無締合性的 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [xìngde]
無締合性的 英文
unassociated
  • : 無Ⅰ動詞(沒有) not have; there is not; be without Ⅱ名詞1 (沒有) nothing; nil 2 (姓氏) a surn...
  • : formconclude
  • : 合量詞(容量單位) ge, a unit of dry measure for grain (=1 decilitre)
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (性格) nature; character; disposition 2 (性能; 性質) property; quality 3 (性別) sex ...
  • : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  1. For the treaty about the responsibility ' s quality, have four kind doctrine, is a deflect to say respectively, and the act of law say, and the direct provision of law say that say with honest repute, and the writer more incline toward the honest repute to say, quanta this is the treaty about negligence responsibility this a special stage solicit of, the parties steer the activity relating to civil law the hour to must have the heart of bona fides the status, other doctrine all some lead long strong, treaty about of occasion, traditional standpoint it is an acknowledge concordat that negligence responsibility establish does not establish, void or reversed occasion

    對于約責任質,有四種學說,分別是侵權行為說,法律行為說,法律直接規定說和誠實信用說,筆者更傾向于誠實信用說,因為這是約過失責任這一特殊階段要求,當事人進行民事活動時必須具備誠實善良內心狀態,其他學說都有些牽強。對于約過失責任成立,傳統觀點是只承認同不成立、效或被撤銷。筆者認為也應包括同成立,因為他同時也侵犯了非違約方固有利益,雖然這部分利益不佔重點,但我們不能否認她們存在,比如標物有瑕疵,約人違反保證等。
  2. Basically, the optimal transaction rules or institutions that could be designed or arranged are confined to legally enforceable formal contracts, and never involve those informal contracts, e. g. morality, culture and social customs. however, formal contracts and informal contracts are substitutive and complementary in solving asymmetric information problems

    從理論上講,論是最優契約安排還是約環境設計,所規劃只能是那些在法律上具有可執行正式同或正式制度,並不包括以道德、習俗等方式存在非正式約,因為非正式約都是不能為契約設計所左右外生變量。
  3. Surveying the theories and practice all over the world, the countries such as german insist on contract responsibility according to providing contract by silent information and protecting the third party. however, america and england tend to infringement responsibility, because they think there is n ' t strict contract relations between accounting and the third party, and cpa against the liability stipulated in advance. the third party can be devided to the direct third party, the predicted third party and the third party which can be predicted reasonably

    縱觀世界各國學說與實踐,德國等大陸法系國家一般主張為契約責任,這主要是以默示信息提供契約,具保護第三人效力契約,契約結上過失等理由為依據;而英美法系國家,判例和學說趨向降旗認定為一種侵權責任,因為會計師與第三人之間並嚴格意義上契約關系,雖然對注冊會計師而言,第三人具有可被預見,但第三人畢竟是不確定多數人,因而會計師違反是法律事先規定義務,侵犯是一般公民權利,是絕對權,只能依侵權行為責任構成追究責任。
  4. With its incomparable advantage, such as high efficiency of concluding contract, low cost of concluding contract, promoting the security of trade and so on, standard clauses have been applied extensively in all fields of social economy and have done great contribution towards the development of modern economy

    由於格式條款具有節省約時間、節約約成本以及增進交易安全等傳統同條款法比擬優越,所以它被廣泛使用於社會經濟生活各個領域,並且已為現代經濟發展作出了令人矚目貢獻。
  5. In the framework, gats < annex on telecommunication > is the technical annex in the purpose of that basic principles and terms of gats could adapt to the public telecommunications transport networks and service better. the main idea of the annex is that each member shall ensure any service supplier of any other member is accorded access to and use of public telecommunication transport networks and services on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions, for the supply of a service included in its schedule ; the < agreement on basci telecommunications services > is the result of specific basic telecommunications services negotiation after the uruguay round, with a central meaning that commits in terms of impersonality and impartiality partly or wholly open the basic telecommunications services market to other member without discrimination

    在這個框架中, gats 《關于電信服務附件》是為了使gats框架協議基本原則和規定更好地適用於電信基礎傳輸服務而做出針對附加規定,其核心是要求每一成員應保證任何其他成員任何服務提供者可按照理和非歧視條款和條件進入和使用其公共電信傳輸網路和服務,以提供其減讓表中包括服務; 《基礎電信協議》是在烏拉圭回后專門進行基礎電信談判談判成果,其核心是在客觀、公正基礎上差別地向約方承諾部分或全部開放基礎電信服務市場。
  6. And this type of liability should character in the course of entering a contract, one party breaching the obligation with subjective fault, making the other party losses and the function of compensation. on the issues of liability basis, by criticizing tort doctrine, legal behavior doctrine, and regulatory doctrine, points out that the theoretical basis of the liability id good faith. the material foundation is subject to the liability basis, and the liability not only in the circumstances of contract coming into existence, be announced invalid and be cancelled, but possibly exists on occasion that contract is valid

    首先,文章指出約過失責任概念應包涵產生時間、主觀狀態、先同義務違反及損害產生四個關鍵因素,具有產生於約過程中、一方因主觀過錯違反先同義務、給對方造成損害以及彌補功能等特徵;在責任基礎問題上,通過對侵權行為說、法律行為說、法律規定說等反對觀點批駁,指出約過失責任理論基礎是誠實信用原則,其賴以產生事實基礎除了致同不成立之約過失、同被確認效或被撤銷之約過失外,提出了同有效情況下約過失存在可能
分享友人