無締合性的 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wúdìgěxìngde]
無締合性的
英文
unassociated- 無 : 無Ⅰ動詞(沒有) not have; there is not; be without Ⅱ名詞1 (沒有) nothing; nil 2 (姓氏) a surn...
- 締 : formconclude
- 合 : 合量詞(容量單位) ge, a unit of dry measure for grain (=1 decilitre)
- 性 : Ⅰ名詞1 (性格) nature; character; disposition 2 (性能; 性質) property; quality 3 (性別) sex ...
- 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
-
For the treaty about the responsibility ' s quality, have four kind doctrine, is a deflect to say respectively, and the act of law say, and the direct provision of law say that say with honest repute, and the writer more incline toward the honest repute to say, quanta this is the treaty about negligence responsibility this a special stage solicit of, the parties steer the activity relating to civil law the hour to must have the heart of bona fides the status, other doctrine all some lead long strong, treaty about of occasion, traditional standpoint it is an acknowledge concordat that negligence responsibility establish does not establish, void or reversed occasion
對于締約責任的性質,有四種學說,分別是侵權行為說,法律行為說,法律直接規定說和誠實信用說,筆者更傾向于誠實信用說,因為這是締約過失責任這一特殊階段要求的,當事人進行民事活動時必須具備誠實善良的內心狀態,其他學說都有些牽強。對于締約過失責任成立的場合,傳統的觀點是只承認合同不成立、無效或被撤銷的場合。筆者認為也應包括合同成立的場合,因為他同時也侵犯了非違約方的固有利益,雖然這部分利益不佔重點,但我們不能否認她們的存在,比如標的物有瑕疵,締約人違反保證等。Basically, the optimal transaction rules or institutions that could be designed or arranged are confined to legally enforceable formal contracts, and never involve those informal contracts, e. g. morality, culture and social customs. however, formal contracts and informal contracts are substitutive and complementary in solving asymmetric information problems
從理論上講,無論是最優契約的安排還是締約環境的設計,所規劃的只能是那些在法律上具有可執行性的正式合同或正式制度,並不包括以道德、習俗等方式存在的非正式合約,因為非正式合約都是不能為契約設計所左右的外生變量。Surveying the theories and practice all over the world, the countries such as german insist on contract responsibility according to providing contract by silent information and protecting the third party. however, america and england tend to infringement responsibility, because they think there is n ' t strict contract relations between accounting and the third party, and cpa against the liability stipulated in advance. the third party can be devided to the direct third party, the predicted third party and the third party which can be predicted reasonably
縱觀世界各國學說與實踐,德國等大陸法系國家一般主張為契約責任,這主要是以默示的信息提供契約,具保護第三人效力的契約,契約締結上的過失等理由為依據;而英美法系國家,判例和學說趨向降旗認定為一種侵權責任,因為會計師與第三人之間並無嚴格意義上的契約關系,雖然對注冊會計師而言,第三人具有合理的可被預見性,但第三人畢竟是不確定的多數人,因而會計師違反的是法律事先規定的義務,侵犯的是一般公民的權利,是絕對權,只能依侵權行為的責任構成追究責任。With its incomparable advantage, such as high efficiency of concluding contract, low cost of concluding contract, promoting the security of trade and so on, standard clauses have been applied extensively in all fields of social economy and have done great contribution towards the development of modern economy
由於格式條款具有節省締約時間、節約締約成本以及增進交易安全等傳統合同條款無法比擬的優越性,所以它被廣泛使用於社會經濟生活各個領域,並且已為現代經濟的發展作出了令人矚目的貢獻。In the framework, gats < annex on telecommunication > is the technical annex in the purpose of that basic principles and terms of gats could adapt to the public telecommunications transport networks and service better. the main idea of the annex is that each member shall ensure any service supplier of any other member is accorded access to and use of public telecommunication transport networks and services on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions, for the supply of a service included in its schedule ; the < agreement on basci telecommunications services > is the result of specific basic telecommunications services negotiation after the uruguay round, with a central meaning that commits in terms of impersonality and impartiality partly or wholly open the basic telecommunications services market to other member without discrimination
在這個框架中, gats 《關于電信服務的附件》是為了使gats框架協議的基本原則和規定更好地適用於電信基礎傳輸服務而做出的針對性附加規定,其核心是要求每一成員應保證任何其他成員的任何服務提供者可按照合理和非歧視的條款和條件進入和使用其公共電信傳輸網路和服務,以提供其減讓表中包括的服務; 《基礎電信協議》是在烏拉圭回合后專門進行的基礎電信談判的談判成果,其核心是在客觀、公正的基礎上無差別地向締約方承諾部分或全部開放基礎電信服務市場。And this type of liability should character in the course of entering a contract, one party breaching the obligation with subjective fault, making the other party losses and the function of compensation. on the issues of liability basis, by criticizing tort doctrine, legal behavior doctrine, and regulatory doctrine, points out that the theoretical basis of the liability id good faith. the material foundation is subject to the liability basis, and the liability not only in the circumstances of contract coming into existence, be announced invalid and be cancelled, but possibly exists on occasion that contract is valid
首先,文章指出締約過失責任的概念應包涵產生時間、主觀狀態、先合同義務的違反及損害的產生四個關鍵因素,具有產生於締約過程中、一方因主觀過錯違反先合同義務、給對方造成損害以及彌補功能等特徵;在責任基礎的問題上,通過對侵權行為說、法律行為說、法律規定說等反對觀點的批駁,指出締約過失責任的理論基礎是誠實信用原則,其賴以產生的事實基礎除了致合同不成立之締約過失、合同被確認無效或被撤銷之締約過失外,提出了合同有效情況下締約過失存在的可能性。分享友人