law has formed the mechanism that balances the different interest of the society, such as the patent right ca n ' t be abused etc. in fact, gene sequence patent extend industrial circles " monopoly right to bring them more interest
就一國內部來講,傳統專利法在調整利益關繫上的實踐中已形成了一種衡平機制,如對基礎理論不能壟斷、獲得的專利壟斷權不能超出其做出的貢獻、不能濫用專利權、對技術的進一步的開發、研究不能壟斷等。Immediately after, this article analyzed gains or losses of standardize, analyzed the two greatest irregularities because of standardize : standardize monopoly and international trade technical barrier. standardize monopoly comes from the abuse of patent right, because of the close relation between standardize and patent right. through the article listed a lot of examples, introduced the proceeding how enterprise abuse patent right to restrict competition
接著,分析了標準化的利弊,重點分析了標準化所產生的兩大弊端:標準化壟斷和國際貿易技術壁壘。由於標準化和專利權有著密切聯系,標準化壟斷基本上是由於專利權的濫用所產生的,詳細介紹了企業在標準化戰略中,如何濫用專利權限制競爭。From a microcosmic view, the article adopts analyzing methods of illustration, induction and comparison. at the same time, it exerts the logic reasoning rules, from small issues to large ones, from phenomena of a problem to its essences, as well as from construction of a specific patent claims to deduction of different systems for defending patent infringement claims. in addition, in consideration of the complexity and diversity of patent infringement defense systems, the article classifies and specifies them from different angles, and at the end of the article, conceives the future legislation pattern of china regarding patent infringement defense
第三章如何構建專利侵權抗辯制度體系著眼于權利要求解析,借鑒外國的先進立法和實務經驗,結合中國實際,將專利侵權抗辯制度系分為合同抗辯、訴訟時效抗辯、證據抗辯、訴訟主體資格抗辯、禁止反悔抗辯、濫用專利權抗辯、不侵權抗辯、不視為侵權抗辯、已有技術抗辯以及專利無效抗辯等十個具體制度,並側重於中國特色和專利特點兩個層面,對它們進行了深入探討和分析。Each country of the union shall have the right to take legislative measures providing for the grant of compulsory licenses to prevent the abuses which might result from the exercise of the exclusive rights conferred by the patent, for example, failure to work
本聯盟各國都有權採取立法措施規定授予強制許可,以防止由於行使專利所賦予的專有權而可能產生的濫用,例如:不實施。Yet intellectual property ' s legal monopolization is a decisive factor of franchisor ' s right in restricting franchisee ' s activities in their contract to some extent. at the same time, franchise also involves three parties of franchisor, franchisee, and other relevant competitors and includes competitive relation in terms of the horizontal and vertical levels. besides, a franchisor tends to use his advantages to abuse his rights, restricting competition against the anti - monopoly law such as tied selling, resale price maintenance and regional restrictions, when he signs a contract with a franchisor
因為特許經營與壟斷專營有相似之處,在特許經營中,特許人(或稱特許權人)通過特許經營合同將其所擁有的商標、商號、專利或專有技術等使用權授予被特許人,這就涉及到知識產權、產品銷售權、技術技巧等的轉讓,而知識產權本身的合法壟斷性質決定了特許人在特許經營合同中有權對被特許人的活動進行一定的限制;同時,特許經營又涉及特許人、被特許人和其他相關競爭者,包含橫向、縱向兩個層次的競爭關系,特許人與被特許人簽訂特許經營合同時,極有可能利用其優勢地位濫用特許權,做出搭售、維持轉售價格、區域限制等與反壟斷法相抵觸的限制競爭行為。Intellectual property, or ip ? in the form of patents and copyrights ? can help a company build market power, whereas antitrust law tries to tear that power down when its misuse results in a stifling of competition
以專利或版權形式存在的智慧財產,有助於公司佔有市場優勢,但如果智慧財產遭到濫用而阻礙競爭時,反托拉斯法就會介入,試著拔除虎爪。Patent abuse refers to the franchise rights for all in the process of reality beyond the normal limits or scope allowed by the law, leading to the improper exercise of the rights and legitimate interests of others or damage public interests
專利權濫用行為是指專利權的所有人在現實權利的過程中超越了正常的界限或法律所允許的范圍,導致該權利的不正當行使,損害他人正當利益或者社會公共利益的行為。In view of this situation, we should create our own franchise as soon as possible abuse control system, or as soon as possible to develop their own " anti - monopoly ", or in the revision of the " anti - unfair competition law " course will act as a patent misuse of improper competition into its adjustment range, or designate a separate legal regulations for the conduct of such abuse franchise system
針對這種情況,我國應盡快地構建自己的專利權濫用控制體系,或者盡快地制定出自己的《反壟斷法》 ,或者在修改《反不正當競爭法》的時候將專利權濫用的行為作為一種不正當競爭行為納入其調整范圍,或者指定出單獨的法律對專利權濫用這種行為進行規制。A third way is to establish that the patent holder has misused the patent
第三個方式是證實專利權人濫用專利。However, our current abuses of the patent did not pay sufficient attention 。 in recent years, many firms and foreign firms appear in newspapers between intellectual property disputes, such as the famous case of wenzhou lighter, dvd patent fee cases, cisco v. huawei cases, etc. at present, china ' s enterprises as a result of independent intellectual property rights have little, and a few developed countries have used the vast majority of the world intellectual property, so in order to protect intellectual property rights in the name of any intellectual property commodities such as patent products with legitimate trademark products, as well as the right to copyright books, records, computer software, imposed import restrictions ; possession or use of intellectual property advantages of unfair trade
但是,目前我國對專利權濫用行為的並沒有引起足夠的重視,近些年來,不少企業與外國企業之間的知識產權糾紛見諸報端,比如著名的溫州打火機案、 dvd專利收費案件、思科訴華為案件等等。目前,我國企業由於擁有的自主知識產權不多,而少數發達國家利用擁有世界上絕大多數知識產權,動輒以保護知識產權的名義,對含有知識產權的商品,如專利產品,貼有合法商標的產品,以及享有著作權的書籍、唱片、計算機軟體等實行進口限制;或者憑借擁有的知識產權優勢,實行不公平貿易。Misuse of a patent occurs when a patent holder uses the patent to achieve something illegally
當一個專利權人利用專利去非法的完成某些事時,專利濫用就發生了。First, the exclusiveness of copyright calls for absolute protection against any illegal transition and usage. to seek enormous profits, the owners of copyright tend to abuse the right of exclusiveness and handicap the development of literature and art. on the other hard, other individuals and the public eagerly claim to share the literature and art
首先,一方面,著作權的專有性和絕對性,意味著著作權排斥非權利人的不法復制、傳播、使用,因此,他為追求巨額利益而濫用專有權、遲滯文學藝術發展的危險性更大;而另一方面,同樣出於知識產品的巨大效益,其他個人或整個公眾要求享有作品的呼聲也呈增大的趨勢。分享友人